Category talk:Carnies - Revision history

imported>Mc hammark: /* One's we've not got */ new section

2009-12-27T13:12:14Z

One's we've not got: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 27 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Mc hammark: /* One's we've not got */ new section

2009-12-27T13:12:14Z

One's we've not got: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:12, 27 December 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)		For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)
	* All of those things you said are synonyms for each other. I don't see the harm in using those terms interchangeably. However, if we feel the need to decide on one term, I don't think we should use the term "carny" in the occupation section of the characters' infoboxes. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 8 December 2009 (EST)		* All of those things you said are synonyms for each other. I don't see the harm in using those terms interchangeably. However, if we feel the need to decide on one term, I don't think we should use the term "carny" in the occupation section of the characters' infoboxes. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 8 December 2009 (EST)

			== One's we've not got ==

			Should we note ones which don't have pages yet, cause there's that one that was at Joseph's funeral (the one in the top hat with cards on it) and she was also at samuel's speech at the end of the fifth stage, is she not entitled to a page? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 08:12, 27 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Intuitive Empath: /* Claire, Becky? */

2009-12-08T17:24:28Z

Claire, Becky?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:24, 8 December 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)		*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)
	****** How do we know that Becky ''hasn't'' been baptized? In fact, we've only seen one baptism. Also, how do we know that the kids don't have carnival acts? Amanda and Jennie are both involved in carnival acts. I'm not sure that's the best criteria, to be honest. We really don't know if Becky has been or hasn't been baptized, and we only know of a few acts at the carnival. I think somebody should be considered a carny if they live there, or if they have ever lived there. That would include the kids. That would also include Becky (since she went to live with at the carnival after she was orphaned), but not Claire yet. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:35, 8 December 2009 (EST)		****** How do we know that Becky ''hasn't'' been baptized? In fact, we've only seen one baptism. Also, how do we know that the kids don't have carnival acts? Amanda and Jennie are both involved in carnival acts. I'm not sure that's the best criteria, to be honest. We really don't know if Becky has been or hasn't been baptized, and we only know of a few acts at the carnival. I think somebody should be considered a carny if they live there, or if they have ever lived there. That would include the kids. That would also include Becky (since she went to live with at the carnival after she was orphaned), but not Claire yet. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:35, 8 December 2009 (EST)
			******* There is a solution, it might work every time, but it can be bothersome. Using a certain criteria, like suggested above, we categorize people according to that. Then, we take a look at the odd cases, and debate then. It's a two part process that should single out any unusual situation, allowing us to see if the certain unusual-situation character can be called a carny. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:24, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	== What to call them on their pages ==		== What to call them on their pages ==

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* What to call them on their pages */

2009-12-08T05:37:29Z

What to call them on their pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:37, 8 December 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)		For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)
	* All of those things you said are synonyms for each other. I don't see the harm in using those terms interchangeably. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 8 December 2009 (EST)		* All of those things you said are synonyms for each other. I don't see the harm in using those terms interchangeably. However, if we feel the need to decide on one term, I don't think we should use the term "carny" in the occupation section of the characters' infoboxes. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 8 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* What to call them on their pages */

2009-12-08T05:36:31Z

What to call them on their pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:36, 8 December 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:

	For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)		For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)
			* All of those things you said are synonyms for each other. I don't see the harm in using those terms interchangeably. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:36, 8 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Claire, Becky? */

2009-12-08T05:35:37Z

Claire, Becky?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:35, 8 December 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)		****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)
	*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)		*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)
			****** How do we know that Becky ''hasn't'' been baptized? In fact, we've only seen one baptism. Also, how do we know that the kids don't have carnival acts? Amanda and Jennie are both involved in carnival acts. I'm not sure that's the best criteria, to be honest. We really don't know if Becky has been or hasn't been baptized, and we only know of a few acts at the carnival. I think somebody should be considered a carny if they live there, or if they have ever lived there. That would include the kids. That would also include Becky (since she went to live with at the carnival after she was orphaned), but not Claire yet. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:35, 8 December 2009 (EST)

	== What to call them on their pages ==		== What to call them on their pages ==

imported>Mc hammark: /* What to call them on their pages */ new section

2009-12-07T22:09:08Z

What to call them on their pages: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:09, 7 December 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)		****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)
	*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)		*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)

			== What to call them on their pages ==

			For all these people we have to decide what to call them on their page. Some call them Carny, others call them worker at Sullivan Bros. Carnival, and others state exactly what act they performed. To keep up standards, I think we should decide what to name their occupation as on all their pages so it is more professional. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:09, 7 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Claire, Becky? */

2009-12-05T21:21:10Z

Claire, Becky?

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 5 December 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)		***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)
	****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)		****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)
			*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Intuitive Empath at 21:14, 5 December 2009

2009-12-05T21:14:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 5 December 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Define "long enough". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:46, 4 December 2009 (EST)		** Define "long enough". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:46, 4 December 2009 (EST)
	***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)		***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)
			****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Claire, Becky? */

2009-12-05T12:05:34Z

Claire, Becky?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 5 December 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*I think that we should only consider as carnies people who have acts in it and people who resided in it for a long enough time. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:31, 3 December 2009 (EST)		*I think that we should only consider as carnies people who have acts in it and people who resided in it for a long enough time. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:31, 3 December 2009 (EST)
	** Define "long enough". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:46, 4 December 2009 (EST)		** Define "long enough". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:46, 4 December 2009 (EST)
			***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 5 December 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)		***ok, people who either have acts, or are ''baptized'' into the family like sylar was. Becky will have been baptized but as of yet, claire has neither been baptized, nor has she stated that she will be living there from now on. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 07:05, 5 December 2009 (EST)
	****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)		****For me, long enough would be like the children at the carnival. They're there, but they don't have their own acts. Perhaps people that were seen there and have no other known current address. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:14, 5 December 2009 (EST)
			*****That would rule out Becky. Unless we have three criteria that allow them to be a carny. They have been called part of the family; they have no other known address and have been seen at the carnival (outside of its opening to the public); or they have their own act. That would allow them to include Becky, but not claire yet. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:21, 5 December 2009 (EST)