Category talk:Characters with The Mark - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 00:47, 21 February 2007

2007-02-21T00:47:28Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 00:47, 21 February 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 00:47, 21 February 2007

2007-02-21T00:47:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 21 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)		**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)
	*** ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in [[The Mark]], but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to [[Claude]]'s old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)		*** ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in [[The Mark]], but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to [[Claude]]'s old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			****Good point. But we should still change it to "the Mark". I'll take care of that now. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 19:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Orne: comment

2007-02-20T21:53:14Z

comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 20 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)		* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)
	**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)		**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			*** ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in [[The Mark]], but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to [[Claude]]'s old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 21:47, 20 February 2007

2007-02-20T21:47:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 20 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)		Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)
	* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)		* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 21:21, 20 February 2007

2007-02-20T21:21:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 20 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)		Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: quotes

2007-02-20T20:41:28Z

quotes

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:41, 20 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should it be Characters with the Mark (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)		Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: Should it be Characters with the Mark (lowercase ''t'')? ~~~~

2007-02-20T20:40:59Z

New page: Should it be Characters with the Mark (lowercase ''t'')? ~~~~

New page

Should it be Characters with the Mark (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 21 February 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)		**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)
	*** ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in [[The Mark]], but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to [[Claude]]'s old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)		*** ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in [[The Mark]], but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to [[Claude]]'s old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			****Good point. But we should still change it to "the Mark". I'll take care of that now. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 19:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:53, 20 February 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)		* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)
	**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)		**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			*** ... and, in my opinion, exactly what a Category is for... to allow us to quickly group all of the articles that relate to the topic. I also agree that the same list could be generated from the About section in [[The Mark]], but if the list of characters that are Marked grows, I feel that this category allows you to quickly find all of the characters (heck, it grew +2 in single episode, and apparently in a few more, we get another flashback to [[Claude]]'s old supergroup, whom I presume are also Marked). --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 16:53, 20 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:47, 20 February 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)		Should it be "Characters with the Mark" (lowercase ''t'')? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:40, 20 February 2007 (EST)
	* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)		* Probably. Next question: Should it be? Isn't this all pretty well covered in each character's Notes and on [[the mark]]?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:21, 20 February 2007 (EST)
			**I agree. Since we already have it, I'm not strongly opposed to it. But it does seem superfluous. And extra. And unnecessary. And redundant. And ... — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 16:47, 20 February 2007 (EST)