Category talk:Future Groups - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv red link

2007-05-28T20:23:19Z

rmv red link

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:23, 28 May 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv red link

2007-05-28T20:23:19Z

rmv red link

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 28 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
	** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
	***I actually find it harder to manage. It's more difficult to remember the names of each of the three categories (four if we start doing Past Groups, like for Kensei's army or something). It'd be much easier to just categorize all groups under [[:Category:Groups]]. By my count, there'd be 8 written articles and 6 unwritten articles. 14 cells in a portal looks much nicer than [[Portal:Unnamed Groups\|3]] or ~~[[Portal:Future Groups\|~~4]]. If we don't like that, we can still just categorize everything as [[:Category:Named Groups\|Named Groups]] and [[:Category:Unnamed Groups\|Unnamed Groups]], which would give us a portal of 8 (named) and a portal of 6, which is still nicer than what we have. Sure, there may be more future groups, and we can recreate the category easily then. But until then, it just looks very empty with not much promise of filling up anytime soon. I would consolidate it. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:52, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		***I actually find it harder to manage. It's more difficult to remember the names of each of the three categories (four if we start doing Past Groups, like for Kensei's army or something). It'd be much easier to just categorize all groups under [[:Category:Groups]]. By my count, there'd be 8 written articles and 6 unwritten articles. 14 cells in a portal looks much nicer than [[Portal:Unnamed Groups\|3]] or 4. If we don't like that, we can still just categorize everything as [[:Category:Named Groups\|Named Groups]] and [[:Category:Unnamed Groups\|Unnamed Groups]], which would give us a portal of 8 (named) and a portal of 6, which is still nicer than what we have. Sure, there may be more future groups, and we can recreate the category easily then. But until then, it just looks very empty with not much promise of filling up anytime soon. I would consolidate it. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:52, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 22:52, 24 May 2007

2007-05-24T22:52:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 24 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
	** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
			***I actually find it harder to manage. It's more difficult to remember the names of each of the three categories (four if we start doing Past Groups, like for Kensei's army or something). It'd be much easier to just categorize all groups under [[:Category:Groups]]. By my count, there'd be 8 written articles and 6 unwritten articles. 14 cells in a portal looks much nicer than [[Portal:Unnamed Groups\|3]] or [[Portal:Future Groups\|4]]. If we don't like that, we can still just categorize everything as [[:Category:Named Groups\|Named Groups]] and [[:Category:Unnamed Groups\|Unnamed Groups]], which would give us a portal of 8 (named) and a portal of 6, which is still nicer than what we have. Sure, there may be more future groups, and we can recreate the category easily then. But until then, it just looks very empty with not much promise of filling up anytime soon. I would consolidate it. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:52, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: Groups categories

2007-05-24T21:36:51Z

Groups categories

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 24 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be enough. Otherwise we're going to have a lot of wimpy portals and too-specific categories. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:29, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be enough. Otherwise we're going to have a lot of wimpy portals and too-specific categories. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:29, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
	* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
			** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Heroe at 21:11, 24 May 2007

2007-05-24T21:11:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 24 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be enough. Otherwise we're going to have a lot of wimpy portals and too-specific categories. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:29, 18 May 2007 (EDT)		Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be enough. Otherwise we're going to have a lot of wimpy portals and too-specific categories. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:29, 18 May 2007 (EDT)
			* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be ...

2007-05-18T16:29:05Z

New page: Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be ...

New page

Do we really need all these catgories for these groups? I mean, how many future groups will there be? I would think that until we populate the groups a bit, one "Groups" category would be enough. Otherwise we're going to have a lot of wimpy portals and too-specific categories. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 12:29, 18 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:23, 28 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
	** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
	***I actually find it harder to manage. It's more difficult to remember the names of each of the three categories (four if we start doing Past Groups, like for Kensei's army or something). It'd be much easier to just categorize all groups under [[:Category:Groups]]. By my count, there'd be 8 written articles and 6 unwritten articles. 14 cells in a portal looks much nicer than [[Portal:Unnamed Groups\|3]] or ~~[[Portal:Future Groups\|~~4]]. If we don't like that, we can still just categorize everything as [[:Category:Named Groups\|Named Groups]] and [[:Category:Unnamed Groups\|Unnamed Groups]], which would give us a portal of 8 (named) and a portal of 6, which is still nicer than what we have. Sure, there may be more future groups, and we can recreate the category easily then. But until then, it just looks very empty with not much promise of filling up anytime soon. I would consolidate it. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:52, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		***I actually find it harder to manage. It's more difficult to remember the names of each of the three categories (four if we start doing Past Groups, like for Kensei's army or something). It'd be much easier to just categorize all groups under [[:Category:Groups]]. By my count, there'd be 8 written articles and 6 unwritten articles. 14 cells in a portal looks much nicer than [[Portal:Unnamed Groups\|3]] or 4. If we don't like that, we can still just categorize everything as [[:Category:Named Groups\|Named Groups]] and [[:Category:Unnamed Groups\|Unnamed Groups]], which would give us a portal of 8 (named) and a portal of 6, which is still nicer than what we have. Sure, there may be more future groups, and we can recreate the category easily then. But until then, it just looks very empty with not much promise of filling up anytime soon. I would consolidate it. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:52, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 24 May 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		* I agree. [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Heroe\|<span style="color:#FF6600">(contribs)</span>]]</small> 17:11, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
	** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)		** There could be more gn's or episodes set in the future, so who knows. We do know, however, that Hiro is currently in the past, so we may end up seeing a few "past" groups. Seperating out the past and future groups just makes things easier to manage, imho.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:36, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
			***I actually find it harder to manage. It's more difficult to remember the names of each of the three categories (four if we start doing Past Groups, like for Kensei's army or something). It'd be much easier to just categorize all groups under [[:Category:Groups]]. By my count, there'd be 8 written articles and 6 unwritten articles. 14 cells in a portal looks much nicer than [[Portal:Unnamed Groups\|3]] or [[Portal:Future Groups\|4]]. If we don't like that, we can still just categorize everything as [[:Category:Named Groups\|Named Groups]] and [[:Category:Unnamed Groups\|Unnamed Groups]], which would give us a portal of 8 (named) and a portal of 6, which is still nicer than what we have. Sure, there may be more future groups, and we can recreate the category easily then. But until then, it just looks very empty with not much promise of filling up anytime soon. I would consolidate it. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 18:52, 24 May 2007 (EDT)