Category talk:Images of Sparrow Redhouse - Revision history

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: deleting Sparrow's images

2009-05-23T02:18:25Z

deleting Sparrow's images

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 23 May 2009
(No difference)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: deleting Sparrow's images

2009-05-23T02:18:25Z

deleting Sparrow's images

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 23 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>		**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>
	***** Pretty much all main characters have image cats, plus some of the more notable recurring characters (like those who have been through several seasons, not a few episodes). --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 08:29, 21 May 2009 (EDT)		***** Pretty much all main characters have image cats, plus some of the more notable recurring characters (like those who have been through several seasons, not a few episodes). --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 08:29, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
			******Sparrow debuted in Season 1, has been mentioned in 5 episodes, and has appeared in 4 Graphic Novels. <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/22/2009 22:18 (EST)</small>

imported>Radicell at 12:29, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T12:29:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:29, 21 May 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*** I agree, I don't think we need this category. It means more maintenance that's not very appealing. It means either having to tag an image every time one is uploaded, or having incomplete categories. Plus, we already have a very full gallery on Sparrow's page. I'd rather see people create their own galleries if they want to collect all the images of a character who is very minor, like Sparrow. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:14, 21 May 2009 (EDT)		*** I agree, I don't think we need this category. It means more maintenance that's not very appealing. It means either having to tag an image every time one is uploaded, or having incomplete categories. Plus, we already have a very full gallery on Sparrow's page. I'd rather see people create their own galleries if they want to collect all the images of a character who is very minor, like Sparrow. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:14, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
	**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>		**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>
			***** Pretty much all main characters have image cats, plus some of the more notable recurring characters (like those who have been through several seasons, not a few episodes). --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 08:29, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: What's the rule of thumb to warrant an image-cat?

2009-05-21T12:23:26Z

What's the rule of thumb to warrant an image-cat?

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 21 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** What's the harm guys? Img-Cats are nice organized ways to show all or most pictures of a character. We probably should have one for Hana, BTW. Img-cats are great things because they help avoid having to seach through the image-list which isn't very userfriendly when looking for pictures, since there is no standard naming convention for pictures, and many pictures involving characters don't contain the character name in their title. If there is no harm in a character having an img-cat, but it helps us better organize their pictures, why not have them? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/20/2009 22:40 (EST)</small>		** What's the harm guys? Img-Cats are nice organized ways to show all or most pictures of a character. We probably should have one for Hana, BTW. Img-cats are great things because they help avoid having to seach through the image-list which isn't very userfriendly when looking for pictures, since there is no standard naming convention for pictures, and many pictures involving characters don't contain the character name in their title. If there is no harm in a character having an img-cat, but it helps us better organize their pictures, why not have them? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/20/2009 22:40 (EST)</small>
	*** I agree, I don't think we need this category. It means more maintenance that's not very appealing. It means either having to tag an image every time one is uploaded, or having incomplete categories. Plus, we already have a very full gallery on Sparrow's page. I'd rather see people create their own galleries if they want to collect all the images of a character who is very minor, like Sparrow. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:14, 21 May 2009 (EDT)		*** I agree, I don't think we need this category. It means more maintenance that's not very appealing. It means either having to tag an image every time one is uploaded, or having incomplete categories. Plus, we already have a very full gallery on Sparrow's page. I'd rather see people create their own galleries if they want to collect all the images of a character who is very minor, like Sparrow. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:14, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
			**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 04:14, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T04:14:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 21 May 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	*I don't see the need for this category. For a character who's appeared in one episode and a few graphic novels? We don't even have an image cat for Hana Gitelman. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:21, 20 May 2009 (EDT)		*I don't see the need for this category. For a character who's appeared in one episode and a few graphic novels? We don't even have an image cat for Hana Gitelman. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:21, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
	** What's the harm guys? Img-Cats are nice organized ways to show all or most pictures of a character. We probably should have one for Hana, BTW. Img-cats are great things because they help avoid having to seach through the image-list which isn't very userfriendly when looking for pictures, since there is no standard naming convention for pictures, and many pictures involving characters don't contain the character name in their title. If there is no harm in a character having an img-cat, but it helps us better organize their pictures, why not have them? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/20/2009 22:40 (EST)</small>		** What's the harm guys? Img-Cats are nice organized ways to show all or most pictures of a character. We probably should have one for Hana, BTW. Img-cats are great things because they help avoid having to seach through the image-list which isn't very userfriendly when looking for pictures, since there is no standard naming convention for pictures, and many pictures involving characters don't contain the character name in their title. If there is no harm in a character having an img-cat, but it helps us better organize their pictures, why not have them? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/20/2009 22:40 (EST)</small>
			*** I agree, I don't think we need this category. It means more maintenance that's not very appealing. It means either having to tag an image every time one is uploaded, or having incomplete categories. Plus, we already have a very full gallery on Sparrow's page. I'd rather see people create their own galleries if they want to collect all the images of a character who is very minor, like Sparrow. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:14, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: re

2009-05-21T02:40:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 21 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't even think we've ever done that for GN characters before, let alone ones that have appeared 3 times total.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 22:31, 19 May 2009 (EDT)		Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't even think we've ever done that for GN characters before, let alone ones that have appeared 3 times total.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 22:31, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
	*I don't see the need for this category. For a character who's appeared in one episode and a few graphic novels? We don't even have an image cat for Hana Gitelman. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:21, 20 May 2009 (EDT)		*I don't see the need for this category. For a character who's appeared in one episode and a few graphic novels? We don't even have an image cat for Hana Gitelman. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:21, 20 May 2009 (EDT)
			** What's the harm guys? Img-Cats are nice organized ways to show all or most pictures of a character. We probably should have one for Hana, BTW. Img-cats are great things because they help avoid having to seach through the image-list which isn't very userfriendly when looking for pictures, since there is no standard naming convention for pictures, and many pictures involving characters don't contain the character name in their title. If there is no harm in a character having an img-cat, but it helps us better organize their pictures, why not have them? <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/20/2009 22:40 (EST)</small>

imported>Radicell at 13:21, 20 May 2009

2009-05-20T13:21:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:21, 20 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't even think we've ever done that for GN characters before, let alone ones that have appeared 3 times total.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 22:31, 19 May 2009 (EDT)		Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't even think we've ever done that for GN characters before, let alone ones that have appeared 3 times total.--[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 22:31, 19 May 2009 (EDT)
			*I don't see the need for this category. For a character who's appeared in one episode and a few graphic novels? We don't even have an image cat for Hana Gitelman. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:21, 20 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>Piemanmoo: New page: Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't eve...

2009-05-20T02:31:28Z

New page: Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't eve...

New page

Do we really need this page? I know Sparrow has (techincaly) been with us since season 1, but we've only really met her up until know, and she gets her own category for images? I don't even think we've ever done that for GN characters before, let alone ones that have appeared 3 times total.--[[User:Piemanmoo|Piemanmoo]] 22:31, 19 May 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:18, 23 May 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>		**** So how many character images warrant or would allow an image-cat to be viable and remain? 15, 20, 50?<small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/21/2009 08:23 (EST)</small>
	***** Pretty much all main characters have image cats, plus some of the more notable recurring characters (like those who have been through several seasons, not a few episodes). --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 08:29, 21 May 2009 (EDT)		***** Pretty much all main characters have image cats, plus some of the more notable recurring characters (like those who have been through several seasons, not a few episodes). --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 08:29, 21 May 2009 (EDT)
			******Sparrow debuted in Season 1, has been mentioned in 5 episodes, and has appeared in 4 Graphic Novels. <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 05/22/2009 22:18 (EST)</small>