Category talk:International Broadcaster Creations - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 23:22, 24 November 2007

2007-11-24T23:22:00Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:22, 24 November 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 23:22, 24 November 2007

2007-11-24T23:22:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 24 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into [[:Category:Heroes 360]] is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather create "Category:BBC Two" than this category which seems like it's on level with [[:Category:Fan Creations]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 17:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)		I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into [[:Category:Heroes 360]] is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather create "Category:BBC Two" than this category which seems like it's on level with [[:Category:Fan Creations]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 17:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)
	*I can roll with a "Category:BBC Two." The reasons I created this is because I have a problem accepting BBC 2's creations as Canon, since they were created by neither Kring et al at Heroes HQ nor NBC. Also, probes as to their canoncy have been sidestepped by Joe Pokaski and Aron Coleite in BTE. I don't think they should be touted as canon when they very well may not be. also unrelated to my issues with BBC 2 creating Bridget et al is are other broadcasters creating similar stuff? At any rate I am totally cool with having this as "Category:BBC Two" instead; by all means make it so.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 18:05, 24 November 2007 (EST)		*I can roll with a "Category:BBC Two." The reasons I created this is because I have a problem accepting BBC 2's creations as Canon, since they were created by neither Kring et al at Heroes HQ nor NBC. Also, probes as to their canoncy have been sidestepped by Joe Pokaski and Aron Coleite in BTE. I don't think they should be touted as canon when they very well may not be. also unrelated to my issues with BBC 2 creating Bridget et al is are other broadcasters creating similar stuff? At any rate I am totally cool with having this as "Category:BBC Two" instead; by all means make it so.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 18:05, 24 November 2007 (EST)
			**I understand why you created it, and I think it's really great that you are trying to keep non-canon information separate from canon information. However, even Heroes Evolutions content is not [[canon]]--it's considered "near-canon". I kind of think of the BBC Two information as being on the same level. My question is less about the canonicity of the content, but the name. Since I suppose you can't access it from NBC's website, it's probably not technically part of Heroes Evolutions. I'll change the cat name to BBC Two. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:22, 24 November 2007 (EST)

imported>SacValleyDweller at 23:05, 24 November 2007

2007-11-24T23:05:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 24 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into [[:Category:Heroes 360]] is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather create "Category:BBC Two" than this category which seems like it's on level with [[:Category:Fan Creations]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 17:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)		I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into [[:Category:Heroes 360]] is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather create "Category:BBC Two" than this category which seems like it's on level with [[:Category:Fan Creations]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 17:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)
			*I can roll with a "Category:BBC Two." The reasons I created this is because I have a problem accepting BBC 2's creations as Canon, since they were created by neither Kring et al at Heroes HQ nor NBC. Also, probes as to their canoncy have been sidestepped by Joe Pokaski and Aron Coleite in BTE. I don't think they should be touted as canon when they very well may not be. also unrelated to my issues with BBC 2 creating Bridget et al is are other broadcasters creating similar stuff? At any rate I am totally cool with having this as "Category:BBC Two" instead; by all means make it so.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 18:05, 24 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into :Category:Heroes 360 is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather creat...

2007-11-24T22:37:17Z

New page: I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into Category:Heroes 360 is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather creat...

New page

I don't think this category is necessary. I think putting the information from BBC Two into [[:Category:Heroes 360]] is sufficient. But if there's an issue with that, I'd much rather create "Category:BBC Two" than this category which seems like it's on level with [[:Category:Fan Creations]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 17:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)