Category talk:Plot Points - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: more specific name

2007-01-03T02:58:08Z

more specific name

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:58, 3 January 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: more specific name

2007-01-03T02:58:08Z

more specific name

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:58, 3 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Archived Talk: [[Category talk:Plot Points/Archive 1\|~~Archive~~ 1]]		Archived Talk: [[Category talk:Plot Points/Archive 1\|Nov/Dec 2006]]

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: archiving

2007-01-03T02:56:40Z

archiving

Show changes

imported>Hardvice: rem red link

2006-12-22T05:10:23Z

rem red link

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:10, 22 December 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	==Standarize Plot Point image size?==		==Standarize Plot Point image size?==
	It bugs me that [[Portal:Plot Points]] is a gallery and the rest are tables. The only way we can fix this is to standardize the image size for plot points (at least those that are in the gallery, but it would be better to do all of them if we do any—there are only 44, so it wouldn't be much of a chore). This raises a few questions:		It bugs me that Portal:Plot Points is a gallery and the rest are tables. The only way we can fix this is to standardize the image size for plot points (at least those that are in the gallery, but it would be better to do all of them if we do any—there are only 44, so it wouldn't be much of a chore). This raises a few questions:
	# Should we have a sidebar for plot points? Pretty much everything else has one by now.		# Should we have a sidebar for plot points? Pretty much everything else has one by now.
	# What on Earth would go in the sidebar? First appearance? Related characters? Just the image and caption?		# What on Earth would go in the sidebar? First appearance? Related characters? Just the image and caption?

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Standarize Plot Point image size? */

2006-12-21T04:41:22Z

Standarize Plot Point image size?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:41, 21 December 2006
Line 42:		Line 42:

	All told, this makes for only a net +2 top-level cats after you lose Plot Points.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:13, 20 December 2006 (EST)		All told, this makes for only a net +2 top-level cats after you lose Plot Points.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:13, 20 December 2006 (EST)
			:This will be really great, I think. I like Sylar's murders (Sylar's crimes, maybe, to be more general) under events, and I think dropping predictions is a good idea. That's the whole prophecy article, anyway. I like your distinctions for Isaac's artwork and prophecy; the visions work under events, too. (I don't know if I would really consider them prophecies, anyway - they're a bit more abstract. But moot point.) This will be Lost-rrific — oh, sorry, you didn't get that reference, did you? heh heh. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:41, 20 December 2006 (EST)

	==Suggestions for New Cats==		==Suggestions for New Cats==

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Suggestions for New Cats */

2006-12-21T04:26:19Z

Suggestions for New Cats

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 21 December 2006
Line 154:		Line 154:
	***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)		***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	****On further reflection, [[the message]] can go under events without too much fuss.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:18, 20 December 2006 (EST)		****On further reflection, [[the message]] can go under events without too much fuss.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:18, 20 December 2006 (EST)
			*****Not perfect, but it works fine for me. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:26, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)		** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: /* Suggestions for New Cats */

2006-12-21T04:18:49Z

Suggestions for New Cats

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 21 December 2006
Line 153:		Line 153:
	** I like the idea of story arc articles, but I'm not sure that's the same as [[The message]]. Is it?		** I like the idea of story arc articles, but I'm not sure that's the same as [[The message]]. Is it?
	***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)		***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)
			****On further reflection, [[the message]] can go under events without too much fuss.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:18, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)		** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: +subcat

2006-12-21T04:16:30Z

+subcat

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 21 December 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:
	******* I should read responses before I type, huh?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)		******* I should read responses before I type, huh?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	*******One solution is to break PP into a couple big cats, then subcat as needed:		*******One solution is to break PP into a couple big cats, then subcat as needed:
	''Events'' -- Events		''Events'' -- Events, Sylar's murders
	''Items'' -- Weapons, Research, Media (I originally meant more like tapes, cds, rather than media outlets), Publications, Artwork, Money		''Items'' -- Weapons, Research, Media (I originally meant more like tapes, cds, rather than media outlets), Publications, Artwork, Money
	''Symbols'' -- Symbols		''Symbols'' -- Symbols

imported>Hardvice: /* Standarize Plot Point image size? */ adjust breakdown

2006-12-21T04:14:54Z

Standarize Plot Point image size?: adjust breakdown

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 21 December 2006
Line 36:		Line 36:
	*******One solution is to break PP into a couple big cats, then subcat as needed:		*******One solution is to break PP into a couple big cats, then subcat as needed:
	''Events'' -- Events		''Events'' -- Events
	''Items'' -- ~~Objects~~, Research, Media (I originally meant more like tapes, cds, rather than media outlets), Publications, Artwork		''Items'' -- Weapons, Research, Media (I originally meant more like tapes, cds, rather than media outlets), Publications, Artwork, Money
	''Symbols'' -- Symbols		''Symbols'' -- Symbols

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Suggestions for New Cats */

2006-12-21T04:14:44Z

Suggestions for New Cats

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:14, 21 December 2006
Line 148:		Line 148:
	** I like "Sylar's victims" as a cat more than "Linderman's organization" (or HRG's organization, which we should also kill as a cat).		** I like "Sylar's victims" as a cat more than "Linderman's organization" (or HRG's organization, which we should also kill as a cat).
	** Finances makes for kind of a strange category, but it def. works.		** Finances makes for kind of a strange category, but it def. works.
			***Maybe under a different name? Filthy Lucre?
	** Agree re: Uluru. I was being an ass I think.		** Agree re: Uluru. I was being an ass I think.
	** Rift under powers seems fine to me. It's related to powers. We should adjust the cat description for that, and maybe put Prophecy under (just) powers as well		** Rift under powers seems fine to me. It's related to powers. We should adjust the cat description for that, and maybe put Prophecy under (just) powers as well
	** I like the idea of story arc articles, but I'm not sure that's the same as [[The message]]. Is it?		** I like the idea of story arc articles, but I'm not sure that's the same as [[The message]]. Is it?
			***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)		** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:26, 21 December 2006
Line 154:		Line 154:
	***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)		***Yeah, I think I was just pontificating on somehow acknowledging story arcs. Articles work; I agree that a category doesn't. And The Message doesn't fit right, you're correct. I still don't know where it fits. Maybe we should make a "Romulan Alcoholic Beverages"-like category, and have a category called simply "Messages"? Seems superfuous to me, but it works. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:14, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	****On further reflection, [[the message]] can go under events without too much fuss.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:18, 20 December 2006 (EST)		****On further reflection, [[the message]] can go under events without too much fuss.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:18, 20 December 2006 (EST)
			*****Not perfect, but it works fine for me. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:26, 20 December 2006 (EST)
	** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)		** Linderman's prosecution could go under Law enforcement even if we hose Linderman's organization.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:04, 20 December 2006 (EST)