Category talk:Powers - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Examples of (insert power here) */

2007-03-07T03:05:22Z

Examples of (insert power here)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 7 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Examples of (insert power here) */

2007-03-07T03:05:22Z

Examples of (insert power here)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:05, 7 March 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Are we going to make articles like that for all of the powers, or just the ones wiht a ton of examples? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:52, 6 March 2007 (EST)		Are we going to make articles like that for all of the powers, or just the ones wiht a ton of examples? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:52, 6 March 2007 (EST)
			*Just the ones with lots of examples. The consensus is somewhere around 10-12 examples. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:05, 6 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Heroe: Examples of (insert power here)

2007-03-07T02:52:01Z

Examples of (insert power here)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 7 March 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))		::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))
	:::I'll point out that the section is designed to incorporate both lower limits (the character can do ''at least'' X) and upper limits (the character can ''not'' do Y). "Uses" are essentially a type of lower limit. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 09:20, 11 December 2006 (EST)		:::I'll point out that the section is designed to incorporate both lower limits (the character can do ''at least'' X) and upper limits (the character can ''not'' do Y). "Uses" are essentially a type of lower limit. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 09:20, 11 December 2006 (EST)

			== Examples of (insert power here) ==

			Are we going to make articles like that for all of the powers, or just the ones wiht a ton of examples? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green;">Heroe</span>]] 21:52, 6 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ted C: /* Individual Powers Pages */

2006-12-11T14:20:03Z

Individual Powers Pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 11 December 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)		:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)
	::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))		::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))
			:::I'll point out that the section is designed to incorporate both lower limits (the character can do ''at least'' X) and upper limits (the character can ''not'' do Y). "Uses" are essentially a type of lower limit. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 09:20, 11 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Jared: /* Individual Powers Pages */

2006-12-09T22:07:54Z

Individual Powers Pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 9 December 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)		Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)
	:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)		:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)
			::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Individual Powers Pages */ keep limits and uses together

2006-12-09T00:23:12Z

Individual Powers Pages: keep limits and uses together

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:23, 9 December 2006
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==Individual Powers Pages==		==Individual Powers Pages==
	Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)		Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)
			:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Jared: Format of individual powers pages

2006-12-08T23:58:58Z

Format of individual powers pages

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:58, 8 December 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Ok, it's just that we're doing so good keeping [[Special:Uncategorizedcategories]] clean! :) How about the [[Powers]] article gets moved under [[:Category:Powers]], and [[:Category:Powers]] is moved to a sub-cat of [[:Category:Production]] (like the rest of the show-related details) --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 15:29, 7 December 2006 (EST)		: Ok, it's just that we're doing so good keeping [[Special:Uncategorizedcategories]] clean! :) How about the [[Powers]] article gets moved under [[:Category:Powers]], and [[:Category:Powers]] is moved to a sub-cat of [[:Category:Production]] (like the rest of the show-related details) --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 15:29, 7 December 2006 (EST)
	:: Production is supposed to be for real-world articles (soundtrack, cast and crew, etc.). I've never thought of Uncategorized cats as being something we need to watch ... most categories probably ''shouldn't'' have a cat unless they are a clear subcat (Deceased Character under People, etc.)--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:35, 7 December 2006 (EST)		:: Production is supposed to be for real-world articles (soundtrack, cast and crew, etc.). I've never thought of Uncategorized cats as being something we need to watch ... most categories probably ''shouldn't'' have a cat unless they are a clear subcat (Deceased Character under People, etc.)--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:35, 7 December 2006 (EST)


			==Individual Powers Pages==
			Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)

imported>Hardvice: /* Category */

2006-12-07T20:35:57Z

imported>Orne: comment

2006-12-07T20:29:53Z

comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 7 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Category==		==Category==
	"Plot Points' makes sense, since that's where the main article is right now. However, Categories don't ''have'' to have categories. I'd just as soon move [[Powers]] to this cat and make it a top-level cat instead of a subcat.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 7 December 2006 (EST)		"Plot Points' makes sense, since that's where the main article is right now. However, Categories don't ''have'' to have categories. I'd just as soon move [[Powers]] to this cat and make it a top-level cat instead of a subcat.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 7 December 2006 (EST)
			: Ok, it's just that we're doing so good keeping [[Special:Uncategorizedcategories]] clean! :) How about the [[Powers]] article gets moved under [[:Category:Powers]], and [[:Category:Powers]] is moved to a sub-cat of [[:Category:Production]] (like the rest of the show-related details) --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 15:29, 7 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 20:26, 7 December 2006

2006-12-07T20:26:58Z

New page

==Category==
"Plot Points' makes sense, since that's where the main article is right now. However, Categories don't ''have'' to have categories. I'd just as soon move [[Powers]] to this cat and make it a top-level cat instead of a subcat.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 7 December 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 11 December 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)		:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)
	::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))		::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))
			:::I'll point out that the section is designed to incorporate both lower limits (the character can do ''at least'' X) and upper limits (the character can ''not'' do Y). "Uses" are essentially a type of lower limit. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 09:20, 11 December 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:07, 9 December 2006
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)		Looking at the pages for the individual powers, it looks like the 'Limits' section has become 'Limits and Uses' section. Does anyone object to splitting them and putting D.L.'s phase-into-someone-and-knock-them-unconscious ability under a 'Uses' section and Isaac's inability to focus his precognition on a subject until the 'Limits' section? If you have a suggestion for a label other than 'Uses', please give that, as well? ([[User:Jared\|Jared]] 18:56, 8 December 2006)
	:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)		:I think "Limits and Uses" is fine, and the two should be kept as a single section. There's a lot of overlap, and if we separate them, we risk a lot of back and forth about ''Is this a limit? Is it a use?'' Since they're so closely related, may as well keep them together. Just my thought. :) - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 19:23, 8 December 2006 (EST)
			::A good point. [[User:Jared\|Jared]] 17:07, 9 December 2006 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 7 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"Plot Points' makes sense, since that's where the main article is right now. However, Categories don't ''have'' to have categories. I'd just as soon move [[Powers]] to this cat and make it a top-level cat instead of a subcat.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 7 December 2006 (EST)		"Plot Points' makes sense, since that's where the main article is right now. However, Categories don't ''have'' to have categories. I'd just as soon move [[Powers]] to this cat and make it a top-level cat instead of a subcat.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:26, 7 December 2006 (EST)
	: Ok, it's just that we're doing so good keeping [[Special:Uncategorizedcategories]] clean! :) How about the [[Powers]] article gets moved under [[:Category:Powers]], and [[:Category:Powers]] is moved to a sub-cat of [[:Category:Production]] (like the rest of the show-related details) --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 15:29, 7 December 2006 (EST)		: Ok, it's just that we're doing so good keeping [[Special:Uncategorizedcategories]] clean! :) How about the [[Powers]] article gets moved under [[:Category:Powers]], and [[:Category:Powers]] is moved to a sub-cat of [[:Category:Production]] (like the rest of the show-related details) --[[User:Orne\|Orne]] 15:29, 7 December 2006 (EST)
			:: Production is supposed to be for real-world articles (soundtrack, cast and crew, etc.). I've never thought of Uncategorized cats as being something we need to watch ... most categories probably ''shouldn't'' have a cat unless they are a clear subcat (Deceased Character under People, etc.)--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:35, 7 December 2006 (EST)