Category talk:Promotional Images - Revision history

imported>Admin: /* Promoting Whom? */

2007-01-06T05:02:32Z

Promoting Whom?

← Older revision	Revision as of 05:02, 6 January 2007
(No difference)

imported>Admin: /* Promoting Whom? */

2007-01-06T05:02:32Z

Promoting Whom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 6 January 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)		*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)		**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)
			***** Ok, I'm going to "go there". :) Why does it irk you? What's the value in distinguishing between them? (Mostly playing devil's advocate here). ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:02, 6 January 2007 (EST))
	***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)		***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	****** Good point. How's <nowiki>{{image-NonHeroesPromotional}}</nowiki>? Or do we scrap the whole idea altogether? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:34, 5 January 2007 (EST)		****** Good point. How's <nowiki>{{image-NonHeroesPromotional}}</nowiki>? Or do we scrap the whole idea altogether? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:34, 5 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Promoting Whom? */

2007-01-06T04:34:14Z

Promoting Whom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 6 January 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)		**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)		***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)
			****** Good point. How's <nowiki>{{image-NonHeroesPromotional}}</nowiki>? Or do we scrap the whole idea altogether? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:34, 5 January 2007 (EST)

	== Ugh! ==		== Ugh! ==
	Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:		Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:

imported>Hardvice: fix nowikis

2007-01-06T04:17:32Z

fix nowikis

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 6 January 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)		*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)		**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	***** That's fine, but <tt>{{image-promotional}}</tt> vs. <tt>{{image-promo}}</tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)		***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	== Ugh! ==		== Ugh! ==
	Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:		Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:

imported>Hardvice at 04:16, 6 January 2007

2007-01-06T04:16:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 6 January 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)		*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)		**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)
			***** That's fine, but <tt>{{image-promotional}}</tt> vs. <tt>{{image-promo}}</tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)

	== Ugh! ==		== Ugh! ==
	Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:		Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Promoting Whom? */

2007-01-06T04:10:56Z

Promoting Whom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 6 January 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	***If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))		***If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))
	*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)		*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)
			**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)
⚫	== Ugh! ==

		⚫	== Ugh! ==
	Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:		Okay, I tried to remove some of the images from this category (images that are not ''Heroes''-centric promotional images). But I forgot that the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> automatically puts the pic in the category. I see three options:
	# manually turn off the auto category addition on select pictures (is this possible?)		# manually turn off the auto category addition on select pictures (is this possible?)

imported>Hardvice at 04:07, 6 January 2007

2007-01-06T04:07:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:07, 6 January 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	**# If the category is only going to refer to images meant to promote Heroes then I think it should not be auto-included in <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> since Heroes-specific promotional images will only be a subset of all the possible images marked with that template.		**# If the category is only going to refer to images meant to promote Heroes then I think it should not be auto-included in <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> since Heroes-specific promotional images will only be a subset of all the possible images marked with that template.
	***If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))		***If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))
			*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)

	== Ugh! ==		== Ugh! ==

imported>Admin: fixing bulleting best as possible

2007-01-06T04:05:09Z

fixing bulleting best as possible

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:05, 6 January 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	**# The category description should be changed so it's not Heroes specific. This would make the most sense given the general name of the category.		**# The category description should be changed so it's not Heroes specific. This would make the most sense given the general name of the category.
	**# If the category is only going to refer to images meant to promote Heroes then I think it should not be auto-included in <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> since Heroes-specific promotional images will only be a subset of all the possible images marked with that template.		**# If the category is only going to refer to images meant to promote Heroes then I think it should not be auto-included in <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> since Heroes-specific promotional images will only be a subset of all the possible images marked with that template.
	If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))		***If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))

	== Ugh! ==		== Ugh! ==

imported>Admin: /* Promoting Whom? */

2007-01-06T04:02:18Z

Promoting Whom?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 6 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	** <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> is a generic template for promotional images whether they specifically promote Heroes or not. I think the category description is too specific to be honest. So in my opinion one of two things should happen:		** <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> is a generic template for promotional images whether they specifically promote Heroes or not. I think the category description is too specific to be honest. So in my opinion one of two things should happen:
	**# The category description should be changed so it's not Heroes specific. This would make the most sense given the general name of the category.		**# The category description should be changed so it's not Heroes specific. This would make the most sense given the general name of the category.
	**# If the category is only going to refer to images meant to promote Heroes then I think it should not be auto-included in <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> since Heroes-specific promotional images will only be a subset of all the possible images marked with that template. ~~([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))~~		**# If the category is only going to refer to images meant to promote Heroes then I think it should not be auto-included in <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> since Heroes-specific promotional images will only be a subset of all the possible images marked with that template.
			If there's value in specifically categorizing Heroes-specific promotional images, then I'd suggest using a different template. Maybe a <nowiki>{{image-heroespromotional}}</nowiki> that transcludes <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> but also includes a "Heroes Promotional Images" category afterwards. But I dont know if there's value in distinguishing. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:57, 5 January 2007 (EST))

	== Ugh! ==		== Ugh! ==

imported>Admin: /* Ugh! */

2007-01-06T03:58:30Z

Ugh!

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:58, 6 January 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	# change the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> tag to something else.		# change the <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> tag to something else.
	Thoughts? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 22:44, 5 January 2007 (EST)		Thoughts? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 22:44, 5 January 2007 (EST)
			:See my comment above. :) I think the solution to that may also solve this. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 22:58, 5 January 2007 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 6 January 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)		*** I tend to agree. As long as the source is acknowledged, I don't see the value in distinguishing NBC/Heroes promotions from others (with the exception of IMDb images, which, as noted above, aren't always promotional). I think the category should match the template, not vice-versa.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:07, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)		**** I don't know why, but it really irks me to have Heroes-promo images mixed with just cast images from their websites. I like the idea of a separate template for non-Heroes promotional images. The only thing I'd suggest is that we leave <nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki> as a Heroes-promo template, and the new template for general (non-Heroes) promotion should be called something like <nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki>. This way, we wouldn't have to change so many of the templates - just a handful of non-Heroes images. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:10, 5 January 2007 (EST)
			***** Ok, I'm going to "go there". :) Why does it irk you? What's the value in distinguishing between them? (Mostly playing devil's advocate here). ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:02, 6 January 2007 (EST))
	***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)		***** That's fine, but <tt><nowiki>{{image-promotional}}</nowiki></tt> vs. <tt><nowiki>{{image-promo}}</nowiki></tt> sounds like a disaster waiting to happen. The template name should give a better clue as to which is which.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:16, 5 January 2007 (EST)
	****** Good point. How's <nowiki>{{image-NonHeroesPromotional}}</nowiki>? Or do we scrap the whole idea altogether? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:34, 5 January 2007 (EST)		****** Good point. How's <nowiki>{{image-NonHeroesPromotional}}</nowiki>? Or do we scrap the whole idea altogether? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 23:34, 5 January 2007 (EST)