Fan Creation talk:Paire - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Talk:Paire moved to Fan Creation talk:Paire: move out of main namespace and into Fan Creation namespace

2010-02-12T03:22:14Z

Talk:Paire moved to Fan Creation talk:Paire: move out of main namespace and into Fan Creation namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 12 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Talk:Paire moved to Fan Creation talk:Paire: move out of main namespace and into Fan Creation namespace

2010-02-12T03:22:14Z

Talk:Paire moved to Fan Creation talk:Paire: move out of main namespace and into Fan Creation namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:22, 12 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>PJDEP at 00:36, 6 January 2010

2010-01-06T00:36:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 6 January 2010
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)		Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)
	*Even with the whole uncle/niece factor? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 19:02, 5 January 2010 (EST)		*Even with the whole uncle/niece factor? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 19:02, 5 January 2010 (EST)
			**Well, when you put it like that, no. I somehow forgot about that lol. That's incest though, not statutory rape.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 19:36, 5 January 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark at 00:02, 6 January 2010

2010-01-06T00:02:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 6 January 2010
Line 82:		Line 82:

	Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)		Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)
			*Even with the whole uncle/niece factor? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 19:02, 5 January 2010 (EST)

imported>PJDEP at 04:46, 5 January 2010

2010-01-05T04:46:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:46, 5 January 2010
Line 78:		Line 78:

	Really needs an update and filling in the stubs. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 20:30, 18 October 2009 (EDT)		Really needs an update and filling in the stubs. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 20:30, 18 October 2009 (EDT)

			== Statutory rape ==

			Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Update */ new section

2009-10-19T00:30:18Z

Update: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 19 October 2009
Line 74:		Line 74:

	You better believe it. [http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/hot_heroes] {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 06:53, 9 January 2008 (EST)		You better believe it. [http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/hot_heroes] {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 06:53, 9 January 2008 (EST)

			== Update ==

			Really needs an update and filling in the stubs. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 20:30, 18 October 2009 (EDT)

imported>Theinquisitivebookworm at 19:59, 28 April 2009

2009-04-28T19:59:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 28 April 2009
Line 68:		Line 68:
	******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)		******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)
	*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)		*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)

	-Claire is 17! It was revealed in the episode Exposed. Peter is 27 according to his page on Heroes Wiki.
	********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)		********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Theinquisitivebookworm: -

2009-04-28T19:58:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 28 April 2009
Line 68:		Line 68:
	******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)		******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)
	*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)		*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)
			-Claire is 17! It was revealed in the episode Exposed. Peter is 27 according to his page on Heroes Wiki.
	********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)		********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)

imported>Arkillion at 16:30, 11 February 2009

2009-02-11T16:30:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:30, 11 February 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	***** As used at Tolkien Gateway, "fanon" is information that is widely believed to be authentic, but has no actual basis in "canon" source material. I don't know if that's exactly what you want for this category. Right now, I'd consider any kind of romantic relationship between Claire and Peter to be pure speculation, and move it to the Speculation page as such. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 15:27, 29 December 2006 (EST)		***** As used at Tolkien Gateway, "fanon" is information that is widely believed to be authentic, but has no actual basis in "canon" source material. I don't know if that's exactly what you want for this category. Right now, I'd consider any kind of romantic relationship between Claire and Peter to be pure speculation, and move it to the Speculation page as such. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 15:27, 29 December 2006 (EST)

			==[[Petaire]]==

			Sounds better than "Paire" which sounds like the actual fruit :o --[[User:Arkillion\|Arkillion]] 11:30, 11 February 2009 (EST)

	==[[Clach]]==		==[[Clach]]==

imported>UrNoob: /* Peter is Claire's uncle */

2008-12-23T05:33:12Z

Peter is Claire's uncle

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 23 December 2008
Line 54:		Line 54:
	Given the fact that this show is international but produced by a USA ''national'' company, all references to seperate states will '''not''' be introduced into the show. Firstly, it's too complicated. Secondly, NY and TX state laws won't matter when people write in and sue. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 15:06, 13 February 2007 (EST)		Given the fact that this show is international but produced by a USA ''national'' company, all references to seperate states will '''not''' be introduced into the show. Firstly, it's too complicated. Secondly, NY and TX state laws won't matter when people write in and sue. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 15:06, 13 February 2007 (EST)
	* I'm not quite sure what these statements mean. ^^ The show itself refers to different states and countries each time it shows them in the captions. I'm also not sure what these people would be writing in and suing for but if they're filing suit then laws do matter. I do agree though with what I think you're saying in that any discussion of these distinctions between laws of different states, while amusing and educational, is a bit beyond the scope of a fan wiki. Unless future episodes do play out some romantic interest, which seems unlikely according to what the creators have said, there's no need to continue this topic. =) --[[User:Glue\|Glue]] 21:48, 13 February 2007 (EST)		* I'm not quite sure what these statements mean. ^^ The show itself refers to different states and countries each time it shows them in the captions. I'm also not sure what these people would be writing in and suing for but if they're filing suit then laws do matter. I do agree though with what I think you're saying in that any discussion of these distinctions between laws of different states, while amusing and educational, is a bit beyond the scope of a fan wiki. Unless future episodes do play out some romantic interest, which seems unlikely according to what the creators have said, there's no need to continue this topic. =) --[[User:Glue\|Glue]] 21:48, 13 February 2007 (EST)
	:To Quote 4-chan, Incest is ''win''cest [[User:~~UrNooob~~\|Max]] 00:32, 23 December 2008 (EST)		:To Quote 4-chan, Incest is ''win''cest [[User:UrNoob\|Max]] 00:32, 23 December 2008 (EST)

	==Claire's Age, Part 2==		==Claire's Age, Part 2==

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:36, 6 January 2010
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)		Just something people should know, 18 is not the legal age of consent in all states. For instance, it's 17 in New York, 16 in Alabama and 14 in Iowa (if the partner is no more the four years older). Anyway, I'm not sure of the age of consent is in California or Texas, but depending on that a possible Paire relationship may not have been illegal.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 23:46, 4 January 2010 (EST)
	*Even with the whole uncle/niece factor? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 19:02, 5 January 2010 (EST)		*Even with the whole uncle/niece factor? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 19:02, 5 January 2010 (EST)
			**Well, when you put it like that, no. I somehow forgot about that lol. That's incest though, not statutory rape.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 19:36, 5 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 28 April 2009
Line 68:		Line 68:
	******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)		******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)
	*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)		*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)

	-Claire is 17! It was revealed in the episode Exposed. Peter is 27 according to his page on Heroes Wiki.
	********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)		********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 28 April 2009
Line 68:		Line 68:
	******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)		******18 months can be an approximation and the newspaper can be wrong. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 13:17, 14 February 2007 (EST)
	*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)		*******Which is exactly what Ryan said already. However, that doesn't change the fact that the most reliable source we have, Claire, says "nearly 16". This is corroborated by the newspaper, and Meredith's claim that she ''is'' sixteen is easily reconciled as either approximation or the error of a mother who hasn't seen her daughter in fourteen years and doesn't seem to have that much interest in her as anything but a cash cow anyway. Taking all three statements as a whole, I agree with Ryan 100%: she's 15, nearly 16. Two out of three canon sources agree, and the third is less reliable than the other two, and reconcilable as approximation.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:25, 14 February 2007 (EST)
			-Claire is 17! It was revealed in the episode Exposed. Peter is 27 according to his page on Heroes Wiki.
	********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)		********Changed the age to reflect Claire's age more clearly and accurately. --[[User:Gargyloveswolfy\|Gargyloveswolfy]] 14:10, 14 February 2007 (EST)