Graphic Novel talk:War Buddies, Part 5 - Revision history

imported>Yoshi n1: red link, lol only 205 red links to go

2010-02-04T11:42:27Z

red link, lol only 205 red links to go

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 4 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>Yoshi n1: red link, lol only 205 red links to go

2010-02-04T11:42:27Z

red link, lol only 205 red links to go

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:42, 4 February 2010
Line 21:		Line 21:

	Update [[Main Page]]: <br>		Update [[Main Page]]: <br>
	_X_ [[Template:aotw]] and [[Heroes Wiki:Article of the Week\|archive]] (if needed)<br>
	_X_ [[Template:Index]] <br>		_X_ [[Template:Index]] <br>

imported>Iheartheroes: /* New graphic novel checklist */ one more left!!

2009-08-18T00:31:41Z

New graphic novel checklist: one more left!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 18 August 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	_X_ Summary <br>		_X_ Summary <br>
	_X_ Easter Egg<br>		_X_ Easter Egg<br>
	~~___~~ Trivia <br>		_X_ Trivia <br>

	Update/add other articles:<br>		Update/add other articles:<br>
Line 49:		Line 49:

	Timeline<br>		Timeline<br>
	~~___~~ Update [[timeline]]<br>		_X_ Update [[timeline]]<br>

	Update templates as needed <br>		Update templates as needed <br>

imported>Admin: Talk:Graphic Novel:War Buddies, Part 5 moved to Graphic Novel talk:War Buddies, Part 5: Moving talk pages into new namespace

2007-06-23T02:54:27Z

[[Talk:Graphic Novel:War Buddies, Part 5]] moved to Graphic Novel talk:War Buddies, Part 5: Moving talk pages into new namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:54, 23 June 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: remove red link to GNPlace

2007-05-22T01:05:01Z

remove red link to GNPlace

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 22 May 2007
Line 54:		Line 54:
	_X_ [[Template: GN]] <br>		_X_ [[Template: GN]] <br>
	_X_ [[Template: GNcharacternav]] <br>		_X_ [[Template: GNcharacternav]] <br>
	_X_ [[Template: GNPlace]] <br>
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

imported>Hardvice: update

2007-04-16T19:09:36Z

update

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 16 April 2007
Line 37:		Line 37:
	___ (list themes referenced here) <br>		___ (list themes referenced here) <br>

	\|[[:Category:Events\|Events]]/[[:Category:Items\|Items]]/[[:Category:Things\|Things]]/[[:Category:References\|References]] <br>
	___ (list other articles to update here)<br>
	___ (list new articles here) <br>
	___ Update [[Portal:Portals\|Portals]] as needed<br>

	[[:Category: Graphic Novel Locations\| Locations]] <br>		[[:Category: Graphic Novel Locations\| Locations]] <br>
	_n/a_ Update [[Portal:Graphic Novel Locations]]<br>		_n/a_ Update [[Portal:Graphic Novel Locations]]<br>
Line 51:		Line 46:
	_X_ [[Central Park]] <br>		_X_ [[Central Park]] <br>
	_X_ [[Mr. and Mrs. Petrelli's home]] <br>		_X_ [[Mr. and Mrs. Petrelli's home]] <br>
	~~___~~ Update [[Portal:Graphic Novel Places]]<br>		_X_ Update [[Portal:Graphic Novel Places]]<br>

	Timeline<br>		Timeline<br>
Line 59:		Line 54:
	_X_ [[Template: GN]] <br>		_X_ [[Template: GN]] <br>
	_X_ [[Template: GNcharacternav]] <br>		_X_ [[Template: GNcharacternav]] <br>
	~~___~~ [[Template: GNPlace]] <br>		_X_ [[Template: GNPlace]] <br>
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

imported>Heroe: /* Peter or Nathan? */ - stray link

2007-04-13T21:34:40Z

Peter or Nathan?: - stray link

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 13 April 2007
Line 104:		Line 104:
	*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down Nathan's birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down Nathan's birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	[http://www.example.com link title]

	== WBP6 ==		== WBP6 ==

imported>E rowe: /* Peter or Nathan? */ changed "of" to "or"

2007-04-13T21:28:39Z

Peter or Nathan?: changed "of" to "or"

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:28, 13 April 2007
Line 99:		Line 99:
	So I went ahead and made a very rough article. I was encountering some problems with the Portal:Places for GN's, so whomever can get that done, that'll work. Time for bed.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 02:29, 10 April 2007 (EDT)		So I went ahead and made a very rough article. I was encountering some problems with the Portal:Places for GN's, so whomever can get that done, that'll work. Time for bed.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 02:29, 10 April 2007 (EDT)

	== Peter of Nathan? ==		== Peter or Nathan? ==

	Heroeswiki seems to be taking for granted that the infant son in this GN is Nathan. Why is that? In the scene at the end of this GN, Mr. Petrelli mentions that he has a wife and family, not a wife and son. Also, when Linderman shows up, Mr. Petrelli says he looks older. So at least a few years have gone by, maybe a decade or more. It is possible that this occurs as late as 1981, when Peter would be an infant. On the other hand, we don't know Nathan's exact age. But, since he's Claire's father, he was probably already born by 1967, or some other time prior to the Au Co incident, making him at least 23 when Claire was born in 1990-91. If this is the case, then he could just barely be the child in this GN if the last scene occurs in 1970 or before, which is doubtful IMHO. Otherwise, Nathan could have been conceived immediately after his father returned from Vietnam and born in 1969, just to be 21 when Claire is born, which is also possible, but it rather limits the chronological options to claim with certainty that this is Nathan. Of course, there may have been something else I missed completely.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 21:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		Heroeswiki seems to be taking for granted that the infant son in this GN is Nathan. Why is that? In the scene at the end of this GN, Mr. Petrelli mentions that he has a wife and family, not a wife and son. Also, when Linderman shows up, Mr. Petrelli says he looks older. So at least a few years have gone by, maybe a decade or more. It is possible that this occurs as late as 1981, when Peter would be an infant. On the other hand, we don't know Nathan's exact age. But, since he's Claire's father, he was probably already born by 1967, or some other time prior to the Au Co incident, making him at least 23 when Claire was born in 1990-91. If this is the case, then he could just barely be the child in this GN if the last scene occurs in 1970 or before, which is doubtful IMHO. Otherwise, Nathan could have been conceived immediately after his father returned from Vietnam and born in 1969, just to be 21 when Claire is born, which is also possible, but it rather limits the chronological options to claim with certainty that this is Nathan. Of course, there may have been something else I missed completely.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 21:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down Nathan's birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down Nathan's birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
			[http://www.example.com link title]

	== WBP6 ==		== WBP6 ==

imported>E rowe: /* Peter of Nathan? */

2007-04-13T02:13:43Z

Peter of Nathan?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:13, 13 April 2007
Line 103:		Line 103:
	Heroeswiki seems to be taking for granted that the infant son in this GN is Nathan. Why is that? In the scene at the end of this GN, Mr. Petrelli mentions that he has a wife and family, not a wife and son. Also, when Linderman shows up, Mr. Petrelli says he looks older. So at least a few years have gone by, maybe a decade or more. It is possible that this occurs as late as 1981, when Peter would be an infant. On the other hand, we don't know Nathan's exact age. But, since he's Claire's father, he was probably already born by 1967, or some other time prior to the Au Co incident, making him at least 23 when Claire was born in 1990-91. If this is the case, then he could just barely be the child in this GN if the last scene occurs in 1970 or before, which is doubtful IMHO. Otherwise, Nathan could have been conceived immediately after his father returned from Vietnam and born in 1969, just to be 21 when Claire is born, which is also possible, but it rather limits the chronological options to claim with certainty that this is Nathan. Of course, there may have been something else I missed completely.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 21:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		Heroeswiki seems to be taking for granted that the infant son in this GN is Nathan. Why is that? In the scene at the end of this GN, Mr. Petrelli mentions that he has a wife and family, not a wife and son. Also, when Linderman shows up, Mr. Petrelli says he looks older. So at least a few years have gone by, maybe a decade or more. It is possible that this occurs as late as 1981, when Peter would be an infant. On the other hand, we don't know Nathan's exact age. But, since he's Claire's father, he was probably already born by 1967, or some other time prior to the Au Co incident, making him at least 23 when Claire was born in 1990-91. If this is the case, then he could just barely be the child in this GN if the last scene occurs in 1970 or before, which is doubtful IMHO. Otherwise, Nathan could have been conceived immediately after his father returned from Vietnam and born in 1969, just to be 21 when Claire is born, which is also possible, but it rather limits the chronological options to claim with certainty that this is Nathan. Of course, there may have been something else I missed completely.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 21:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down ~~Peter~~'s birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down Nathan's birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

	== WBP6 ==		== WBP6 ==

imported>E rowe: /* Peter of Nathan? */

2007-04-13T02:12:25Z

Peter of Nathan?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 13 April 2007
Line 103:		Line 103:
	Heroeswiki seems to be taking for granted that the infant son in this GN is Nathan. Why is that? In the scene at the end of this GN, Mr. Petrelli mentions that he has a wife and family, not a wife and son. Also, when Linderman shows up, Mr. Petrelli says he looks older. So at least a few years have gone by, maybe a decade or more. It is possible that this occurs as late as 1981, when Peter would be an infant. On the other hand, we don't know Nathan's exact age. But, since he's Claire's father, he was probably already born by 1967, or some other time prior to the Au Co incident, making him at least 23 when Claire was born in 1990-91. If this is the case, then he could just barely be the child in this GN if the last scene occurs in 1970 or before, which is doubtful IMHO. Otherwise, Nathan could have been conceived immediately after his father returned from Vietnam and born in 1969, just to be 21 when Claire is born, which is also possible, but it rather limits the chronological options to claim with certainty that this is Nathan. Of course, there may have been something else I missed completely.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 21:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		Heroeswiki seems to be taking for granted that the infant son in this GN is Nathan. Why is that? In the scene at the end of this GN, Mr. Petrelli mentions that he has a wife and family, not a wife and son. Also, when Linderman shows up, Mr. Petrelli says he looks older. So at least a few years have gone by, maybe a decade or more. It is possible that this occurs as late as 1981, when Peter would be an infant. On the other hand, we don't know Nathan's exact age. But, since he's Claire's father, he was probably already born by 1967, or some other time prior to the Au Co incident, making him at least 23 when Claire was born in 1990-91. If this is the case, then he could just barely be the child in this GN if the last scene occurs in 1970 or before, which is doubtful IMHO. Otherwise, Nathan could have been conceived immediately after his father returned from Vietnam and born in 1969, just to be 21 when Claire is born, which is also possible, but it rather limits the chronological options to claim with certainty that this is Nathan. Of course, there may have been something else I missed completely.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 21:37, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*It's great that you're looking for speculation--thanks for keeping us on our toes. :) First, the letter Dallas received in ''[[War Buddies, Part 2]]'' mentions a son. Second, the kid playing with the flying toys looks like Nathan. But really, the reason we are justified in saying that the kid is Nathan is because [[Jason Badower]] says so on his [http://jasonbadower.blogspot.com/2007/04/war-buddies-part-4-page-2.html blog]. In fact, he even alludes to the idea that when Linderman visits Mr. Petrelli, that it could be the next day (though I think he mentions that on a [http://www.9thwonders.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=53571&st=80&p=214976&#entry214976 9thwonders.com post]). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:02, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
			** OK, that's good enough for me. But it looks like they didn't straighten out the War Buddies story line. I can't see how it could possibly be the next day, especially from Petrelli's comment about Linderman looking older. But that's a good catch about the letter. That nails down Peter's birth year to around 1967, I'd say.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 22:12, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

	== WBP6 ==		== WBP6 ==