Help talk:Collapsible tables - Revision history

imported>Hardvice at 17:17, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T17:17:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 28 October 2007
(No difference)

imported>Hardvice at 17:17, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T17:17:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 28 October 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	****** That's not what I meant. I mean, we could either do a style change in javascript such that if the browser is Firefox, it automatically sets the style width to 100%, or we could try an extra iteration or two of ToggleTableView, (kind of how the TOC link names get updated). Any preference?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		****** That's not what I meant. I mean, we could either do a style change in javascript such that if the browser is Firefox, it automatically sets the style width to 100%, or we could try an extra iteration or two of ToggleTableView, (kind of how the TOC link names get updated). Any preference?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			******* I know that's not what you meant. I was suggesting something simpler that doesn't require more JavaScript. Adding a width fixes the problem.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:17, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: Preference

2007-10-28T17:13:47Z

Preference

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 28 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			****** That's not what I meant. I mean, we could either do a style change in javascript such that if the browser is Firefox, it automatically sets the style width to 100%, or we could try an extra iteration or two of ToggleTableView, (kind of how the TOC link names get updated). Any preference?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 16:48, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T16:48:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 28 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts at 16:44, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T16:44:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 28 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	**** Ok, I set you up for that one. ;) I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: Re: Solution

2007-10-28T16:44:03Z

Re: Solution

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 28 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			**** Ok, I set you up for that one. ;) I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 16:34, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T16:34:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:34, 28 October 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: Firefox only?

2007-10-28T16:29:08Z

Firefox only?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 28 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So ... anybody know why the autocollapsed tables on [[Special:Upload]] have to be clicked twice to get them to open?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:16, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		So ... anybody know why the autocollapsed tables on [[Special:Upload]] have to be clicked twice to get them to open?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:16, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Admin: i see it now, deleting comment

2007-10-28T06:49:10Z

i see it now, deleting comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, 28 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So ... anybody know why the autocollapsed tables on [[Special:Upload]] have to be clicked twice to get them to open?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:16, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		So ... anybody know why the autocollapsed tables on [[Special:Upload]] have to be clicked twice to get them to open?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:16, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	** Hmm. Only takes one click for me. Do you have that preference enabled where you can double-click on a section to edit it or something? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT))

imported>Admin at 06:48, 28 October 2007

2007-10-28T06:48:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:48, 28 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So ... anybody know why the autocollapsed tables on [[Special:Upload]] have to be clicked twice to get them to open?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:16, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		So ... anybody know why the autocollapsed tables on [[Special:Upload]] have to be clicked twice to get them to open?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:16, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		* Incidentally, it only seems to do it in Firefox, not IE. It seems to be the lack of a <code>width</code> declaration, but width: auto doesn't fix it, and min-width doesn't seem to work.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 02:26, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			** Hmm. Only takes one click for me. Do you have that preference enabled where you can double-click on a section to edit it or something? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:17, 28 October 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	****** That's not what I meant. I mean, we could either do a style change in javascript such that if the browser is Firefox, it automatically sets the style width to 100%, or we could try an extra iteration or two of ToggleTableView, (kind of how the TOC link names get updated). Any preference?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		****** That's not what I meant. I mean, we could either do a style change in javascript such that if the browser is Firefox, it automatically sets the style width to 100%, or we could try an extra iteration or two of ToggleTableView, (kind of how the TOC link names get updated). Any preference?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			******* I know that's not what you meant. I was suggesting something simpler that doesn't require more JavaScript. Adding a width fixes the problem.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:17, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:13, 28 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			****** That's not what I meant. I mean, we could either do a style change in javascript such that if the browser is Firefox, it automatically sets the style width to 100%, or we could try an extra iteration or two of ToggleTableView, (kind of how the TOC link names get updated). Any preference?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 13:13, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:48, 28 October 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			***** For the tables in question, we could just put in <code>width: 100%</code>. It would make them wider than they need to be when collapsed, but they should still balance automatically. Anything less than 100% wouldn't let them expand widely enough when uncollpased.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:48, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 28 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	**** Ok, I set you up for that one. ;) I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		**** Heh, I set you up for that one... I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 28 October 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		** Does it do it in Opera too, or this solely a Firefox bug? Guess this one of the rare times Firefox isn't better than IE. ;)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:29, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)		*** I only use Opera on the Wii, but Safari doesn't do it. As for IE doing it "better", I think it doesn't have the same problem because IE actually loads and displays everything expanded/non-collapsible first, then applies the Javascript, whereas Firefox just renders everything in one go. I guess it depends on your definition of "better".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:34, 28 October 2007 (EDT)
			**** Ok, I set you up for that one. ;) I guess the solution should be Firefox specific? I think we could put a catch that if the firefox is the browser, to run an extra execution of "toggleTableView". That may fix the display to load correctly. The alternative is to force a table width if the browser is Firefox. Opinions?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 12:44, 28 October 2007 (EDT)