Help talk:Consensus checks - Revision history

imported>Referos at 19:56, 12 December 2009

2009-12-12T19:56:48Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:56, 12 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Referos at 19:56, 12 December 2009

2009-12-12T19:56:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:56, 12 December 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)		Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
	* <s>Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.</s>		* <s>Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.</s>
	* Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.		* <s>Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.</s>
	* <s>Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference. </s>		* <s>Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference. </s>
	* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.		* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.

imported>Jenx222 at 17:57, 12 December 2009

2009-12-12T17:57:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 12 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Notes==		==Notes==
	Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)		Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
	* Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.		* <s>Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.</s>
	* Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.		* Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.
	* Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference.		* <s>Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference. </s>
	* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.		* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.
	* How does this work for character names and the like? (We usually don't have issues with anything but power names...why is that?)		* How does this work for character names and the like? (We usually don't have issues with anything but power names...why is that?)
	* See [[Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal#Consensus checks]].		* See [[Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal#Consensus checks]].
	* See [[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart#consensus checks]]		* See [[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart#consensus checks]]
	* Names can be crossed out when there is legitimate opposition.		* <s>Names can be crossed out when there is legitimate opposition.</s>
	* Formalize where discussions should go...		* Formalize where discussions should go...
	* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)		* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Referos: /* Notes */

2009-12-12T14:44:41Z

Notes

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 12 December 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* Formalize where discussions should go...		* Formalize where discussions should go...
	* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)		* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
			** What happens if someone gives a legitimate opposition to a name, but another person also gives a legitimate counterargument to the opposition?--[[User:Referos\|Referos]] 09:44, 12 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Radicell: Help talk:Concensus checks moved to Help talk:Consensus checks over redirect: dammit

2009-12-12T13:49:33Z

Help talk:Concensus checks moved to Help talk:Consensus checks over redirect: dammit

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 12 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Radicell: Help talk:Consensus checks moved to Help talk:Concensus checks: wrong spelling

2009-12-12T13:49:02Z

Help talk:Consensus checks moved to Help talk:Concensus checks: wrong spelling

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 12 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Radicell: Reverted edits by Yoshi n1 (Talk); changed back to last version by Ryangibsonstewart

2009-12-12T13:17:35Z

Reverted edits by Yoshi n1 (Talk); changed back to last version by Ryangibsonstewart

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:17, 12 December 2009
Line 1:	Line 1:
		==Notes==
		Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
		* Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.
		* Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.
		* Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference.
		* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.
		* How does this work for character names and the like? (We usually don't have issues with anything but power names...why is that?)
		* See [[Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal#Consensus checks]].
		* See [[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart#consensus checks]]
		* Names can be crossed out when there is legitimate opposition.
		* Formalize where discussions should go...
		* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Yoshi n1: Removing all content from page

2009-12-12T13:13:06Z

Removing all content from page

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:13, 12 December 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Notes==
	Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
	* Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.
	* Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.
	* Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference.
	* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.
	* How does this work for character names and the like? (We usually don't have issues with anything but power names...why is that?)
	* See [[Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal#Consensus checks]].
	* See [[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart#consensus checks]]
	* Names can be crossed out when there is legitimate opposition.
	* Formalize where discussions should go...
	* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: ==Notes== Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) ~~~~ * Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better. * Possessor names shouldn't be opposed....

2009-04-27T00:31:44Z

New page: ==Notes== Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) ~~~~ * Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better. * Possessor names shouldn't be opposed....

New page

==Notes==
Some notes for things this page should include. Feel free to add. :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)
* Names shouldn't be opposed based on another name being better.
* Possessor names shouldn't be opposed. They shouldn't even be part of the consensus check.
* Opposition should be based on validity and not on personal preference.
* If two or more names remain, and there is a clear favorite, that's the name that gets chosen. If there's no clear favorite, a traditional vote can be held.
* How does this work for character names and the like? (We usually don't have issues with anything but power names...why is that?)
* See [[Heroes Wiki talk:Community Portal#Consensus checks]].
* See [[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart#consensus checks]]
* Names can be crossed out when there is legitimate opposition.
* Formalize where discussions should go...
* Anything else? :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:31, 26 April 2009 (EDT)