Heroes Wiki talk:Logo contest/Archive 1 - Revision history

imported>Heroe: rmv red link

2007-06-03T02:46:06Z

rmv red link

← Older revision	Revision as of 02:46, 3 June 2007
(No difference)

imported>Heroe: rmv red link

2007-06-03T02:46:06Z

rmv red link

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 3 June 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:
	*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)		*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)
	* Oh, darn! I have a really good idea for a logo, but I don't have the technology to make it. :-( -- Heroe 9:01, 21 November 2006 (EST)		* Oh, darn! I have a really good idea for a logo, but I don't have the technology to make it. :-( -- Heroe 9:01, 21 November 2006 (EST)
	[[Link title]]

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: archive

2007-06-02T21:32:27Z

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Talk:Logo contest moved to Heroes Wiki talk:Logo contest/Archive 1: belongs in HW namespace

2007-06-02T21:30:20Z

Talk:Logo contest moved to Heroes Wiki talk:Logo contest/Archive 1: belongs in HW namespace

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:30, 2 June 2007
(No difference)

imported>Zeckalpha: Acknowledgement of change

2007-02-24T23:15:13Z

Acknowledgement of change

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:15, 24 February 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	[[Image:Heroes-wiki.gif]]		[[Image:Heroes-wiki.gif]]
	***This is a problem that still hasn't been fixed... The weird line has been bothering me. -[[User:Zeckalpha\|Zeckalpha]] 17:24, 24 February 2007 (EST)		***This is a problem that still hasn't been fixed... The weird line has been bothering me. -[[User:Zeckalpha\|Zeckalpha]] 17:24, 24 February 2007 (EST)
			****Thanks -[[User:Zeckalpha\|Zeckalpha]] 18:15, 24 February 2007 (EST)
	* Perhaps it would be better looking, if CD add the heroes line also in front of the book, in the middle of the eclipse. Because i'm not sure if people can clearly see the heroes letters. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 15:15, 15 November 2006 (CET)		* Perhaps it would be better looking, if CD add the heroes line also in front of the book, in the middle of the eclipse. Because i'm not sure if people can clearly see the heroes letters. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 15:15, 15 November 2006 (CET)

imported>Zeckalpha: Bumped Suggestion to fix transparency issues on Current Logo

2007-02-24T22:24:05Z

Bumped Suggestion to fix transparency issues on Current Logo

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:24, 24 February 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:
	** This is what the image would look like in actuality. The gallery resize isn't as accurate. Plus I took out the surrounding white area and made it transparent instead so it blends into the background better. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:09, 14 November 2006 (EST))		** This is what the image would look like in actuality. The gallery resize isn't as accurate. Plus I took out the surrounding white area and made it transparent instead so it blends into the background better. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 18:09, 14 November 2006 (EST))
	[[Image:Heroes-wiki.gif]]		[[Image:Heroes-wiki.gif]]
			***This is a problem that still hasn't been fixed... The weird line has been bothering me. -[[User:Zeckalpha\|Zeckalpha]] 17:24, 24 February 2007 (EST)
	* Perhaps it would be better looking, if CD add the heroes line also in front of the book, in the middle of the eclipse. Because i'm not sure if people can clearly see the heroes letters. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 15:15, 15 November 2006 (CET)		* Perhaps it would be better looking, if CD add the heroes line also in front of the book, in the middle of the eclipse. Because i'm not sure if people can clearly see the heroes letters. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 15:15, 15 November 2006 (CET)

imported>Heroe at 05:02, 22 November 2006

2006-11-22T05:02:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 22 November 2006
Line 20:		Line 20:

	*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)		*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)
			* Oh, darn! I have a really good idea for a logo, but I don't have the technology to make it. :-( -- Heroe 9:01, 21 November 2006 (EST)

imported>Fcphantom: test run suggestion

2006-11-20T06:37:52Z

test run suggestion

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 20 November 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)		*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)
	**Nice change![[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 22:42, 19 November 2006 (EST)		**Nice change![[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 22:42, 19 November 2006 (EST)

			*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: nice change

2006-11-20T03:42:37Z

nice change

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:42, 20 November 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)		*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)
			**Nice change![[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 22:42, 19 November 2006 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Hardvice's new logo

2006-11-19T04:32:39Z

Hardvice's new logo

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 19 November 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* The new one by Blackthir13en looks very cool. It also has the wanted comic-look. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 11:08, 18 November 2006 (CET)		* The new one by Blackthir13en looks very cool. It also has the wanted comic-look. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 11:08, 18 November 2006 (CET)
	** I really like Blackthir13en's logo - very sleek and "comic booky". I also like the use of The Symbol ... I just don't get the cursing marks (!@#). [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 15:06, 18 November 2006 (EST)		** I really like Blackthir13en's logo - very sleek and "comic booky". I also like the use of The Symbol ... I just don't get the cursing marks (!@#). [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 15:06, 18 November 2006 (EST)

			*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 2 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{archivepage}}
	* Hey, the new one (Cdharrison 8:46am / 11.14.2006) is awesome!!! I love it! --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 15:38, 14 November 2006 (CET)		* Hey, the new one (Cdharrison 8:46am / 11.14.2006) is awesome!!! I love it! --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 15:38, 14 November 2006 (CET)
	** I've seen two votes for Cdharrison's so far. Any other opinions on it? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:33, 14 November 2006 (EST))		** I've seen two votes for Cdharrison's so far. Any other opinions on it? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:33, 14 November 2006 (EST))
Line 23:		Line 24:
	*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)		*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)
	* Oh, darn! I have a really good idea for a logo, but I don't have the technology to make it. :-( -- Heroe 9:01, 21 November 2006 (EST)		* Oh, darn! I have a really good idea for a logo, but I don't have the technology to make it. :-( -- Heroe 9:01, 21 November 2006 (EST)
			[[Link title]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:37, 20 November 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)		*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)
	**Nice change![[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 22:42, 19 November 2006 (EST)		**Nice change![[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 22:42, 19 November 2006 (EST)

			*Since we have two or three entries that are pretty seriously better than our current logo, I suggest that we have a test run for a few of our top candidates. I nominate Hardvice's first since I'm curious if the detail will be cool or annoying. --[[User:Fcphantom\|Fcphantom]] 01:37, 20 November 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 19 November 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* The new one by Blackthir13en looks very cool. It also has the wanted comic-look. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 11:08, 18 November 2006 (CET)		* The new one by Blackthir13en looks very cool. It also has the wanted comic-look. --[[User:Bob\|Bob]] 11:08, 18 November 2006 (CET)
	** I really like Blackthir13en's logo - very sleek and "comic booky". I also like the use of The Symbol ... I just don't get the cursing marks (!@#). [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 15:06, 18 November 2006 (EST)		** I really like Blackthir13en's logo - very sleek and "comic booky". I also like the use of The Symbol ... I just don't get the cursing marks (!@#). [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 15:06, 18 November 2006 (EST)

			*Hardvice is really on the right track with the comic book look - nice job... I just worry if it won't read well because there's such good (or too much?) attention to detail ... [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|Ryangibsonstewart]] 23:32, 18 November 2006 (EST)