Spoiler talk:The Fix - Revision history

imported>Admin: Talk:Spoiler:The Fix moved to Spoiler talk:The Fix: Moving talk pages into new namespace

2007-06-23T04:15:18Z

[[Talk:Spoiler:The Fix]] moved to Spoiler talk:The Fix: Moving talk pages into new namespace

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:15, 23 June 2007
(No difference)

2007-06-23T04:15:18Z

[[Talk:Spoiler:The Fix]] moved to Spoiler talk:The Fix: Moving talk pages into new namespace

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 23 June 2007
(No difference)

2007-01-28T02:27:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 28 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)
	** No problem. It takes a while to get used to the formatting conventions and standards. Glad to have you here contributing in any case!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 27 January 2007 (EST)		** No problem. It takes a while to get used to the formatting conventions and standards. Glad to have you here contributing in any case!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 27 January 2007 (EST)

	== suresh- Mohinder ==

	In the write up it has "Suresh getting an unexpected visitor." Wouldn't that be Mohinder?
	I don't think Suresh is seeing anyone anytime soon.

2007-01-28T02:26:58Z

suresh- Mohinder

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:26, 28 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)
	** No problem. It takes a while to get used to the formatting conventions and standards. Glad to have you here contributing in any case!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 27 January 2007 (EST)		** No problem. It takes a while to get used to the formatting conventions and standards. Glad to have you here contributing in any case!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 27 January 2007 (EST)

			== suresh- Mohinder ==

			In the write up it has "Suresh getting an unexpected visitor." Wouldn't that be Mohinder?
			I don't think Suresh is seeing anyone anytime soon.

2007-01-28T00:02:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 28 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)
	* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)
			** No problem. It takes a while to get used to the formatting conventions and standards. Glad to have you here contributing in any case!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 27 January 2007 (EST)

2007-01-27T23:25:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 27 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't like the "Fan theories" section. It'll be outdated in 2 days, anyway. [[User:Heroe\|Heroe]] 18:17, 27 January 2007 (EST)		I don't like the "Fan theories" section. It'll be outdated in 2 days, anyway. [[User:Heroe\|Heroe]] 18:17, 27 January 2007 (EST)
	* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)
			* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)

2007-01-27T23:24:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:24, 27 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't like the "Fan theories" section. It'll be outdated in 2 days, anyway. [[User:Heroe\|Heroe]] 18:17, 27 January 2007 (EST)		I don't like the "Fan theories" section. It'll be outdated in 2 days, anyway. [[User:Heroe\|Heroe]] 18:17, 27 January 2007 (EST)
			* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)

2007-01-27T23:17:55Z

New page: I don't like the "Fan theories" section. It'll be outdated in 2 days, anyway. ~~~~

New page

I don't like the "Fan theories" section. It'll be outdated in 2 days, anyway. [[User:Heroe|Heroe]] 18:17, 27 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:02, 28 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Well, yeah. But at least now that it's not signed, it's not too wildly non-standard from the other spoilers articles. And it's either that or people will put all of the theories in the big, bloated theories article. Pick your poison, I guess.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:24, 27 January 2007 (EST)
	* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)		* Yeah.. sorry about the first time... I realize now that I shouldn't have posted it as a list... [[User:Anomy\|Anomy]] 18:25, 27 January 2007 (EST)
			** No problem. It takes a while to get used to the formatting conventions and standards. Glad to have you here contributing in any case!--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 19:02, 27 January 2007 (EST)