Talk:Ability replication - Revision history

imported>WarGrowlmon18: /* His Dreams */ new section

2013-11-12T07:08:45Z

His Dreams: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:08, 12 November 2013
(No difference)

imported>WarGrowlmon18: /* His Dreams */ new section

2013-11-12T07:08:45Z

His Dreams: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:08, 12 November 2013
Line 153:		Line 153:
	* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)		* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
	*Yea, cause if he was to copy Intuitive Aptitude, he could then steal someones ability by removing the head etc. He could then permanently keep and power's he stole. AND could then lose Intuitive Aptitude to a different ability that he copies. If you can understand that ;)--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 05:30, 2 October 2010 (EDT)		*Yea, cause if he was to copy Intuitive Aptitude, he could then steal someones ability by removing the head etc. He could then permanently keep and power's he stole. AND could then lose Intuitive Aptitude to a different ability that he copies. If you can understand that ;)--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 05:30, 2 October 2010 (EDT)

			== His Dreams ==

			If you look closely, the second dream is different than the first including the location. This is obviously influenced by Peter's warning to Emma that she finally listens to in Brave New World and the change in dream reflects the changes he caused in time with his warning.--[[User:WarGrowlmon18\|WarGrowlmon18]] 02:08, 12 November 2013 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Copying Powers */ +sig

2010-10-02T13:02:19Z

Copying Powers: +sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:02, 2 October 2010
Line 152:		Line 152:
	Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 19:02, 1 October 2010 (EDT)		Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 19:02, 1 October 2010 (EDT)
	* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)		* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
	*Yea, cause if he was to copy Intuitive Aptitude, he could then steal someones ability by removing the head etc. He could then permanently keep and power's he stole. AND could then lose Intuitive Aptitude to a different ability that he copies. If you can understand that ;)		*Yea, cause if he was to copy Intuitive Aptitude, he could then steal someones ability by removing the head etc. He could then permanently keep and power's he stole. AND could then lose Intuitive Aptitude to a different ability that he copies. If you can understand that ;)--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 05:30, 2 October 2010 (EDT)

imported>Styx at 09:30, 2 October 2010

2010-10-02T09:30:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 2 October 2010
Line 152:		Line 152:
	Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 19:02, 1 October 2010 (EDT)		Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 19:02, 1 October 2010 (EDT)
	* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)		* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)
			*Yea, cause if he was to copy Intuitive Aptitude, he could then steal someones ability by removing the head etc. He could then permanently keep and power's he stole. AND could then lose Intuitive Aptitude to a different ability that he copies. If you can understand that ;)

imported>MiamiVolts: sig, reply

2010-10-02T04:59:02Z

sig, reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:59, 2 October 2010
Line 148:		Line 148:

	== Copying Powers ==		== Copying Powers ==

	What does anyone think would happen if Peter copied his old power? Could he then use it to copy many powers?		What does anyone think would happen if Peter copied his old power? Could he then use it to copy many powers?

	Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?		Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?--[[User:Styx\|Styx]] ([[User talk:Styx\|talk]]) 19:02, 1 October 2010 (EDT)
			* If he copied his old power or Intuitive Aptitude, I think he'd probably use the new power copying technique more often than ability replication. However, they would probably pose a dilemma to him, since he had problems controlling aspects of both of them.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:58, 2 October 2010 (EDT)

imported>Styx: /* Copying Powers */ new section

2010-10-01T23:02:55Z

Copying Powers: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:02, 1 October 2010
Line 146:		Line 146:
	I think this Ability should have a different name, because "Replication" means making copies. I would think this power would have the name "Single Replication" or something like that. Replication doesn't tell the whole story behind the ability enough like Empathic Mimicry would mean Copying through Emotion or using through emotion. Ability Replication wouldn't be much different then Empathic Mimicry for the names.		I think this Ability should have a different name, because "Replication" means making copies. I would think this power would have the name "Single Replication" or something like that. Replication doesn't tell the whole story behind the ability enough like Empathic Mimicry would mean Copying through Emotion or using through emotion. Ability Replication wouldn't be much different then Empathic Mimicry for the names.
	* Replication means to duplicate or to repeat. I don't see anything wrong with the name "ability replication". It's worked for two years now, and I don't see any reason to change it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:14, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		* Replication means to duplicate or to repeat. I don't see anything wrong with the name "ability replication". It's worked for two years now, and I don't see any reason to change it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:14, 8 May 2010 (EDT)

			== Copying Powers ==

			What does anyone think would happen if Peter copied his old power? Could he then use it to copy many powers?

			Or if he copied Intuitive Aptitude and then stole powers from others?

imported>50000JH: /* Intuitive Aptitude? */

2010-05-10T20:04:40Z

Intuitive Aptitude?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 10 May 2010
Line 126:		Line 126:
	*Sylar seems to require his IA to use his other abilities- that's why the hunger is always present when he has access to his powers. However, if Peter did mimic his IA and go on a killing spree, his ability replication would become somewhat redundant anyway. Why bother taking someone's ability temporarily if you can get it permanantely by either killing them or making an emotional connection? If the hunger didn't eat Peter alive like it did in Volume 3, he'd probably opt for the latter. [[User:Swmystery\|Swm]] 06:41, 26 January 2010 (EST)		*Sylar seems to require his IA to use his other abilities- that's why the hunger is always present when he has access to his powers. However, if Peter did mimic his IA and go on a killing spree, his ability replication would become somewhat redundant anyway. Why bother taking someone's ability temporarily if you can get it permanantely by either killing them or making an emotional connection? If the hunger didn't eat Peter alive like it did in Volume 3, he'd probably opt for the latter. [[User:Swmystery\|Swm]] 06:41, 26 January 2010 (EST)
	**The even more speculative, hypothetical scenario would be, he took Intuitive aptitude, used it to acquire (by force or through empathy) an ability or two, and then disposed of IA- would he retain the powers gained through IA or not? Totally speculative, but an interesting thought.--[[User:EvilMaldini\|Evil Maldini]] 11:12, 6 February 2010 (EST)		**The even more speculative, hypothetical scenario would be, he took Intuitive aptitude, used it to acquire (by force or through empathy) an ability or two, and then disposed of IA- would he retain the powers gained through IA or not? Totally speculative, but an interesting thought.--[[User:EvilMaldini\|Evil Maldini]] 11:12, 6 February 2010 (EST)
	If Sylar tells Peter that he can gain abilities empathically, through his Intuitive Aptitude and replicate this, then empathically connect with Sylar(although I don't how they do this.) he could gain empath this could help connect with people easily.--50000JH 16:04, 10 May 2010 (EDT)		If Sylar tells Peter that he can gain abilities empathically, through his Intuitive Aptitude and replicate this, then empathically connect with Sylar(although I don't how they do this.) he could gain empath this could help connect with people easily and gain more than one ability.--50000JH 16:04, 10 May 2010 (EDT)

	== Who likes this power? ==		== Who likes this power? ==

imported>50000JH: /* Intuitive Aptitude? */

2010-05-10T20:04:04Z

Intuitive Aptitude?

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 10 May 2010
Line 126:		Line 126:
	*Sylar seems to require his IA to use his other abilities- that's why the hunger is always present when he has access to his powers. However, if Peter did mimic his IA and go on a killing spree, his ability replication would become somewhat redundant anyway. Why bother taking someone's ability temporarily if you can get it permanantely by either killing them or making an emotional connection? If the hunger didn't eat Peter alive like it did in Volume 3, he'd probably opt for the latter. [[User:Swmystery\|Swm]] 06:41, 26 January 2010 (EST)		*Sylar seems to require his IA to use his other abilities- that's why the hunger is always present when he has access to his powers. However, if Peter did mimic his IA and go on a killing spree, his ability replication would become somewhat redundant anyway. Why bother taking someone's ability temporarily if you can get it permanantely by either killing them or making an emotional connection? If the hunger didn't eat Peter alive like it did in Volume 3, he'd probably opt for the latter. [[User:Swmystery\|Swm]] 06:41, 26 January 2010 (EST)
	**The even more speculative, hypothetical scenario would be, he took Intuitive aptitude, used it to acquire (by force or through empathy) an ability or two, and then disposed of IA- would he retain the powers gained through IA or not? Totally speculative, but an interesting thought.--[[User:EvilMaldini\|Evil Maldini]] 11:12, 6 February 2010 (EST)		**The even more speculative, hypothetical scenario would be, he took Intuitive aptitude, used it to acquire (by force or through empathy) an ability or two, and then disposed of IA- would he retain the powers gained through IA or not? Totally speculative, but an interesting thought.--[[User:EvilMaldini\|Evil Maldini]] 11:12, 6 February 2010 (EST)
			If Sylar tells Peter that he can gain abilities empathically, through his Intuitive Aptitude and replicate this, then empathically connect with Sylar(although I don't how they do this.) he could gain empath this could help connect with people easily.--50000JH 16:04, 10 May 2010 (EDT)

	== Who likes this power? ==		== Who likes this power? ==

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Different Name? */

2010-05-08T23:14:17Z

Different Name?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:14, 8 May 2010
Line 144:		Line 144:

	I think this Ability should have a different name, because "Replication" means making copies. I would think this power would have the name "Single Replication" or something like that. Replication doesn't tell the whole story behind the ability enough like Empathic Mimicry would mean Copying through Emotion or using through emotion. Ability Replication wouldn't be much different then Empathic Mimicry for the names.		I think this Ability should have a different name, because "Replication" means making copies. I would think this power would have the name "Single Replication" or something like that. Replication doesn't tell the whole story behind the ability enough like Empathic Mimicry would mean Copying through Emotion or using through emotion. Ability Replication wouldn't be much different then Empathic Mimicry for the names.
			* Replication means to duplicate or to repeat. I don't see anything wrong with the name "ability replication". It's worked for two years now, and I don't see any reason to change it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:14, 8 May 2010 (EDT)

imported>Alessia: /* Different Name? */ new section

2010-05-08T22:54:44Z

Different Name?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:54, 8 May 2010
Line 140:		Line 140:
	********* I like the ability and how it makes you think which power is more important, but I don't like Peter with it. Peter should have multiple abilities. And I don't like how they gave Sylar Peter's original ability making him "the most special", they obviously think that Sylar can have more than one because his apparently so great, but Peter is dumb. They could of wrote Peter with a "brain" with multiple abilities, as they do with Sylar so they are just lousy writers. --[[User:Powermimic\|Powermimic]] 00:52, 12 February 2010 (EST)		********* I like the ability and how it makes you think which power is more important, but I don't like Peter with it. Peter should have multiple abilities. And I don't like how they gave Sylar Peter's original ability making him "the most special", they obviously think that Sylar can have more than one because his apparently so great, but Peter is dumb. They could of wrote Peter with a "brain" with multiple abilities, as they do with Sylar so they are just lousy writers. --[[User:Powermimic\|Powermimic]] 00:52, 12 February 2010 (EST)
	********** I like it. His new ability makes him the opposite if Sylar, having only one ability at a time and needing people to help him. --[[User:Decimo\|Decimo]] 14:15, 28 February 2010 (EST)		********** I like it. His new ability makes him the opposite if Sylar, having only one ability at a time and needing people to help him. --[[User:Decimo\|Decimo]] 14:15, 28 February 2010 (EST)

			== Different Name? ==

			I think this Ability should have a different name, because "Replication" means making copies. I would think this power would have the name "Single Replication" or something like that. Replication doesn't tell the whole story behind the ability enough like Empathic Mimicry would mean Copying through Emotion or using through emotion. Ability Replication wouldn't be much different then Empathic Mimicry for the names.