Talk:Analyst (disambig) - Revision history

imported>Admin: /* Danko's/Nathan's analyst */ rmv spoiler text

2009-03-19T15:29:09Z

Danko's/Nathan's analyst: rmv spoiler text

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 19 March 2009
(No difference)

imported>Admin: /* Danko's/Nathan's analyst */ rmv spoiler text

2009-03-19T15:29:09Z

Danko's/Nathan's analyst: rmv spoiler text

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 19 March 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)		* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)
	** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)		** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)
	** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. The [[Nathan's analyst]] character, however, is, {{spoilertext\|according to IMDb, going to appear in ''Shades of Gray'' and thus be made a recurring character with 4 appearances.}} So I think it'll be an important article to seriously consider the name. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)		** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)
	*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[Doralicia]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)		*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[Doralicia]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)
	**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)		**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Danko's/Nathan's analyst */

2009-03-09T16:49:07Z

Danko's/Nathan's analyst

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:49, 9 March 2009
Line 8:		Line 8:
	****Yeah, agreed with name change. I do recall [[Danko's analyst]], in the ''[[Building 26]]'' episode, radioing [[Danko's team]] out in the field and calling himself ''Central command''. Would "central commander" or something of the like be okay? After all, the only reason I inferred him as an analyst in the first place was because he was sitting and tapping away at computers like all the other analysts were, and I had missed his "central command" comment. He could actually be a field commander or something like that, and the central command line seems to support that. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:52, 7 March 2009 (EST)		****Yeah, agreed with name change. I do recall [[Danko's analyst]], in the ''[[Building 26]]'' episode, radioing [[Danko's team]] out in the field and calling himself ''Central command''. Would "central commander" or something of the like be okay? After all, the only reason I inferred him as an analyst in the first place was because he was sitting and tapping away at computers like all the other analysts were, and I had missed his "central command" comment. He could actually be a field commander or something like that, and the central command line seems to support that. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:52, 7 March 2009 (EST)
	*****If it's alright with everyone I'll make the changes soon, with [[Danko's analyst]] becoming ''Central commander'' and [[Nathan's analyst]] becoming ''Analyst''. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:19, 8 March 2009 (EDT)		*****If it's alright with everyone I'll make the changes soon, with [[Danko's analyst]] becoming ''Central commander'' and [[Nathan's analyst]] becoming ''Analyst''. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:19, 8 March 2009 (EDT)
			****** Sounds good to me. Just a note, though, that [[James McAndrew]]'s character is still an analyst so he still belongs on this disambig page. But great job picking out that detail, Radicell. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 12:49, 9 March 2009 (EDT)

imported>Radicell at 13:19, 8 March 2009

2009-03-08T13:19:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:19, 8 March 2009
Line 7:		Line 7:
	**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)		**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)
	****Yeah, agreed with name change. I do recall [[Danko's analyst]], in the ''[[Building 26]]'' episode, radioing [[Danko's team]] out in the field and calling himself ''Central command''. Would "central commander" or something of the like be okay? After all, the only reason I inferred him as an analyst in the first place was because he was sitting and tapping away at computers like all the other analysts were, and I had missed his "central command" comment. He could actually be a field commander or something like that, and the central command line seems to support that. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:52, 7 March 2009 (EST)		****Yeah, agreed with name change. I do recall [[Danko's analyst]], in the ''[[Building 26]]'' episode, radioing [[Danko's team]] out in the field and calling himself ''Central command''. Would "central commander" or something of the like be okay? After all, the only reason I inferred him as an analyst in the first place was because he was sitting and tapping away at computers like all the other analysts were, and I had missed his "central command" comment. He could actually be a field commander or something like that, and the central command line seems to support that. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:52, 7 March 2009 (EST)
			*****If it's alright with everyone I'll make the changes soon, with [[Danko's analyst]] becoming ''Central commander'' and [[Nathan's analyst]] becoming ''Analyst''. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:19, 8 March 2009 (EDT)

imported>Radicell at 14:52, 7 March 2009

2009-03-07T14:52:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:52, 7 March 2009
Line 6:		Line 6:
	*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[Doralicia]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)		*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[Doralicia]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)
	**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)		**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)
			****Yeah, agreed with name change. I do recall [[Danko's analyst]], in the ''[[Building 26]]'' episode, radioing [[Danko's team]] out in the field and calling himself ''Central command''. Would "central commander" or something of the like be okay? After all, the only reason I inferred him as an analyst in the first place was because he was sitting and tapping away at computers like all the other analysts were, and I had missed his "central command" comment. He could actually be a field commander or something like that, and the central command line seems to support that. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:52, 7 March 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Danko's/Nathan's analyst */

2009-03-07T14:49:17Z

Danko's/Nathan's analyst

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 7 March 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)		** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)
	** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. The [[Nathan's analyst]] character, however, is, {{spoilertext\|according to IMDb, going to appear in ''Shades of Gray'' and thus be made a recurring character with 4 appearances.}} So I think it'll be an important article to seriously consider the name. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)		** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. The [[Nathan's analyst]] character, however, is, {{spoilertext\|according to IMDb, going to appear in ''Shades of Gray'' and thus be made a recurring character with 4 appearances.}} So I think it'll be an important article to seriously consider the name. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)
	*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[~~Doralica~~]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)		*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[Doralicia]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)
			**** You know, another option would be to name [[Jonny Siew]]'s character "analyst", and then name [[James McAndrew]]'s character "analyst (Building 26)". It wouldn't be the first time--we did that with [[Michael Reilly Burke]]'s character. I don't really have any strong feelings one way or another about what the names end up as, only that we don't use the names as they are now ("Danko's analyst" and "Nathan's analyst") since they are misleading. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:49, 7 March 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Danko's/Nathan's analyst */

2009-03-07T14:44:49Z

Danko's/Nathan's analyst

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 7 March 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)		** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)
	** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. The [[Nathan's analyst]] character, however, is, {{spoilertext\|according to IMDb, going to appear in ''Shades of Gray'' and thus be made a recurring character with 4 appearances.}} So I think it'll be an important article to seriously consider the name. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)		** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. The [[Nathan's analyst]] character, however, is, {{spoilertext\|according to IMDb, going to appear in ''Shades of Gray'' and thus be made a recurring character with 4 appearances.}} So I think it'll be an important article to seriously consider the name. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)
			*** I think naming a person by their race is generally in poor taste. [[Doralica]] was actually credited as "[[Hispanic woman]]", which is why she has that name. I think we might need to go with a parenthetical numbering system for the analysts, unfortunately. However, we might want to wait to see if either of the analysts--or any other analysts--appear again to maybe give us something else with which to name the guys. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:44, 7 March 2009 (EST)

imported>Radicell: slight bump

2009-03-07T01:21:57Z

slight bump

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 7 March 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)		* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)
	** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)		** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)
			** So... have we had more ideas? We ''could'' go by race - as we have done with [[Hispanic woman]] - and name them ''Asian analyst'' and ''Caucasian analyst'', although it does look awkward and out of place. The [[Nathan's analyst]] character, however, is, {{spoilertext\|according to IMDb, going to appear in ''Shades of Gray'' and thus be made a recurring character with 4 appearances.}} So I think it'll be an important article to seriously consider the name. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 20:21, 6 March 2009 (EST)

imported>Radicell at 09:38, 3 March 2009

2009-03-03T09:38:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:38, 3 March 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I think we need to find a better method of naming them. From what I've seen, [[Nathan's analyst]] has answered to not only Nathan, but Danko, and even Noah as well (I can't remember if [[Danko's analyst]] has answered to anyone else though). Any suggestions? {{User:Thrashmeister/Autosig}} 21:19, 2 March 2009 (EST)		I think we need to find a better method of naming them. From what I've seen, [[Nathan's analyst]] has answered to not only Nathan, but Danko, and even Noah as well (I can't remember if [[Danko's analyst]] has answered to anyone else though). Any suggestions? {{User:Thrashmeister/Autosig}} 21:19, 2 March 2009 (EST)
	* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)		* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)
			** Right. When I first renamed the 'Analyst' article (which was the past version of [[Nathan's analyst]], I didn't think that he'd reappear. Evidently, he did, and we're faced with a situation. For the record, [[Danko's analyst]] alerts Danko about Sylar and commands the operation to capture him. [[Nathan's analyst]] alerts Nathan about Tracy's arrival, alerts Danko about Peter's presence at the storage unit, alerts Nathan about Peter holding Danko at gunpoint, and does something in ''[[Episode:Exposed\|Exposed]]'', although since I haven't watched the episode I'm not sure what. There's likely to be more analysts coming, so I think numbers (I)(II)(III) are our best bet. --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 04:38, 3 March 2009 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Danko's/Nathan's analyst */

2009-03-03T02:30:05Z

Danko's/Nathan's analyst

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:30, 3 March 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Danko's/Nathan's analyst==		==Danko's/Nathan's analyst==
	I think we need to find a better method of naming them. From what I've seen, [[Nathan's analyst]] has answered to not only Nathan, but Danko, and even Noah as well (I can't remember if [[Danko's analyst]] has answered to anyone else though). Any suggestions? {{User:Thrashmeister/Autosig}} 21:19, 2 March 2009 (EST)		I think we need to find a better method of naming them. From what I've seen, [[Nathan's analyst]] has answered to not only Nathan, but Danko, and even Noah as well (I can't remember if [[Danko's analyst]] has answered to anyone else though). Any suggestions? {{User:Thrashmeister/Autosig}} 21:19, 2 March 2009 (EST)
			* I agree. It bothered me going to [[Nathan's analyst]] and adding something there about Danko. I don't think they're analysts that "belong to" or work for any one person in particular. They all work on the initiative of locating evolved humans. Sure, Nathan is the political head of that operation, and Danko runs the missions, but I wouldn't say that the analysts are "Nathan's analyst" or "Danko's analyst". My only suggestion is not the best one: "Analyst (I)" and "Analyst (II)". Perhaps we can name them by something they've said or done? I don't remember them well enough to suggest another name, though. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:30, 2 March 2009 (EST)