Talk:Au Co's village - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: remove red link to GNPlace

2007-05-22T01:04:50Z

remove red link to GNPlace

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:04, 22 May 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: remove red link to GNPlace

2007-05-22T01:04:50Z

remove red link to GNPlace

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 22 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	*****When a page is moved, it automatically creates a redirect. In other words, [[Au Co, Vietnam]] would automatically redirect to "Au Co's village" or whatever we call it. The most we would have to do is fix any double redirects (of which there would be none since nothing redirects to this page) and change a few links here and there (like on [[Portal:GN Miscellaneous Places]], on [[Template:GNPlace]], and probably a few content-related articles). Part of me says to hold off until we find out the name, but part of me says to do it now before the links become too abundant. Something to consider: [[Jason Badower]] says that he drew a location that we're going to be seeing in the next few episodes. Cool. I assume that means this village is going to be filmed. I'd rather have links that say a nonspecific name like "Au Co's village" (which is not exact but not wrong) than "Au Co, Vietnam" (which very well may be wrong). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		*****When a page is moved, it automatically creates a redirect. In other words, [[Au Co, Vietnam]] would automatically redirect to "Au Co's village" or whatever we call it. The most we would have to do is fix any double redirects (of which there would be none since nothing redirects to this page) and change a few links here and there (like on [[Portal:GN Miscellaneous Places]], on Template:GNPlace, and probably a few content-related articles). Part of me says to hold off until we find out the name, but part of me says to do it now before the links become too abundant. Something to consider: [[Jason Badower]] says that he drew a location that we're going to be seeing in the next few episodes. Cool. I assume that means this village is going to be filmed. I'd rather have links that say a nonspecific name like "Au Co's village" (which is not exact but not wrong) than "Au Co, Vietnam" (which very well may be wrong). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Admin: Talk:Au Co, Vietnam moved to Talk:Au Co's village: Au Co was determined to be a person, not a place.

2007-04-11T14:03:19Z

Talk:Au Co, Vietnam moved to Talk:Au Co's village: Au Co was determined to be a person, not a place.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 11 April 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 00:58, 4 April 2007

2007-04-04T00:58:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 4 April 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			*****When a page is moved, it automatically creates a redirect. In other words, [[Au Co, Vietnam]] would automatically redirect to "Au Co's village" or whatever we call it. The most we would have to do is fix any double redirects (of which there would be none since nothing redirects to this page) and change a few links here and there (like on [[Portal:GN Miscellaneous Places]], on [[Template:GNPlace]], and probably a few content-related articles). Part of me says to hold off until we find out the name, but part of me says to do it now before the links become too abundant. Something to consider: [[Jason Badower]] says that he drew a location that we're going to be seeing in the next few episodes. Cool. I assume that means this village is going to be filmed. I'd rather have links that say a nonspecific name like "Au Co's village" (which is not exact but not wrong) than "Au Co, Vietnam" (which very well may be wrong). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo at 00:50, 4 April 2007

2007-04-04T00:50:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 4 April 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 18:34, 3 April 2007

2007-04-03T18:34:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 3 April 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>E rowe at 13:08, 3 April 2007

2007-04-03T13:08:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 3 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	there really should be a disambig page for Au Co, which is both the girl and the village, as far as we know. [[User:Rwun\|Rwun]] 06:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		there really should be a disambig page for Au Co, which is both the girl and the village, as far as we know. [[User:Rwun\|Rwun]] 06:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 10:44, 3 April 2007

2007-04-03T10:44:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 3 April 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	there really should be a disambig page for Au Co, which is both the girl and the village, as far as we know. [[User:Rwun\|Rwun]] 06:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		there really should be a disambig page for Au Co, which is both the girl and the village, as far as we know. [[User:Rwun\|Rwun]] 06:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Rwun: need disambig

2007-04-03T10:42:13Z

need disambig

New page

there really should be a disambig page for Au Co, which is both the girl and the village, as far as we know. [[User:Rwun|Rwun]] 06:42, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 22 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	*****When a page is moved, it automatically creates a redirect. In other words, [[Au Co, Vietnam]] would automatically redirect to "Au Co's village" or whatever we call it. The most we would have to do is fix any double redirects (of which there would be none since nothing redirects to this page) and change a few links here and there (like on [[Portal:GN Miscellaneous Places]], on [[Template:GNPlace]], and probably a few content-related articles). Part of me says to hold off until we find out the name, but part of me says to do it now before the links become too abundant. Something to consider: [[Jason Badower]] says that he drew a location that we're going to be seeing in the next few episodes. Cool. I assume that means this village is going to be filmed. I'd rather have links that say a nonspecific name like "Au Co's village" (which is not exact but not wrong) than "Au Co, Vietnam" (which very well may be wrong). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		*****When a page is moved, it automatically creates a redirect. In other words, [[Au Co, Vietnam]] would automatically redirect to "Au Co's village" or whatever we call it. The most we would have to do is fix any double redirects (of which there would be none since nothing redirects to this page) and change a few links here and there (like on [[Portal:GN Miscellaneous Places]], on Template:GNPlace, and probably a few content-related articles). Part of me says to hold off until we find out the name, but part of me says to do it now before the links become too abundant. Something to consider: [[Jason Badower]] says that he drew a location that we're going to be seeing in the next few episodes. Cool. I assume that means this village is going to be filmed. I'd rather have links that say a nonspecific name like "Au Co's village" (which is not exact but not wrong) than "Au Co, Vietnam" (which very well may be wrong). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:58, 4 April 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			*****When a page is moved, it automatically creates a redirect. In other words, [[Au Co, Vietnam]] would automatically redirect to "Au Co's village" or whatever we call it. The most we would have to do is fix any double redirects (of which there would be none since nothing redirects to this page) and change a few links here and there (like on [[Portal:GN Miscellaneous Places]], on [[Template:GNPlace]], and probably a few content-related articles). Part of me says to hold off until we find out the name, but part of me says to do it now before the links become too abundant. Something to consider: [[Jason Badower]] says that he drew a location that we're going to be seeing in the next few episodes. Cool. I assume that means this village is going to be filmed. I'd rather have links that say a nonspecific name like "Au Co's village" (which is not exact but not wrong) than "Au Co, Vietnam" (which very well may be wrong). — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 20:58, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:50, 4 April 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			****If we do this (and perhaps they're reveal the true name of the village in the future), we need to ensure that it's referred to as Au Co in WB Part 2 & 3, at the least in quotes. But I agree, it's not the name of the village (that we know of). --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 20:50, 3 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 3 April 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		* [[Au Co]] should be the girl, with a See Also section directing to [[Au Co (disambig)]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 06:44, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		** I agree. It's not that they have the same name. It's that the soldiers mistakenly took Au Co to mean the village, which it didn't. The village article's name should be changed, and somewhere in the article it should explain that it is called Au Co by the mistaken soldiers.--[[User:E rowe\|E rowe]] 09:08, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			***We really need to change the article's name. It's not Au Co, that's a mistaken name. How about "Au Co's village"? There's also the less descriptive "Vietnamese village". — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:34, 3 April 2007 (EDT)