Talk:Aura absorption - Revision history

imported>Intuitive Empath at 01:18, 23 February 2010

2010-02-23T01:18:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 23 February 2010
(No difference)

2010-02-23T01:18:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:18, 23 February 2010
Line 117:		Line 117:

	Power absorption and Empathic mimicry are said to variant of the same ability. What do you all think about aura absorption, power absorption and ability replication? Is there a link between these three abilities? And yes I am aware that empathic mimicry is a completely different ability from ability replication. --[[User:Blood69]] 12:17, 23 February 2010 (AEST)		Power absorption and Empathic mimicry are said to variant of the same ability. What do you all think about aura absorption, power absorption and ability replication? Is there a link between these three abilities? And yes I am aware that empathic mimicry is a completely different ability from ability replication. --[[User:Blood69]] 12:17, 23 February 2010 (AEST)
			*I don't think aura absorption is related to them. Those are about powers, with aura absorption, powers are a secondary thing, it's something that can happen, it's not the point of the ability. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 20:18, 22 February 2010 (EST)

2010-02-23T01:17:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:17, 23 February 2010
Line 113:		Line 113:
	***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)		***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
	***Congratulations, Ryan! --[[User:Isaac Mendez\|Isaac Mendez]] 13:06, 21 January 2010 (EST)		***Congratulations, Ryan! --[[User:Isaac Mendez\|Isaac Mendez]] 13:06, 21 January 2010 (EST)

			== LInk to power absorption ==

			Power absorption and Empathic mimicry are said to variant of the same ability. What do you all think about aura absorption, power absorption and ability replication? Is there a link between these three abilities? And yes I am aware that empathic mimicry is a completely different ability from ability replication. --[[User:Blood69]] 12:17, 23 February 2010 (AEST)

2010-01-21T18:08:03Z

got rid of some space

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:08, 21 January 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{power names\|2\|eos=[[Linda Tavara]] refers to the bands of energy she sees as auras}}		{{power names\|2\|eos=[[Linda Tavara]] refers to the bands of energy she sees as auras}}

	==The name==		==The name==
	Well, we may as well get right into it. Suggestions? --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 05:33, 19 February 2008 (EST)		Well, we may as well get right into it. Suggestions? --[[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]] 05:33, 19 February 2008 (EST)

2010-01-21T18:06:58Z

Consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 21 January 2010
Line 113:		Line 113:
	**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
	***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)		***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
			***Congratulations, Ryan! --[[User:Isaac Mendez\|Isaac Mendez]] 13:06, 21 January 2010 (EST)

2008-04-11T23:29:20Z

adding explanation of name choice

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:29, 11 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{power names\|2\|eos=[[Linda Tavara]] refers to the bands of energy she sees as auras}}
	{{power names\|2}}

	==The name==		==The name==

2008-04-11T23:19:19Z

Consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 11 April 2008
Line 112:		Line 112:
	*** Or "your sarcasm is slightly obvious". :P --[[User:NellaBishop\|NellaBishop]] 17:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		*** Or "your sarcasm is slightly obvious". :P --[[User:NellaBishop\|NellaBishop]] 17:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
	**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
			***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)

2008-04-11T08:35:41Z

Update.

2008-04-11T00:16:40Z

Talk:Linda's ability moved to Talk:Aura absorption: Looks like this is the general consensus.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 11 April 2008
(No difference)

2008-04-10T23:45:50Z

Consensus

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:45, 10 April 2008
Line 103:		Line 103:
	#-- [[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]]		#-- [[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]]
	#-- [[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]]		#-- [[User:Piemanmoo\|Piemanmoo]]
			#--[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

	<u>'''Aura manipulation'''</u>		<u>'''Aura manipulation'''</u>
Line 110:		Line 111:
	** "A bit unanimous" ... That's sort of a contradiction in terms, eh? :) That's like saying, "My wife is a little pregnant." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:01, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		** "A bit unanimous" ... That's sort of a contradiction in terms, eh? :) That's like saying, "My wife is a little pregnant." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:01, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
	*** Or "your sarcasm is slightly obvious". :P --[[User:NellaBishop\|NellaBishop]] 17:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		*** Or "your sarcasm is slightly obvious". :P --[[User:NellaBishop\|NellaBishop]] 17:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
			**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 21 January 2010
Line 113:		Line 113:
	**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
	***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)		***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)
			***Congratulations, Ryan! --[[User:Isaac Mendez\|Isaac Mendez]] 13:06, 21 January 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 11 April 2008
Line 112:		Line 112:
	*** Or "your sarcasm is slightly obvious". :P --[[User:NellaBishop\|NellaBishop]] 17:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		*** Or "your sarcasm is slightly obvious". :P --[[User:NellaBishop\|NellaBishop]] 17:24, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
	**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)		**** Or "this is kind of a sentence". --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:45, 10 April 2008 (EDT)
			***** Since you began it with a conjunction, that ''is'' only kind of a sentence.--[[User:Paronine\|Paronine]] 19:19, 11 April 2008 (EDT)