Talk:Blood recipients - Revision history

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ SIGN!!!!!!

2008-09-01T05:50:55Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: SIGN!!!!!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:50, 1 September 2008
(No difference)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ SIGN!!!!!!

2008-09-01T05:50:55Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: SIGN!!!!!!

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:50, 1 September 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Are you talking about the infobox? Imho, first mentioned should probably be the concept, like you said, but it's not defined what "first mentioned" means in the infobox. I was trying to make that point.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		*** Are you talking about the infobox? Imho, first mentioned should probably be the concept, like you said, but it's not defined what "first mentioned" means in the infobox. I was trying to make that point.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
	**** I was talking about the infobox, yes. If no one objects, I'll change the first mention to "The Hard Part" tomorrow		**** I was talking about the infobox, yes. If no one objects, I'll change the first mention to "The Hard Part" tomorrow.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:50, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ reply

2008-09-01T05:50:34Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:50, 1 September 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Are you talking about the infobox? Imho, first mentioned should probably be the concept, like you said, but it's not defined what "first mentioned" means in the infobox. I was trying to make that point.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		*** Are you talking about the infobox? Imho, first mentioned should probably be the concept, like you said, but it's not defined what "first mentioned" means in the infobox. I was trying to make that point.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
			**** I was talking about the infobox, yes. If no one objects, I'll change the first mention to "The Hard Part" tomorrow

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ reply

2008-09-01T05:20:19Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 1 September 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	** I'm not talking historically, I'm talking about the first episode where the concept was mentioned in earnest. Should it be "The Hard Part," where this concept was first introduced to us scientifically; or should it be "Genesis," the first time that we see something ingesting another's blood?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		** I'm not talking historically, I'm talking about the first episode where the concept was mentioned in earnest. Should it be "The Hard Part," where this concept was first introduced to us scientifically; or should it be "Genesis," the first time that we see something ingesting another's blood?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
			*** Are you talking about the infobox? Imho, first mentioned should probably be the concept, like you said, but it's not defined what "first mentioned" means in the infobox. I was trying to make that point.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:20, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */

2008-09-01T05:07:02Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 1 September 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* I'm not sure if we want first historically, or first in-show, but Adam's giving one of his wives some of his blood should be the first mention historically.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:49, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		* I'm not sure if we want first historically, or first in-show, but Adam's giving one of his wives some of his blood should be the first mention historically.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:49, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
	** I'm not talking historically, I'm talking about the first episode where the concept was mentioned in earnest. Should it be "The Hard Part," where this concept was first introduced to us scientifically; or should it be "Genesis," the first time that we see something ingesting another's blood?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		** I'm not talking historically, I'm talking about the first episode where the concept was mentioned in earnest. Should it be "The Hard Part," where this concept was first introduced to us scientifically; or should it be "Genesis," the first time that we see something ingesting another's blood?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
			*** Doesn't matter to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:07, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ reply

2008-09-01T05:04:23Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 1 September 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:
	I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:06, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:06, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
	* I'm not sure if we want first historically, or first in-show, but Adam's giving one of his wives some of his blood should be the first mention historically.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:49, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		* I'm not sure if we want first historically, or first in-show, but Adam's giving one of his wives some of his blood should be the first mention historically.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:49, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
			** I'm not talking historically, I'm talking about the first episode where the concept was mentioned in earnest. Should it be "The Hard Part," where this concept was first introduced to us scientifically; or should it be "Genesis," the first time that we see something ingesting another's blood?--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:04, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ reply

2008-09-01T04:49:53Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:49, 1 September 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:

	I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:06, 1 September 2008 (EDT)		I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:06, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
			* I'm not sure if we want first historically, or first in-show, but Adam's giving one of his wives some of his blood should be the first mention historically.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 00:49, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ sign

2008-09-01T04:06:22Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: sign

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 1 September 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:
	== Is [[Genesis]] REALLY the first example? ==		== Is [[Genesis]] REALLY the first example? ==

	I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."		I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 00:06, 1 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Is Genesis REALLY the first example? */ new section

2008-09-01T04:06:00Z

Is Genesis REALLY the first example?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 1 September 2008
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST)		Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST)
	* I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)		* I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)

			== Is [[Genesis]] REALLY the first example? ==

			I mean, the concept wasn't established scientifically until {{epp\|121}}. I fail to see where Muggles's ingestion of Claire's blood in Genesis should be the episode where the concept first appeared. I'm thinking The Hard Part is where we should cite the "first mention."

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Separate "super blood" */

2008-01-10T02:12:07Z

Separate "super blood"

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:12, 10 January 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	==Separate "super blood"==		==Separate "super blood"==
	Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST)		Do you think we you split off the blend of Mohinder and Claire's blood? My reason for this is because it both heals and cures the virus, which falls under both of the sections currently listed.--{{User:Baldbobbo/sig}} 16:45, 9 January 2008 (EST)
			* I don't have too strong an opinion on it, but since it's pretty much just the two bloods mixed, I don't see any problem with it mentioned in both sections. I mean, it's not like it's a brand new type of blood or some kind of new power. It's just the two aspects mixed into one. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)