Talk:Brianundaunted - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: lowercase

2008-11-09T23:48:11Z

lowercase

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:48, 9 November 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: lowercase

2008-11-09T23:48:11Z

lowercase

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:48, 9 November 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{lowercase}}
	==Password 2==		==Password 2==
	Isn't is the password ''Lac Long Quan''? Good job Hardvice for this page, I like how it turned out.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 22:55, 11 April 2007 (EDT)		Isn't is the password ''Lac Long Quan''? Good job Hardvice for this page, I like how it turned out.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 22:55, 11 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Therequiembellishere: /* Section move */

2007-12-27T18:58:48Z

Section move

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:58, 27 December 2007
Line 66:		Line 66:
	I think that since it is a conglomeration of websites and not a singular site, we should move this under the "Other" section instead of the "Websites" section. [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 06:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)		I think that since it is a conglomeration of websites and not a singular site, we should move this under the "Other" section instead of the "Websites" section. [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 06:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)
	*I'm not opposed to that. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 10:23, 27 December 2007 (EST)		*I'm not opposed to that. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 10:23, 27 December 2007 (EST)
			:*Well, I don't know how to do it. Lol. [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 13:58, 27 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Section move */

2007-12-27T15:23:03Z

Section move

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 27 December 2007
Line 65:		Line 65:
	==Section move==		==Section move==
	I think that since it is a conglomeration of websites and not a singular site, we should move this under the "Other" section instead of the "Websites" section. [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 06:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)		I think that since it is a conglomeration of websites and not a singular site, we should move this under the "Other" section instead of the "Websites" section. [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 06:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)
			*I'm not opposed to that. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 10:23, 27 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Therequiembellishere: /* Just plain Brian */

2007-12-27T11:08:29Z

Just plain Brian

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 27 December 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)		Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
	* I think we might see him in [[.07%]]. We probably ought to wait and see. This page is fine for now, as it details most of his involvement in [[Heroes 360]] and the rest is covered on [[Hana's website]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)		* I think we might see him in [[.07%]]. We probably ought to wait and see. This page is fine for now, as it details most of his involvement in [[Heroes 360]] and the rest is covered on [[Hana's website]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

			==Section move==
			I think that since it is a conglomeration of websites and not a singular site, we should move this under the "Other" section instead of the "Websites" section. [[User:Therequiembellishere\|Therequiembellishere]] 06:08, 27 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: tpynig si hrad

2007-04-17T03:47:39Z

tpynig si hrad

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 17 April 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)		Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
	* I think we might see him in [[.07%]]. We probably ought to wait and see. This page is fine for now, as it details most of his involvement in [[Heroes 360]] and the rest is covered on [[Hana's ~~wesbite~~]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)		* I think we might see him in [[.07%]]. We probably ought to wait and see. This page is fine for now, as it details most of his involvement in [[Heroes 360]] and the rest is covered on [[Hana's website]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice: /* Just plain Brian */

2007-04-17T03:47:08Z

Just plain Brian

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:47, 17 April 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:

	Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)		Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
			* I think we might see him in [[.07%]]. We probably ought to wait and see. This page is fine for now, as it details most of his involvement in [[Heroes 360]] and the rest is covered on [[Hana's wesbite]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 23:47, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Heroe: Just plain Brian

2007-04-17T03:42:59Z

Just plain Brian

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:42, 17 April 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	**I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		**I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	***Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way, even though you have an extra step if you do it the way I though was correct. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		***Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way, even though you have an extra step if you do it the way I though was correct. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

			== Just plain Brian ==

			Should we have an article for <STRIKE>Brain</STRIKE> <STRIKE>Bran</STRIKE> Brian now that he's been in that video? [[User:Heroe\|<span style="color:green">Heroe!</span>]]<small>[[User talk:Heroe\|<span style="color:#000000">(talk)</span>]]</small> 23:42, 16 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>FrenchFlo: /* Good move */ bulletting

2007-04-12T13:04:28Z

Good move: bulletting

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:04, 12 April 2007
Line 54:		Line 54:
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}
	***No, that's not how this one works. See my post above. (...but for this one it appears you work left to right and each time you come to a digit you've not seen before you count all instances of it in the entire string, not just adjacent ones.) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:50, 12 April 2007 (EDT))		*No, that's not how this one works. See my post above. (...but for this one it appears you work left to right and each time you come to a digit you've not seen before you count all instances of it in the entire string, not just adjacent ones.) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:50, 12 April 2007 (EDT))
	****I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		**I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	*****Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way, even though you have an extra step if you do it the way I though was correct. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		***Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way, even though you have an extra step if you do it the way I though was correct. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Good move */

2007-04-12T10:41:43Z

Good move

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 12 April 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:
	***No, that's not how this one works. See my post above. (...but for this one it appears you work left to right and each time you come to a digit you've not seen before you count all instances of it in the entire string, not just adjacent ones.) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:50, 12 April 2007 (EDT))		***No, that's not how this one works. See my post above. (...but for this one it appears you work left to right and each time you come to a digit you've not seen before you count all instances of it in the entire string, not just adjacent ones.) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:50, 12 April 2007 (EDT))
	****I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		****I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	*****Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*****Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way, even though you have an extra step if you do it the way I though was correct. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:41, 12 April 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:
	***No, that's not how this one works. See my post above. (...but for this one it appears you work left to right and each time you come to a digit you've not seen before you count all instances of it in the entire string, not just adjacent ones.) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:50, 12 April 2007 (EDT))		***No, that's not how this one works. See my post above. (...but for this one it appears you work left to right and each time you come to a digit you've not seen before you count all instances of it in the entire string, not just adjacent ones.) ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 00:50, 12 April 2007 (EDT))
	****I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		****I see what you did there.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 00:52, 12 April 2007 (EDT)
	*****Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)		*****Ah, that makes sense. I thought you were supposed to count all the adjacent numbers in the string, but if you come to a digit you've already counted, then you skip it. Weird, because it works either way, even though you have an extra step if you do it the way I though was correct. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 06:41, 12 April 2007 (EDT)