Talk:Caitlin - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Death? */

2009-11-26T01:14:55Z

Death?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 26 November 2009
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Death? */

2009-11-26T01:14:55Z

Death?

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 26 November 2009
Line 37:		Line 37:

	Even if we're in 2008, we're now later in the year than the "outbreak future" Caitlin got trapped in. It would seem she has been literally blinked out of existence, as she is now in a past that didn't happen. Thoughts on having her date of death listed as something like "Unstuck in time"? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:00, 25 November 2009 (EST)		Even if we're in 2008, we're now later in the year than the "outbreak future" Caitlin got trapped in. It would seem she has been literally blinked out of existence, as she is now in a past that didn't happen. Thoughts on having her date of death listed as something like "Unstuck in time"? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:00, 25 November 2009 (EST)
			* We don't know the nature of her status, or if it's possible to bring her back. It certainly sounds logical...but I can also see the case being made for the writers being able to bring her back. Since the question of what happens to people "stuck" in alternate futures has never been explored, we ultimately don't know whether Caitlin is dead or alive. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:14, 25 November 2009 (EST)

imported>Ricard Desi: /* Death? */ new section

2009-11-25T23:00:35Z

Death?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 25 November 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:

	*Well the way I see it, there are two possibilities of Caitlin's fate. One: She died from the virus, or Two: Because of the changed future, she no longer exists. And Peter's a jerk for forgetting about her. Oh well to late now.--{{User:Catalyst/sig1}} 20:04, 5 May 2009 (EDT)		*Well the way I see it, there are two possibilities of Caitlin's fate. One: She died from the virus, or Two: Because of the changed future, she no longer exists. And Peter's a jerk for forgetting about her. Oh well to late now.--{{User:Catalyst/sig1}} 20:04, 5 May 2009 (EDT)

			== Death? ==

			Even if we're in 2008, we're now later in the year than the "outbreak future" Caitlin got trapped in. It would seem she has been literally blinked out of existence, as she is now in a past that didn't happen. Thoughts on having her date of death listed as something like "Unstuck in time"? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 18:00, 25 November 2009 (EST)

imported>Catalyst: /* What's the deal? */

2009-05-06T00:04:37Z

What's the deal?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 6 May 2009
Line 31:		Line 31:
	:I know. I wasn't that big of a fan of Caitlin, but they just left her storyline so open-ended that it just bothers me. :/ <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 10:44, 25 October 2008 (EDT)		:I know. I wasn't that big of a fan of Caitlin, but they just left her storyline so open-ended that it just bothers me. :/ <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 10:44, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
	***The writers said about Caitlin and the virus storyline in a CBR interview: "The virus story was really the casualty of the strike. We retooled the last couple of minutes of the finale to Volume Two when we knew that the Strike was eminent. We changed the ending so that that virus never broke out. The second volume of Season Two was going to be an outbreak story that would have lasted eight episodes and it was all avoided by Peter Pertelli catching this vile of virus. So it did not break and therefore did not get out in to the community. So three episodes into that volume, we would have found out what happened to Caitlin. As we go forward, after the Writers Strike now, that has sort of become a lost part of the mythology of the show that may never return." --[[user:BloodyFox\|BloodyFox]] 09:45, 29 October 2008 (CEST)		***The writers said about Caitlin and the virus storyline in a CBR interview: "The virus story was really the casualty of the strike. We retooled the last couple of minutes of the finale to Volume Two when we knew that the Strike was eminent. We changed the ending so that that virus never broke out. The second volume of Season Two was going to be an outbreak story that would have lasted eight episodes and it was all avoided by Peter Pertelli catching this vile of virus. So it did not break and therefore did not get out in to the community. So three episodes into that volume, we would have found out what happened to Caitlin. As we go forward, after the Writers Strike now, that has sort of become a lost part of the mythology of the show that may never return." --[[user:BloodyFox\|BloodyFox]] 09:45, 29 October 2008 (CEST)

			*Well the way I see it, there are two possibilities of Caitlin's fate. One: She died from the virus, or Two: Because of the changed future, she no longer exists. And Peter's a jerk for forgetting about her. Oh well to late now.--{{User:Catalyst/sig1}} 20:04, 5 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>BloodyFox: /* What's the deal? */

2008-10-29T08:45:28Z

What's the deal?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 29 October 2008
Line 30:		Line 30:
	I agree, it really seems the writers dropped the ball with this one. Peter seems to have completely forgotten about her, even despite his recent trip to the future. Maybe we should change her page to say that she's the not so significant other of Peter. The sloppiness really irks me, arent people, you know, getting PAID to keep track of this stuff? '''		I agree, it really seems the writers dropped the ball with this one. Peter seems to have completely forgotten about her, even despite his recent trip to the future. Maybe we should change her page to say that she's the not so significant other of Peter. The sloppiness really irks me, arent people, you know, getting PAID to keep track of this stuff? '''
	:I know. I wasn't that big of a fan of Caitlin, but they just left her storyline so open-ended that it just bothers me. :/ <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 10:44, 25 October 2008 (EDT)		:I know. I wasn't that big of a fan of Caitlin, but they just left her storyline so open-ended that it just bothers me. :/ <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 10:44, 25 October 2008 (EDT)
			***The writers said about Caitlin and the virus storyline in a CBR interview: "The virus story was really the casualty of the strike. We retooled the last couple of minutes of the finale to Volume Two when we knew that the Strike was eminent. We changed the ending so that that virus never broke out. The second volume of Season Two was going to be an outbreak story that would have lasted eight episodes and it was all avoided by Peter Pertelli catching this vile of virus. So it did not break and therefore did not get out in to the community. So three episodes into that volume, we would have found out what happened to Caitlin. As we go forward, after the Writers Strike now, that has sort of become a lost part of the mythology of the show that may never return." --[[user:BloodyFox\|BloodyFox]] 09:45, 29 October 2008 (CEST)

imported>Thrashmeister: /* What's the deal? */

2008-10-25T14:44:12Z

What's the deal?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:44, 25 October 2008
Line 29:		Line 29:

	I agree, it really seems the writers dropped the ball with this one. Peter seems to have completely forgotten about her, even despite his recent trip to the future. Maybe we should change her page to say that she's the not so significant other of Peter. The sloppiness really irks me, arent people, you know, getting PAID to keep track of this stuff? '''		I agree, it really seems the writers dropped the ball with this one. Peter seems to have completely forgotten about her, even despite his recent trip to the future. Maybe we should change her page to say that she's the not so significant other of Peter. The sloppiness really irks me, arent people, you know, getting PAID to keep track of this stuff? '''
			:I know. I wasn't that big of a fan of Caitlin, but they just left her storyline so open-ended that it just bothers me. :/ <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 10:44, 25 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>Nowayjose: /* What's the deal? */

2008-10-07T05:02:46Z

What's the deal?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 7 October 2008
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Did the writers just completely forget about Caitlin? Is there any, like, material at all that suggests that she'll return in some way? (interviews etc.) <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:05, 23 September 2008 (EDT)		Did the writers just completely forget about Caitlin? Is there any, like, material at all that suggests that she'll return in some way? (interviews etc.) <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:05, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

			I agree, it really seems the writers dropped the ball with this one. Peter seems to have completely forgotten about her, even despite his recent trip to the future. Maybe we should change her page to say that she's the not so significant other of Peter. The sloppiness really irks me, arent people, you know, getting PAID to keep track of this stuff? '''

imported>Thrashmeister: /* What's the deal? */ new section

2008-09-24T01:05:31Z

What's the deal?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 24 September 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*I have never seen that last name and have no idea where it comes from. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:27, 17 November 2007 (EST)		*I have never seen that last name and have no idea where it comes from. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:27, 17 November 2007 (EST)
	**Looking at Wikipedia's history, Caitlin's supposed last name was added on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166642789&oldid=166629240 October 23] without explanation. (Ricky's name was amended to match about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166678630&oldid=166656653 three hours later].) On [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=166994374 October 25], it was marked as needing a citation, but that notice was removed on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=167750276 October 28], again, without explanation. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 17 November 2007 (EST)		**Looking at Wikipedia's history, Caitlin's supposed last name was added on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166642789&oldid=166629240 October 23] without explanation. (Ricky's name was amended to match about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166678630&oldid=166656653 three hours later].) On [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=166994374 October 25], it was marked as needing a citation, but that notice was removed on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=167750276 October 28], again, without explanation. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 17 November 2007 (EST)

			== What's the deal? ==

			Did the writers just completely forget about Caitlin? Is there any, like, material at all that suggests that she'll return in some way? (interviews etc.) <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:05, 23 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Caitlin's full name */

2007-11-17T23:31:36Z

Caitlin's full name

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 17 November 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I've noticed that a few people on the [http://boards.nbc.com/nbc/index.php?showforum=70 NBC message boards] that a few posters have said that Caitlin's last name is "McKenna". Wikipedia also [[wikipedia:List_of_characters_in_Heroes#Caitlin_McKenna\|claims]] that her full name is "Caitlin McKenna". Is there any truth to this?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:58, 17 November 2007 (EST)		I've noticed that a few people on the [http://boards.nbc.com/nbc/index.php?showforum=70 NBC message boards] that a few posters have said that Caitlin's last name is "McKenna". Wikipedia also [[wikipedia:List_of_characters_in_Heroes#Caitlin_McKenna\|claims]] that her full name is "Caitlin McKenna". Is there any truth to this?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:58, 17 November 2007 (EST)
	*I have never seen that last name and have no idea where it comes from. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:27, 17 November 2007 (EST)		*I have never seen that last name and have no idea where it comes from. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:27, 17 November 2007 (EST)
	**Looking at Wikipedia's history, Caitlin's supposed last name was added on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166642789&oldid=166629240 October 23 without explanation. (Ricky's name was amended to match about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166678630&oldid=166656653 three hours later].) On [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=166994374 October 25], it was marked as needing a citation, but that notice was removed on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=167750276 October 28], again, without explanation. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 17 November 2007 (EST)		**Looking at Wikipedia's history, Caitlin's supposed last name was added on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166642789&oldid=166629240 October 23] without explanation. (Ricky's name was amended to match about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166678630&oldid=166656653 three hours later].) On [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=166994374 October 25], it was marked as needing a citation, but that notice was removed on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=167750276 October 28], again, without explanation. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 17 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Caitlin's full name */

2007-11-17T23:31:10Z

Caitlin's full name

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:31, 17 November 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	I've noticed that a few people on the [http://boards.nbc.com/nbc/index.php?showforum=70 NBC message boards] that a few posters have said that Caitlin's last name is "McKenna". Wikipedia also [[wikipedia:List_of_characters_in_Heroes#Caitlin_McKenna\|claims]] that her full name is "Caitlin McKenna". Is there any truth to this?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:58, 17 November 2007 (EST)		I've noticed that a few people on the [http://boards.nbc.com/nbc/index.php?showforum=70 NBC message boards] that a few posters have said that Caitlin's last name is "McKenna". Wikipedia also [[wikipedia:List_of_characters_in_Heroes#Caitlin_McKenna\|claims]] that her full name is "Caitlin McKenna". Is there any truth to this?--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 15:58, 17 November 2007 (EST)
	*I have never seen that last name and have no idea where it comes from. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:27, 17 November 2007 (EST)		*I have never seen that last name and have no idea where it comes from. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:27, 17 November 2007 (EST)
			**Looking at Wikipedia's history, Caitlin's supposed last name was added on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166642789&oldid=166629240 October 23 without explanation. (Ricky's name was amended to match about [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=166678630&oldid=166656653 three hours later].) On [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=166994374 October 25], it was marked as needing a citation, but that notice was removed on [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_characters_in_Heroes&diff=next&oldid=167750276 October 28], again, without explanation. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 17 November 2007 (EST)