Talk:Charlie Andrews - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* New Picture */

2010-08-21T02:06:38Z

New Picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 21 August 2010
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* New Picture */

2010-08-21T02:06:38Z

New Picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:06, 21 August 2010
Line 101:		Line 101:
	* I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)		* I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
	**No, because we would still have the young present-day Peter. But the young Charlie is gone, and now we have the old present-day Charlie. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 02:59, 13 August 2010 (EDT)		**No, because we would still have the young present-day Peter. But the young Charlie is gone, and now we have the old present-day Charlie. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 02:59, 13 August 2010 (EDT)
	* For the same reason this page is named "Charlie" and not "Charlene", we should use a picture of ~~Jayme~~ Mays to represent the character. That is how she is most widely and commonly known. A picture of Charlie in her advanced age can be included on the page (which it is), but should not be the lead image. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:03, 20 August 2010 (EDT)		* For the same reason this page is named "Charlie" and not "Charlene", we should use a picture of Jayma Mays to represent the character. That is how she is most widely and commonly known. A picture of Charlie in her advanced age can be included on the page (which it is), but should not be the lead image. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:03, 20 August 2010 (EDT)

	== Saving Charlie ==		== Saving Charlie ==

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* New Picture */

2010-08-21T02:03:58Z

New Picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:03, 21 August 2010
Line 99:		Line 99:

	I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)		I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
	*I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)		* I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
	**No, because we would still have the young present-day Peter. But the young Charlie is gone, and now we have the old present-day Charlie. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 02:59, 13 August 2010 (EDT)		**No, because we would still have the young present-day Peter. But the young Charlie is gone, and now we have the old present-day Charlie. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 02:59, 13 August 2010 (EDT)
			* For the same reason this page is named "Charlie" and not "Charlene", we should use a picture of Jayme Mays to represent the character. That is how she is most widely and commonly known. A picture of Charlie in her advanced age can be included on the page (which it is), but should not be the lead image. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:03, 20 August 2010 (EDT)

	== Saving Charlie ==		== Saving Charlie ==

imported>Altes: /* New Picture */

2010-08-13T06:59:52Z

New Picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 13 August 2010
Line 100:		Line 100:
	I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)		I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
	*I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)		*I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
			**No, because we would still have the young present-day Peter. But the young Charlie is gone, and now we have the old present-day Charlie. {{User:Altes/Signature}} 02:59, 13 August 2010 (EDT)

	== Saving Charlie ==		== Saving Charlie ==

imported>Mc hammark: /* New Picture */

2010-08-12T22:06:02Z

New Picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:06, 12 August 2010
Line 99:		Line 99:

	I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)		I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)
			*I Buffy though, didn't viewers actually ''see'' him getting older and changing in appearance? The difference is, the older Charlie appeared once, and it was a huge age jump, rather than a continual or 'normal' changing process. If Peter borrowed time travel and went to a future, seeing himself as an old man, we wouldn't change his picture to that, would we? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 18:06, 12 August 2010 (EDT)

	== Saving Charlie ==		== Saving Charlie ==

imported>Altes: /* New Picture */

2010-08-12T10:11:54Z

New Picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:11, 12 August 2010
Line 97:		Line 97:
	*******I agree that we should change it back. Yes, it's how she is now, however the younger Charlie is how she is remembered (plus, if anyone comes here looking for info, the first thing they'll see is old Charlie, thus spoiling five chapters of buildup). --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 10:28, 9 February 2010 (EST)		*******I agree that we should change it back. Yes, it's how she is now, however the younger Charlie is how she is remembered (plus, if anyone comes here looking for info, the first thing they'll see is old Charlie, thus spoiling five chapters of buildup). --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 10:28, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	******** Agreed, I'd keep the young Charlie and just make sure that the current pic of her is included in the gallery. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 11:20, 9 February 2010 (EST))		******** Agreed, I'd keep the young Charlie and just make sure that the current pic of her is included in the gallery. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 11:20, 9 February 2010 (EST))

			I think we should still put an old Charlie pic. Taking the Buffy wiki as an example, Xander Harris has undergone significant changes in his appearance - he lost an eye, so his page displays a picture with the one-eyed Xander, although it happened near the end of the series. What do you think? {{User:Altes/Signature}} 06:11, 12 August 2010 (EDT)

	== Saving Charlie ==		== Saving Charlie ==

imported>Boycool42: /* Age */

2010-05-10T11:46:02Z

Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:46, 10 May 2010
Line 126:		Line 126:
	*****I seriously doubt it was 70. Unless she was 5 when she was killed? ;) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:37, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		*****I seriously doubt it was 70. Unless she was 5 when she was killed? ;) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:37, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
	******Ah. I didn't take the dates into consideration.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:41, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		******Ah. I didn't take the dates into consideration.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:41, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
			*******If she was much less than 85, Hiro would have been a statutory rapist. --{{User:Boycool42/sig1}} 07:46, 10 May 2010 (EDT)

imported>PJDEP: /* Age */

2010-05-08T21:41:35Z

Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 8 May 2010
Line 125:		Line 125:
	****I was thinking more like 70, but to your point, she was old.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:36, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		****I was thinking more like 70, but to your point, she was old.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:36, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
	*****I seriously doubt it was 70. Unless she was 5 when she was killed? ;) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:37, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		*****I seriously doubt it was 70. Unless she was 5 when she was killed? ;) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:37, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
			******Ah. I didn't take the dates into consideration.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:41, 8 May 2010 (EDT)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Age */

2010-05-08T21:37:43Z

Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:37, 8 May 2010
Line 124:		Line 124:
	***For the wiki, yes, but I think we can all agree that she would probably be somewhere in that age span. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		***For the wiki, yes, but I think we can all agree that she would probably be somewhere in that age span. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
	****I was thinking more like 70, but to your point, she was old.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:36, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		****I was thinking more like 70, but to your point, she was old.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:36, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
			*****I seriously doubt it was 70. Unless she was 5 when she was killed? ;) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:37, 8 May 2010 (EDT)

imported>PJDEP: /* Age */

2010-05-08T21:36:23Z

Age

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:36, 8 May 2010
Line 123:		Line 123:
	**Is it wrong to assume she's 85-90 in BNW?--{{User:Boycool42/sig1}} 16:46, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		**Is it wrong to assume she's 85-90 in BNW?--{{User:Boycool42/sig1}} 16:46, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
	***For the wiki, yes, but I think we can all agree that she would probably be somewhere in that age span. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)		***For the wiki, yes, but I think we can all agree that she would probably be somewhere in that age span. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:49, 8 May 2010 (EDT)
			****I was thinking more like 70, but to your point, she was old.--{{User:PJDEP/signature1}} 17:36, 8 May 2010 (EDT)