Talk:Claire Bennet (exposed future) - Revision history

imported>Citizen: /* Sandra dead? */

2008-12-13T02:39:03Z

Sandra dead?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 13 December 2008
(No difference)

imported>Citizen: /* Sandra dead? */

2008-12-13T02:39:03Z

Sandra dead?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 13 December 2008
Line 18:		Line 18:

	May I ask how we know that Sandra is dead in this future timeline? [[User:Freakatone\|Freakatone]] 21:22, 12 December 2008 (EST)		May I ask how we know that Sandra is dead in this future timeline? [[User:Freakatone\|Freakatone]] 21:22, 12 December 2008 (EST)
			*In [[Resistance]], Claire says she's still getting over the loss of her parents.--[[User:Citizen\|Citizen]] 21:39, 12 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Freakatone: /* Sandra dead? */ new section

2008-12-13T02:22:41Z

Sandra dead?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:22, 13 December 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:
	** That's speculation, as is what I'm about to say: Sylar could've killed Nathan before or after he became president. All we know is that he used Candice to help him become president, so he killed her first. I doubt Sylar would have the political intelligence (in spite of his aptitude) to become president himself. It's my bet that Nathan was president, as Linderman said he would be, but Sylar killed him and assumed his identity as president. In the end; Nathan was still president in Five Years Gone. Sylar was just using his identity. As long as everyone thought that he was president then for the most part he most certainly was. Plus: The consistencies are hardly accidental. Why not make Claire's hair red in one future, or keep it blond? Why not get rid of Peter's scar? Why have the presidency in Nathan's name each time? I think that if we get another future episode in Volume 4 (or 5 if they have one) and these things are present yet again then it should be noted, but fairly I think that you may be right for the time being. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 1:24, 17 November 2008		** That's speculation, as is what I'm about to say: Sylar could've killed Nathan before or after he became president. All we know is that he used Candice to help him become president, so he killed her first. I doubt Sylar would have the political intelligence (in spite of his aptitude) to become president himself. It's my bet that Nathan was president, as Linderman said he would be, but Sylar killed him and assumed his identity as president. In the end; Nathan was still president in Five Years Gone. Sylar was just using his identity. As long as everyone thought that he was president then for the most part he most certainly was. Plus: The consistencies are hardly accidental. Why not make Claire's hair red in one future, or keep it blond? Why not get rid of Peter's scar? Why have the presidency in Nathan's name each time? I think that if we get another future episode in Volume 4 (or 5 if they have one) and these things are present yet again then it should be noted, but fairly I think that you may be right for the time being. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 1:24, 17 November 2008
	* I think there was something in a recent BTE interview about some things that are present in all the futures...some things that cannot (or have yet to) be changed. The explosion is another example of this (though the location was different), or, if you want to include the outbreak future, a general catastrophe. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 04:37, 17 November 2008 (EST)		* I think there was something in a recent BTE interview about some things that are present in all the futures...some things that cannot (or have yet to) be changed. The explosion is another example of this (though the location was different), or, if you want to include the outbreak future, a general catastrophe. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 04:37, 17 November 2008 (EST)

			== Sandra dead? ==

			May I ask how we know that Sandra is dead in this future timeline? [[User:Freakatone\|Freakatone]] 21:22, 12 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Stevehim: /* I'm starting to think... */

2008-11-17T09:37:00Z

I'm starting to think...

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 17 November 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	* I think the consistencies are mostly skin deep--the physical similarities are minor. I think 5YG Claire was mousy and meek and ready to settle down...and yes, she had dark hair. IABD Claire was fierce and bold and full of inner turmoil...and she too had dark hair. The two Peter's were outwardly similar, but I found them to be morally very different. I don't believe 5YG Peter would have shot his brother, but who knows? I should also point out that Nathan was only president in one future--Sylar was the president in the other. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:48, 16 November 2008 (EST)		* I think the consistencies are mostly skin deep--the physical similarities are minor. I think 5YG Claire was mousy and meek and ready to settle down...and yes, she had dark hair. IABD Claire was fierce and bold and full of inner turmoil...and she too had dark hair. The two Peter's were outwardly similar, but I found them to be morally very different. I don't believe 5YG Peter would have shot his brother, but who knows? I should also point out that Nathan was only president in one future--Sylar was the president in the other. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:48, 16 November 2008 (EST)
	** That's speculation, as is what I'm about to say: Sylar could've killed Nathan before or after he became president. All we know is that he used Candice to help him become president, so he killed her first. I doubt Sylar would have the political intelligence (in spite of his aptitude) to become president himself. It's my bet that Nathan was president, as Linderman said he would be, but Sylar killed him and assumed his identity as president. In the end; Nathan was still president in Five Years Gone. Sylar was just using his identity. As long as everyone thought that he was president then for the most part he most certainly was. Plus: The consistencies are hardly accidental. Why not make Claire's hair red in one future, or keep it blond? Why not get rid of Peter's scar? Why have the presidency in Nathan's name each time? I think that if we get another future episode in Volume 4 (or 5 if they have one) and these things are present yet again then it should be noted, but fairly I think that you may be right for the time being. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 1:24, 17 November 2008		** That's speculation, as is what I'm about to say: Sylar could've killed Nathan before or after he became president. All we know is that he used Candice to help him become president, so he killed her first. I doubt Sylar would have the political intelligence (in spite of his aptitude) to become president himself. It's my bet that Nathan was president, as Linderman said he would be, but Sylar killed him and assumed his identity as president. In the end; Nathan was still president in Five Years Gone. Sylar was just using his identity. As long as everyone thought that he was president then for the most part he most certainly was. Plus: The consistencies are hardly accidental. Why not make Claire's hair red in one future, or keep it blond? Why not get rid of Peter's scar? Why have the presidency in Nathan's name each time? I think that if we get another future episode in Volume 4 (or 5 if they have one) and these things are present yet again then it should be noted, but fairly I think that you may be right for the time being. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 1:24, 17 November 2008
			* I think there was something in a recent BTE interview about some things that are present in all the futures...some things that cannot (or have yet to) be changed. The explosion is another example of this (though the location was different), or, if you want to include the outbreak future, a general catastrophe. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 04:37, 17 November 2008 (EST)

imported>FlamingTomDude: /* I'm starting to think... */

2008-11-17T06:24:46Z

I'm starting to think...

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 17 November 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Should there be a page about things that do not change with each future? Claire, in both the explosion and exposed futures, has brown hair. Peter has his scar in both. Nathan is president. These are serious consistencies that shouldn't be ignored. I also think that the outbreak future shouldn't count in this situation seeing as it was 2008 and not 2011. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 20:37, 16 November 2008 (EST)		Should there be a page about things that do not change with each future? Claire, in both the explosion and exposed futures, has brown hair. Peter has his scar in both. Nathan is president. These are serious consistencies that shouldn't be ignored. I also think that the outbreak future shouldn't count in this situation seeing as it was 2008 and not 2011. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 20:37, 16 November 2008 (EST)
	* I think the consistencies are mostly skin deep--the physical similarities are minor. I think 5YG Claire was mousy and meek and ready to settle down...and yes, she had dark hair. IABD Claire was fierce and bold and full of inner turmoil...and she too had dark hair. The two Peter's were outwardly similar, but I found them to be morally very different. I don't believe 5YG Peter would have shot his brother, but who knows? I should also point out that Nathan was only president in one future--Sylar was the president in the other. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:48, 16 November 2008 (EST)		* I think the consistencies are mostly skin deep--the physical similarities are minor. I think 5YG Claire was mousy and meek and ready to settle down...and yes, she had dark hair. IABD Claire was fierce and bold and full of inner turmoil...and she too had dark hair. The two Peter's were outwardly similar, but I found them to be morally very different. I don't believe 5YG Peter would have shot his brother, but who knows? I should also point out that Nathan was only president in one future--Sylar was the president in the other. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:48, 16 November 2008 (EST)
			** That's speculation, as is what I'm about to say: Sylar could've killed Nathan before or after he became president. All we know is that he used Candice to help him become president, so he killed her first. I doubt Sylar would have the political intelligence (in spite of his aptitude) to become president himself. It's my bet that Nathan was president, as Linderman said he would be, but Sylar killed him and assumed his identity as president. In the end; Nathan was still president in Five Years Gone. Sylar was just using his identity. As long as everyone thought that he was president then for the most part he most certainly was. Plus: The consistencies are hardly accidental. Why not make Claire's hair red in one future, or keep it blond? Why not get rid of Peter's scar? Why have the presidency in Nathan's name each time? I think that if we get another future episode in Volume 4 (or 5 if they have one) and these things are present yet again then it should be noted, but fairly I think that you may be right for the time being. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 1:24, 17 November 2008

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* I'm starting to think... */

2008-11-17T01:48:48Z

I'm starting to think...

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 17 November 2008
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Should there be a page about things that do not change with each future? Claire, in both the explosion and exposed futures, has brown hair. Peter has his scar in both. Nathan is president. These are serious consistencies that shouldn't be ignored. I also think that the outbreak future shouldn't count in this situation seeing as it was 2008 and not 2011. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 20:37, 16 November 2008 (EST)		Should there be a page about things that do not change with each future? Claire, in both the explosion and exposed futures, has brown hair. Peter has his scar in both. Nathan is president. These are serious consistencies that shouldn't be ignored. I also think that the outbreak future shouldn't count in this situation seeing as it was 2008 and not 2011. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 20:37, 16 November 2008 (EST)
			* I think the consistencies are mostly skin deep--the physical similarities are minor. I think 5YG Claire was mousy and meek and ready to settle down...and yes, she had dark hair. IABD Claire was fierce and bold and full of inner turmoil...and she too had dark hair. The two Peter's were outwardly similar, but I found them to be morally very different. I don't believe 5YG Peter would have shot his brother, but who knows? I should also point out that Nathan was only president in one future--Sylar was the president in the other. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:48, 16 November 2008 (EST)

imported>FlamingTomDude: /* I'm starting to think... */ new section

2008-11-17T01:37:16Z

I'm starting to think...: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 17 November 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	* That is what she'd be though. --[[User:Matchu\|Matchu]] 12:46, 10 October 2008 (EDT)		* That is what she'd be though. --[[User:Matchu\|Matchu]] 12:46, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
	** Right. Your step mother would be the woman who marries your father but is not your mother. This often happens when you are an adult. You might not call the woman your step mother, but she still is. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:14, 10 October 2008 (EDT)		** Right. Your step mother would be the woman who marries your father but is not your mother. This often happens when you are an adult. You might not call the woman your step mother, but she still is. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:14, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

			== I'm starting to think... ==

			Should there be a page about things that do not change with each future? Claire, in both the explosion and exposed futures, has brown hair. Peter has his scar in both. Nathan is president. These are serious consistencies that shouldn't be ignored. I also think that the outbreak future shouldn't count in this situation seeing as it was 2008 and not 2011. -- [[User:FlamingTomDude\|FlamingTomDude]] 20:37, 16 November 2008 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Tracy's relation */

2008-10-10T19:14:25Z

Tracy's relation

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 10 October 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	Since in the future, Tracy is married to Nathan, what should her relation to Claire be listed as? It seems weird to call her "step-mother" since it's not like she helped Nathan raise Claire. [[User:FlyingMan\|FlyingMan]] 00:44, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		Since in the future, Tracy is married to Nathan, what should her relation to Claire be listed as? It seems weird to call her "step-mother" since it's not like she helped Nathan raise Claire. [[User:FlyingMan\|FlyingMan]] 00:44, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
	* That is what she'd be though. --[[User:Matchu\|Matchu]] 12:46, 10 October 2008 (EDT)		* That is what she'd be though. --[[User:Matchu\|Matchu]] 12:46, 10 October 2008 (EDT)
			** Right. Your step mother would be the woman who marries your father but is not your mother. This often happens when you are an adult. You might not call the woman your step mother, but she still is. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:14, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>Matchu: /* Tracy's relation */

2008-10-10T16:46:32Z

Tracy's relation

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 10 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:

	Since in the future, Tracy is married to Nathan, what should her relation to Claire be listed as? It seems weird to call her "step-mother" since it's not like she helped Nathan raise Claire. [[User:FlyingMan\|FlyingMan]] 00:44, 8 October 2008 (EDT)		Since in the future, Tracy is married to Nathan, what should her relation to Claire be listed as? It seems weird to call her "step-mother" since it's not like she helped Nathan raise Claire. [[User:FlyingMan\|FlyingMan]] 00:44, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
			* That is what she'd be though. --[[User:Matchu\|Matchu]] 12:46, 10 October 2008 (EDT)

imported>FlyingMan: /* Tracy's relation */ new section

2008-10-08T04:44:27Z

Tracy's relation: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 8 October 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	*It should in fact, be renamed to "Clair Bennet (Exposed Future)". The current name is way too complex.		*It should in fact, be renamed to "Clair Bennet (Exposed Future)". The current name is way too complex.
	** Agree (though the parenthetical note shouldn't be capitalized). -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:06, 27 September 2008 (EDT)		** Agree (though the parenthetical note shouldn't be capitalized). -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:06, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

			== Tracy's relation ==

			Since in the future, Tracy is married to Nathan, what should her relation to Claire be listed as? It seems weird to call her "step-mother" since it's not like she helped Nathan raise Claire. [[User:FlyingMan\|FlyingMan]] 00:44, 8 October 2008 (EDT)