Talk:Debbie - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Cesarean */

2008-04-02T01:59:45Z

Cesarean

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 2 April 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Cesarean */

2008-04-02T01:59:45Z

Cesarean

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:59, 2 April 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* I find that part of the note rather confusing, regardless. Perhaps she had the babies when she was unconscious, but, believing she didn't know she had something(s) inside of her for 9 months takes more than a leap of faith. Even if the babies were removed as early as possible while still being able to live, I would assume she'd have realized something was amiss. Perhaps she did not realize she was having twins. I, again, find that hard to believe, but again, see it as <i>possible</i>. :/ {{User:Lulu/sig}} 21:31, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		* I find that part of the note rather confusing, regardless. Perhaps she had the babies when she was unconscious, but, believing she didn't know she had something(s) inside of her for 9 months takes more than a leap of faith. Even if the babies were removed as early as possible while still being able to live, I would assume she'd have realized something was amiss. Perhaps she did not realize she was having twins. I, again, find that hard to believe, but again, see it as <i>possible</i>. :/ {{User:Lulu/sig}} 21:31, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
	** Right, presumably they were born at the same time if they were "separated at birth". The mother may not have known she was having more than one.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 21:37, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		** Right, presumably they were born at the same time if they were "separated at birth". The mother may not have known she was having more than one.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 21:37, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
			*** I'd much rather leave the note as just what we know and can observe, and leave everything else out. Something like "In a dream, Debbie tells Piper that they were separated at birth. In waking life, Piper believes her dream, but her mother does not." -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:59, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Cesarean */

2008-04-02T01:37:48Z

Cesarean

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:37, 2 April 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:
	*** If unconscious, the mother cannot concentrate to push the baby out so it is normally done by c-section. That is what I meant. I tried to clarify it, but feel free to clarify further.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:27, 1 April 2008 (EDT).		*** If unconscious, the mother cannot concentrate to push the baby out so it is normally done by c-section. That is what I meant. I tried to clarify it, but feel free to clarify further.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:27, 1 April 2008 (EDT).
	* I find that part of the note rather confusing, regardless. Perhaps she had the babies when she was unconscious, but, believing she didn't know she had something(s) inside of her for 9 months takes more than a leap of faith. Even if the babies were removed as early as possible while still being able to live, I would assume she'd have realized something was amiss. Perhaps she did not realize she was having twins. I, again, find that hard to believe, but again, see it as <i>possible</i>. :/ {{User:Lulu/sig}} 21:31, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		* I find that part of the note rather confusing, regardless. Perhaps she had the babies when she was unconscious, but, believing she didn't know she had something(s) inside of her for 9 months takes more than a leap of faith. Even if the babies were removed as early as possible while still being able to live, I would assume she'd have realized something was amiss. Perhaps she did not realize she was having twins. I, again, find that hard to believe, but again, see it as <i>possible</i>. :/ {{User:Lulu/sig}} 21:31, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
			** Right, presumably they were born at the same time if they were "separated at birth". The mother may not have known she was having more than one.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 21:37, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Lulu: /* Cesarean */

2008-04-02T01:31:10Z

Cesarean

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:31, 2 April 2008
Line 6:		Line 6:
	** My wife had two and was completely conscious for both. (Quite an experience, I might add!) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		** My wife had two and was completely conscious for both. (Quite an experience, I might add!) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
	*** If unconscious, the mother cannot concentrate to push the baby out so it is normally done by c-section. That is what I meant. I tried to clarify it, but feel free to clarify further.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:27, 1 April 2008 (EDT).		*** If unconscious, the mother cannot concentrate to push the baby out so it is normally done by c-section. That is what I meant. I tried to clarify it, but feel free to clarify further.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:27, 1 April 2008 (EDT).
			* I find that part of the note rather confusing, regardless. Perhaps she had the babies when she was unconscious, but, believing she didn't know she had something(s) inside of her for 9 months takes more than a leap of faith. Even if the babies were removed as early as possible while still being able to live, I would assume she'd have realized something was amiss. Perhaps she did not realize she was having twins. I, again, find that hard to believe, but again, see it as <i>possible</i>. :/ {{User:Lulu/sig}} 21:31, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts at 00:27, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T00:27:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:27, 2 April 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	** Good points. I'll reword the note.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		** Good points. I'll reword the note.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
	** My wife had two and was completely conscious for both. (Quite an experience, I might add!) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		** My wife had two and was completely conscious for both. (Quite an experience, I might add!) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
			*** If unconscious, the mother cannot concentrate to push the baby out so it is normally done by c-section. That is what I meant. I tried to clarify it, but feel free to clarify further.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:27, 1 April 2008 (EDT).

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 00:22, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T00:22:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 2 April 2008
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* Additionally, it's [[wikipedia:Caesarean_section#Anaesthesia\|not at all uncommon for a mother to receive local rather than general anaesthesia for a c-section]]. C-section does not automatically mean unconscious.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:20, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		* Additionally, it's [[wikipedia:Caesarean_section#Anaesthesia\|not at all uncommon for a mother to receive local rather than general anaesthesia for a c-section]]. C-section does not automatically mean unconscious.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:20, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
	** Good points. I'll reword the note.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		** Good points. I'll reword the note.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
			** My wife had two and was completely conscious for both. (Quite an experience, I might add!) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts at 00:22, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T00:22:12Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:22, 2 April 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I'm not understanding the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		I'm not understanding the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
	* Additionally, it's [[wikipedia:Caesarean_section#Anaesthesia\|not at all uncommon for a mother to receive local rather than general anaesthesia for a c-section]]. C-section does not automatically mean unconscious.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:20, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		* Additionally, it's [[wikipedia:Caesarean_section#Anaesthesia\|not at all uncommon for a mother to receive local rather than general anaesthesia for a c-section]]. C-section does not automatically mean unconscious.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:20, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
			** Good points. I'll reword the note.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 20:22, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 00:20, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T00:20:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 2 April 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I'm not understanding the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		I'm not understanding the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)
			* Additionally, it's [[wikipedia:Caesarean_section#Anaesthesia\|not at all uncommon for a mother to receive local rather than general anaesthesia for a c-section]]. C-section does not automatically mean unconscious.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:20, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 00:19, 2 April 2008

2008-04-02T00:19:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 2 April 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Cesarean ==		== Cesarean ==

	I'm not ~~getting~~ the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)		I'm not understanding the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Cesarean

2008-04-02T00:19:05Z

Cesarean

New page

== Cesarean ==

I'm not getting the Cesarean information. Was there something in the novel that hinted at a Cesarean? If not, that part of the note should be removed since it just introduces ideas that aren't present. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 20:19, 1 April 2008 (EDT)