Talk:Dr. Witherson - Revision history

imported>Hardvice at 08:54, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T08:54:36Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 08:54, 10 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Hardvice at 08:54, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T08:54:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 10 March 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:
	***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)		****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			*****Yeah, I went back in the history and saw what you meant. Personally, I really dislike left-aligned images unless they're in the middle of a ''really'' long section (like a synopsis) because they always mess up the alignment of the section headings.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:54, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	**re: Galleries: There's no policy against having galleries on any sort of article, but I actually wish we had a lot fewer galleries than we do. Wikipedia (and I think Lostpedia as well) has run into copyright problems with "gratuitous" image galleries, as opposed to images that are necessary to illustrate the article. Parts of the fair use test consider both the portion of the work being used and the viability of other means of conveying the concept apart from base copying. It's not an actual problem, just something that makes me a bit nervous.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:52, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**re: Galleries: There's no policy against having galleries on any sort of article, but I actually wish we had a lot fewer galleries than we do. Wikipedia (and I think Lostpedia as well) has run into copyright problems with "gratuitous" image galleries, as opposed to images that are necessary to illustrate the article. Parts of the fair use test consider both the portion of the work being used and the viability of other means of conveying the concept apart from base copying. It's not an actual problem, just something that makes me a bit nervous.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:52, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 08:52, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T08:52:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 10 March 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:
	***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)		****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			**re: Galleries: There's no policy against having galleries on any sort of article, but I actually wish we had a lot fewer galleries than we do. Wikipedia (and I think Lostpedia as well) has run into copyright problems with "gratuitous" image galleries, as opposed to images that are necessary to illustrate the article. Parts of the fair use test consider both the portion of the work being used and the viability of other means of conveying the concept apart from base copying. It's not an actual problem, just something that makes me a bit nervous.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:52, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack) */

2007-03-10T08:44:27Z

Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 10 March 2007
Line 49:		Line 49:
	**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 08:19, 10 March 2007

2007-03-10T08:19:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 10 March 2007
Line 48:		Line 48:
	***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>WolvenSpectre: /* Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack) */

2007-03-10T08:08:30Z

Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 10 March 2007
Line 47:		Line 47:
	**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack) */

2007-03-10T08:06:32Z

Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:06, 10 March 2007
Line 46:		Line 46:
	*If you want it back, that's fine, I won't remove it. But it was really throwing off the layout of the page on a few viewers. It'd be one thing if there was more history, but this pic was running into the bottom of the page -- it was odd.... We generally try to have galleries for articles (with the exception of episode articles and main characters, it seems). I started to look for another good pic of Witherson, but I got lazy. :) Anyway, the pic is still on [[Jessica's victims]], where it makes the most sense. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:47, 10 March 2007 (EST)		*If you want it back, that's fine, I won't remove it. But it was really throwing off the layout of the page on a few viewers. It'd be one thing if there was more history, but this pic was running into the bottom of the page -- it was odd.... We generally try to have galleries for articles (with the exception of episode articles and main characters, it seems). I started to look for another good pic of Witherson, but I got lazy. :) Anyway, the pic is still on [[Jessica's victims]], where it makes the most sense. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:47, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>WolvenSpectre: /* Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack) */

2007-03-10T08:02:12Z

Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:02, 10 March 2007
Line 45:		Line 45:
	*Did you see Ryan's edit summary? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:43, 10 March 2007 (EST))		*Did you see Ryan's edit summary? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:43, 10 March 2007 (EST))
	*If you want it back, that's fine, I won't remove it. But it was really throwing off the layout of the page on a few viewers. It'd be one thing if there was more history, but this pic was running into the bottom of the page -- it was odd.... We generally try to have galleries for articles (with the exception of episode articles and main characters, it seems). I started to look for another good pic of Witherson, but I got lazy. :) Anyway, the pic is still on [[Jessica's victims]], where it makes the most sense. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:47, 10 March 2007 (EST)		*If you want it back, that's fine, I won't remove it. But it was really throwing off the layout of the page on a few viewers. It'd be one thing if there was more history, but this pic was running into the bottom of the page -- it was odd.... We generally try to have galleries for articles (with the exception of episode articles and main characters, it seems). I started to look for another good pic of Witherson, but I got lazy. :) Anyway, the pic is still on [[Jessica's victims]], where it makes the most sense. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:47, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack) */

2007-03-10T07:47:53Z

Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:47, 10 March 2007
Line 44:		Line 44:
	I was just wondering why the image, cropped to hide her worst injury but still showing the TASER wounds was removed. I thought it was both relevent and appre po, not to mention tastefully done. Someone could have posted somthing much more graphic and sensational.<p>I just thought that I would ask before reinstating it and starting a back and forth over it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 02:37, 10 March 2007 (EST)		I was just wondering why the image, cropped to hide her worst injury but still showing the TASER wounds was removed. I thought it was both relevent and appre po, not to mention tastefully done. Someone could have posted somthing much more graphic and sensational.<p>I just thought that I would ask before reinstating it and starting a back and forth over it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 02:37, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	*Did you see Ryan's edit summary? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:43, 10 March 2007 (EST))		*Did you see Ryan's edit summary? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:43, 10 March 2007 (EST))
			*If you want it back, that's fine, I won't remove it. But it was really throwing off the layout of the page on a few viewers. It'd be one thing if there was more history, but this pic was running into the bottom of the page -- it was odd.... We generally try to have galleries for articles (with the exception of episode articles and main characters, it seems). I started to look for another good pic of Witherson, but I got lazy. :) Anyway, the pic is still on [[Jessica's victims]], where it makes the most sense. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 02:47, 10 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Admin: /* Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack) */

2007-03-10T07:43:05Z

Removal of The Doctor's photo (after the attack)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:43, 10 March 2007
Line 43:		Line 43:

	I was just wondering why the image, cropped to hide her worst injury but still showing the TASER wounds was removed. I thought it was both relevent and appre po, not to mention tastefully done. Someone could have posted somthing much more graphic and sensational.<p>I just thought that I would ask before reinstating it and starting a back and forth over it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 02:37, 10 March 2007 (EST)		I was just wondering why the image, cropped to hide her worst injury but still showing the TASER wounds was removed. I thought it was both relevent and appre po, not to mention tastefully done. Someone could have posted somthing much more graphic and sensational.<p>I just thought that I would ask before reinstating it and starting a back and forth over it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 02:37, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			*Did you see Ryan's edit summary? ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 02:43, 10 March 2007 (EST))

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:54, 10 March 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:
	***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)		****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			*****Yeah, I went back in the history and saw what you meant. Personally, I really dislike left-aligned images unless they're in the middle of a ''really'' long section (like a synopsis) because they always mess up the alignment of the section headings.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:54, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	**re: Galleries: There's no policy against having galleries on any sort of article, but I actually wish we had a lot fewer galleries than we do. Wikipedia (and I think Lostpedia as well) has run into copyright problems with "gratuitous" image galleries, as opposed to images that are necessary to illustrate the article. Parts of the fair use test consider both the portion of the work being used and the viability of other means of conveying the concept apart from base copying. It's not an actual problem, just something that makes me a bit nervous.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:52, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**re: Galleries: There's no policy against having galleries on any sort of article, but I actually wish we had a lot fewer galleries than we do. Wikipedia (and I think Lostpedia as well) has run into copyright problems with "gratuitous" image galleries, as opposed to images that are necessary to illustrate the article. Parts of the fair use test consider both the portion of the work being used and the viability of other means of conveying the concept apart from base copying. It's not an actual problem, just something that makes me a bit nervous.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:52, 10 March 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:52, 10 March 2007
Line 50:		Line 50:
	***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)		****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			**re: Galleries: There's no policy against having galleries on any sort of article, but I actually wish we had a lot fewer galleries than we do. Wikipedia (and I think Lostpedia as well) has run into copyright problems with "gratuitous" image galleries, as opposed to images that are necessary to illustrate the article. Parts of the fair use test consider both the portion of the work being used and the viability of other means of conveying the concept apart from base copying. It's not an actual problem, just something that makes me a bit nervous.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:52, 10 March 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:44, 10 March 2007
Line 49:		Line 49:
	**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			****It was pushing the Quotes and Notes over, and was squishing it all up against the infobox, like a pizza pie held on its side. Please forgive my poor similes, I'm tired, and heading to bed. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:44, 10 March 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:19, 10 March 2007
Line 48:		Line 48:
	***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			***It's probably less browser-dependent and more resolution-dependent. At least, most image flow problems on Wikis are; I didn't see this specific one.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:19, 10 March 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:08, 10 March 2007
Line 47:		Line 47:
	**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)		**I accidentally missed the first line of it, only saw the part about the "Withers" note being corrected, I was going to do it myself but was busy. I didn't think it was throwingoff layout, but I could have missed that too.<p>I think that having images in multiple places as long as it is relevant to both articles, is a good thing. Just because some people might read only a singl article and not follow it up by taking it further to other articles to see the image (or other resource).<p>By the way did I mention I was half blind? Maybe thats why I missed that...<p>Well thats my story and I'm sticking to it.--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:02, 10 March 2007 (EST)
	***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)		***I agree that an image can be used in multiple places (see [[Special:Mostimages\|here]]), that wasn't the reason I took off the image. If you want to get another pic of Dr. Witherson, go for it -- then we can add a gallery. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 03:06, 10 March 2007 (EST)
			**I use Opera 9.0, Firefox 2.0, and (ugh) IE 6.x. I have visited this page with all three and have never seen what you described. What are you using??<p>PS: stop posting while I am writing my posts! ;P....--[[User:WolvenSpectre\|WolvenSpectre]] 03:08, 10 March 2007 (EST)