Talk:Duplication - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Redirecting to Talk:Cloning

2008-06-12T01:48:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 12 June 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Redirecting to Talk:Cloning

2008-06-12T01:48:04Z

Redirecting to Talk:Cloning

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:48, 12 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	#REDIRECT [[Talk:~~Replication~~]]		#REDIRECT [[Talk:Cloning]]

imported>Heroe: change link

2007-11-30T05:16:40Z

change link

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:16, 30 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	#REDIRECT [[~~replication~~]]		#REDIRECT [[Talk:Replication]]

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Redirecting to Replication

2007-11-28T05:11:34Z

Redirecting to Replication

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 28 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	#REDIRECT [[~~Talk:Cloning~~]]		#REDIRECT [[replication]]

imported>Hardvice: redirect to centralize discussion

2007-11-27T09:03:08Z

redirect to centralize discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 27 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		⚫	#REDIRECT [[Talk:Cloning]]
	{{power names\|2\|eos="...he was fighting a man who could create duplicates of himself, clones." {{epp\|gn61}}}}
	==Name?==
	* [[Duplication]]
	* [[Replication]]
⚫	* [[Cloning]]
	All of these are mentioned in some way in the GN (none directly, just "duplicates," "replicates," "clones"). I could go either way, but the page should be moved (if necessary) to the "correct" page, and the others should be redirects.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:48, 27 November 2007 (EST)

	Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)
	* I just went with "cloning" because it was already redlinked from [[Evan]]. I actually prefer duplication or replication because they're less "loaded" than cloning, but it's really all about the same to me. If anything, we could go with "replication" because it appears in the text of the novel, while the other two only appear in the introduction, but I don't think that really matters.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:57, 27 November 2007 (EST)
	* For now, I'll go ahead and merge these two articles under "cloning" and we can go with whatever name people like later, just to keep the discussion centralized.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:00, 27 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 09:00, 27 November 2007

2007-11-27T09:00:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:00, 27 November 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)		Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)
	* I just went with "cloning" because it was already redlinked from [[Evan]]. I actually prefer duplication or replication because they're less "loaded" than cloning, but it's really all about the same to me. If anything, we could go with "replication" because it appears in the text of the novel, while the other two only appear in the introduction, but I don't think that really matters.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:57, 27 November 2007 (EST)		* I just went with "cloning" because it was already redlinked from [[Evan]]. I actually prefer duplication or replication because they're less "loaded" than cloning, but it's really all about the same to me. If anything, we could go with "replication" because it appears in the text of the novel, while the other two only appear in the introduction, but I don't think that really matters.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:57, 27 November 2007 (EST)
			* For now, I'll go ahead and merge these two articles under "cloning" and we can go with whatever name people like later, just to keep the discussion centralized.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:00, 27 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 08:57, 27 November 2007

2007-11-27T08:57:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:57, 27 November 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)		Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)
			* I just went with "cloning" because it was already redlinked from [[Evan]]. I actually prefer duplication or replication because they're less "loaded" than cloning, but it's really all about the same to me. If anything, we could go with "replication" because it appears in the text of the novel, while the other two only appear in the introduction, but I don't think that really matters.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:57, 27 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Tim Thomason: /* Name? */

2007-11-27T08:51:50Z

Name?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 27 November 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* [[Cloning]]		* [[Cloning]]
	All of these are mentioned in some way in the GN (none directly, just "duplicates," "replicates," "clones"). I could go either way, but the page should be moved (if necessary) to the "correct" page, and the others should be redirects.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:48, 27 November 2007 (EST)		All of these are mentioned in some way in the GN (none directly, just "duplicates," "replicates," "clones"). I could go either way, but the page should be moved (if necessary) to the "correct" page, and the others should be redirects.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:48, 27 November 2007 (EST)

			Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Tim Thomason at 08:48, 27 November 2007

2007-11-27T08:48:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:48, 27 November 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{power names\|2\|eos="...he was fighting a man who could create duplicates of himself, clones." {{epp\|gn61}}}}		{{power names\|2\|eos="...he was fighting a man who could create duplicates of himself, clones." {{epp\|gn61}}}}
			==Name?==
			* [[Duplication]]
			* [[Replication]]
			* [[Cloning]]
			All of these are mentioned in some way in the GN (none directly, just "duplicates," "replicates," "clones"). I could go either way, but the page should be moved (if necessary) to the "correct" page, and the others should be redirects.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:48, 27 November 2007 (EST)

imported>Tim Thomason: New page: {{power names|2|eos="...he was fighting a man who could create duplicates of himself, clones." {{epp|gn61}}}}

2007-11-27T08:42:10Z

New page: {{power names|2|eos="...he was fighting a man who could create duplicates of himself, clones." {{epp|gn61}}}}

New page

{{power names|2|eos="...he was fighting a man who could create duplicates of himself, clones." {{epp|gn61}}}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:00, 27 November 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)		Okay, someone created cloning (I made mine first!), but it's better than mine, so I guess merging won't be necessary.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 03:51, 27 November 2007 (EST)
	* I just went with "cloning" because it was already redlinked from [[Evan]]. I actually prefer duplication or replication because they're less "loaded" than cloning, but it's really all about the same to me. If anything, we could go with "replication" because it appears in the text of the novel, while the other two only appear in the introduction, but I don't think that really matters.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:57, 27 November 2007 (EST)		* I just went with "cloning" because it was already redlinked from [[Evan]]. I actually prefer duplication or replication because they're less "loaded" than cloning, but it's really all about the same to me. If anything, we could go with "replication" because it appears in the text of the novel, while the other two only appear in the introduction, but I don't think that really matters.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 03:57, 27 November 2007 (EST)
			* For now, I'll go ahead and merge these two articles under "cloning" and we can go with whatever name people like later, just to keep the discussion centralized.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:00, 27 November 2007 (EST)