Talk:Electromagnetism - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: redirect -- this page is already archived at Talk:Electromagnetism/Archive 3

2008-12-18T02:34:02Z

redirect -- this page is already archived at Talk:Electromagnetism/Archive 3

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 18 December 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: redirect -- this page is already archived at Talk:Electromagnetism/Archive 3

2008-12-18T02:34:02Z

redirect -- this page is already archived at Talk:Electromagnetism/Archive 3

Show changes

imported>Admin: Talk:Electromagnetism(Merged) moved to Talk:Electromagnetism over redirect: content gets merged manually, then page is deleted... not moved

2008-12-15T17:00:36Z

Talk:Electromagnetism(Merged) moved to Talk:Electromagnetism over redirect: content gets merged manually, then page is deleted... not moved

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 15 December 2008
(No difference)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: Talk:Electromagnetism moved to Talk:Electromagnetism(Merged): Need an admin to merge over the discussion page

2008-12-15T16:33:09Z

Talk:Electromagnetism moved to Talk:Electromagnetism(Merged): Need an admin to merge over the discussion page

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 15 December 2008
(No difference)

imported>HiroDynoSlayer: /* Merge with Electric manipulation */

2008-12-15T16:17:52Z

Merge with Electric manipulation

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 15 December 2008
Line 132:		Line 132:
	***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)		***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)
	******Nothing new to say that no one else has said yet. I say go for it. [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 20:43, 12 December 2008 (EST)		******Nothing new to say that no one else has said yet. I say go for it. [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 20:43, 12 December 2008 (EST)
			******* Everyone that has voiced in has been positive for the merger now under the present conditions; so let's getter done. <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 12/15/2008 11:17 (EST)</small>

imported>Psilaq Remake at 01:43, 13 December 2008

2008-12-13T01:43:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 13 December 2008
Line 131:		Line 131:
	**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)		**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)		***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			******Nothing new to say that no one else has said yet. I say go for it. [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 20:43, 12 December 2008 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Merge with Electric manipulation */

2008-12-11T06:56:40Z

Merge with Electric manipulation

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 11 December 2008
Line 130:		Line 130:
	*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)		*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)		**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	***** I've already given my reasons that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)		***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Merge with Electric manipulation */

2008-12-11T06:54:41Z

Merge with Electric manipulation

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 11 December 2008
Line 130:		Line 130:
	*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)		*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)		**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)
			***** I've already given my reasons that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Thrashmeister: /* Merge with Electric manipulation */

2008-12-11T04:04:51Z

Merge with Electric manipulation

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:04, 11 December 2008
Line 129:		Line 129:
	**Electricity can be manipulated to cause levitation as it has been stated above: Electrostatic Levitation for example. Elle's assignment tracker has her control index at 45%. It is possible that the Agent has more control over his ability and is able to manipulate electricity to levitate. -- [[User:Cael\|Cael]] 23:42, 9 December 2008 (EST)		**Electricity can be manipulated to cause levitation as it has been stated above: Electrostatic Levitation for example. Elle's assignment tracker has her control index at 45%. It is possible that the Agent has more control over his ability and is able to manipulate electricity to levitate. -- [[User:Cael\|Cael]] 23:42, 9 December 2008 (EST)
	*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)		*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)
			**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 04:02, 11 December 2008

2008-12-11T04:02:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 11 December 2008
Line 128:		Line 128:
	*No real one here, DO IT! The only sticking point would be the Agent levitating but that can easily be rationalized away by one of two ways; say that the agent has [[flight]] as a byproduct of electric manip and properly note this on the flight page, or (lots more speculation) say that the agent possessed flight as an outright, separate ability that he absorbed from someone.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 22:42, 9 December 2008 (EST)		*No real one here, DO IT! The only sticking point would be the Agent levitating but that can easily be rationalized away by one of two ways; say that the agent has [[flight]] as a byproduct of electric manip and properly note this on the flight page, or (lots more speculation) say that the agent possessed flight as an outright, separate ability that he absorbed from someone.--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 22:42, 9 December 2008 (EST)
	**Electricity can be manipulated to cause levitation as it has been stated above: Electrostatic Levitation for example. Elle's assignment tracker has her control index at 45%. It is possible that the Agent has more control over his ability and is able to manipulate electricity to levitate. -- [[User:Cael\|Cael]] 23:42, 9 December 2008 (EST)		**Electricity can be manipulated to cause levitation as it has been stated above: Electrostatic Levitation for example. Elle's assignment tracker has her control index at 45%. It is possible that the Agent has more control over his ability and is able to manipulate electricity to levitate. -- [[User:Cael\|Cael]] 23:42, 9 December 2008 (EST)
			*** I'm all for the rename. In the "first" big discussion, we had never really seen evolution of abilities (Matt could only read minds, Hiro had only just learned how to teleport another person, and Peter was just coming to terms with how his ability works). So we've learned quite a bit since then--learning which, if we had "back then", would have possibly allowed for the thought that somebody with Elle's power could possibly levitate, too. That was the main argument--Elle couldn't levitate, but the agent could. Hmm. Seems almost silly now. Even sillier considering that Peter referred to the power as "lightning". Regardless, I think we've got a great opportunity now for a much better solution--Elle's assignment tracker profile refers to the power she has as "electric manipulation". With fresh eyes, the agent's power sure looks and feels like Elle's power, with the exception of the levitation. But levitating by manipulating electricity sure seems to fit under the umbrella of "electric manipulation". I'm all for the merge. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:02, 10 December 2008 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 15 December 2008
Line 132:		Line 132:
	***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)		***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)
	******Nothing new to say that no one else has said yet. I say go for it. [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 20:43, 12 December 2008 (EST)		******Nothing new to say that no one else has said yet. I say go for it. [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 20:43, 12 December 2008 (EST)
			******* Everyone that has voiced in has been positive for the merger now under the present conditions; so let's getter done. <small>--[[User:HiroDynoSlayer\|HiroDynoSlayer]] ([[User talk:HiroDynoSlayer\|talk]]) 12/15/2008 11:17 (EST)</small>

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:43, 13 December 2008
Line 131:		Line 131:
	**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)		**** Agreed, as per all the above reasons. Nothing new I can really say. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 23:04, 10 December 2008 (EST)
	***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)		***** I've already given my reasons and said that I now agree with the merge. I do think, though, that "electrostatic levitation" should not be mentioned in the article, or even it be specified that the levitation is due to electricity. Though that is possible, that is also speculation we don't have to make. We just have to document how the ability is referred to in the novel, and that the agent appears to levitate. (See my comments last year to understand why I think electrostatic levitation is wrong.)--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:54, 11 December 2008 (EST)
			******Nothing new to say that no one else has said yet. I say go for it. [[User:Psilaq Remake\|Psilaq Remake]] 20:43, 12 December 2008 (EST)