Talk:Exploding Man (painting) - Revision history

imported>Leckie: /* Current Status */

2009-12-26T15:47:25Z

Current Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 26 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Leckie: /* Current Status */

2009-12-26T15:47:25Z

Current Status

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 26 December 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	== Current Status ==		== Current Status ==

	Are we absolutely sure that it is still in ~~[[Isacc~~'s apartment]]? Its just, when [[Mohinder]] moved into his lab there, all the paintings were moved out, by [[Company\|the company]], am I right? -- {{User:Leckie/Signature 7}} 10:46, 26 December 2009 (EST)		Are we absolutely sure that it is still in Issac's apartment? Its just, when [[Mohinder]] moved into his lab there, all the paintings were moved out, by [[Company\|the company]], am I right? -- {{User:Leckie/Signature 7}} 10:46, 26 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Leckie: /* Current Status */ new section

2009-12-26T15:46:10Z

Current Status: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:46, 26 December 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
	**Rog. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 02:07, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		**Rog. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 02:07, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

			== Current Status ==

			Are we absolutely sure that it is still in [[Isacc's apartment]]? Its just, when [[Mohinder]] moved into his lab there, all the paintings were moved out, by [[Company\|the company]], am I right? -- {{User:Leckie/Signature 7}} 10:46, 26 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* Tomorrow Night */

2007-05-21T06:07:22Z

Tomorrow Night

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 21 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
	*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
			**Rog. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 02:07, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Tomorrow Night */

2007-05-21T05:56:34Z

Tomorrow Night

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 21 May 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:

	So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
			*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo: Tomorrow Night

2007-05-21T05:06:22Z

Tomorrow Night

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:06, 21 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	* I think that might make it confusing for searchers. It's a pain to link to, but the parenthetical is clearer.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 29 December 2006 (EST)		* I think that might make it confusing for searchers. It's a pain to link to, but the parenthetical is clearer.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 29 December 2006 (EST)
	** I went ahead with a redirect so that "Exploding Man" goes to "Exploding Man (painting)". At some point, we might have another topic for which the name would be appropriate, at which point the redirect would become a disambiguation. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 22:17, 29 December 2006 (EST)		** I went ahead with a redirect so that "Exploding Man" goes to "Exploding Man (painting)". At some point, we might have another topic for which the name would be appropriate, at which point the redirect would become a disambiguation. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 22:17, 29 December 2006 (EST)

			== Tomorrow Night ==

			So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ted C at 03:17, 30 December 2006

2006-12-30T03:17:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:17, 30 December 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	I know I created the name of the article, but does anybody else think this article should just be called "Exploding Man" without the "(painting)" part? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:25, 29 December 2006 (EST)		I know I created the name of the article, but does anybody else think this article should just be called "Exploding Man" without the "(painting)" part? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:25, 29 December 2006 (EST)
	* I think that might make it confusing for searchers. It's a pain to link to, but the parenthetical is clearer.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 29 December 2006 (EST)		* I think that might make it confusing for searchers. It's a pain to link to, but the parenthetical is clearer.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 29 December 2006 (EST)
			** I went ahead with a redirect so that "Exploding Man" goes to "Exploding Man (painting)". At some point, we might have another topic for which the name would be appropriate, at which point the redirect would become a disambiguation. --[[User:Ted C\|Ted C]] 22:17, 29 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 23:57, 29 December 2006

2006-12-29T23:57:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 29 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I know I created the name of the article, but does anybody else think this article should just be called "Exploding Man" without the "(painting)" part? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:25, 29 December 2006 (EST)		I know I created the name of the article, but does anybody else think this article should just be called "Exploding Man" without the "(painting)" part? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:25, 29 December 2006 (EST)
			* I think that might make it confusing for searchers. It's a pain to link to, but the parenthetical is clearer.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:57, 29 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Name of article

2006-12-29T23:25:48Z

Name of article

New page

== Name of article ==

I know I created the name of the article, but does anybody else think this article should just be called "Exploding Man" without the "(painting)" part? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart|talk]]) 18:25, 29 December 2006 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:07, 21 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		So once we find out who this is (if the explosion even happens), should we go and tag the paintings with the respective character image category? --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 01:06, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
	*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)		*Let's wait to find out what happens of course. But I don't think it really matters if this vague painting is correctly identified or not. The character image categories, in my opinion, are more about saying, "Oh, where is that one picture of Claire?" and being able to find it easily. Or it's just about looking at pictures of a character. This painting (and other vague images) won't really hurt to be in a particular category, but it's not really necessary, if you ask me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 01:56, 21 May 2007 (EDT)
			**Rog. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 02:07, 21 May 2007 (EDT)