Talk:Family - Revision history

imported>Mc hammark: /* Update */ new section

2009-10-18T21:42:22Z

Update: new section

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:42, 18 October 2009
(No difference)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Update */ new section

2009-10-18T21:42:22Z

Update: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 18 October 2009
Line 77:		Line 77:
	* I think we can automate the 3-column list of families using DPL since they should all have the family disambig category. Not sure that it's worth it just yet, but I thought I'd mention it here since I expect it to become increasing more time consuming to manually update as we add more families.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (EDT)		* I think we can automate the 3-column list of families using DPL since they should all have the family disambig category. Not sure that it's worth it just yet, but I thought I'd mention it here since I expect it to become increasing more time consuming to manually update as we add more families.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
	* Personally, I don't think it's necessary. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:01, 2 April 2008 (EDT)		* Personally, I don't think it's necessary. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:01, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

			== Update ==

			What with Samuel's quest to look after his family, I'd say that this page is in need of an update and there are some stubs to be fixed as well. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:42, 18 October 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* List of families automation */

2008-04-02T05:01:36Z

List of families automation

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:01, 2 April 2008
Line 76:		Line 76:
	==List of families automation==		==List of families automation==
	* I think we can automate the 3-column list of families using DPL since they should all have the family disambig category. Not sure that it's worth it just yet, but I thought I'd mention it here since I expect it to become increasing more time consuming to manually update as we add more families.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (EDT)		* I think we can automate the 3-column list of families using DPL since they should all have the family disambig category. Not sure that it's worth it just yet, but I thought I'd mention it here since I expect it to become increasing more time consuming to manually update as we add more families.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (EDT)
			* Personally, I don't think it's necessary. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 01:01, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: automation

2008-04-02T05:00:15Z

automation

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:00, 2 April 2008
Line 73:		Line 73:
	**Agree. However, I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		**Agree. However, I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

			==List of families automation==
			* I think we can automate the 3-column list of families using DPL since they should all have the family disambig category. Not sure that it's worth it just yet, but I thought I'd mention it here since I expect it to become increasing more time consuming to manually update as we add more families.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Templates for each family */ clarify

2007-10-17T05:11:32Z

Templates for each family: clarify

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 17 October 2007
Line 71:		Line 71:
	I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		**Agree. However, I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 05:09, 17 October 2007

2007-10-17T05:09:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 17 October 2007
Line 72:		Line 72:
	* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Templates for each family */

2007-10-17T04:55:30Z

Templates for each family

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 17 October 2007
Line 71:		Line 71:
	I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice at 04:44, 17 October 2007

2007-10-17T04:44:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:44, 17 October 2007
Line 70:		Line 70:
	== Templates for each family ==		== Templates for each family ==
	I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>Rayhond at 04:35, 17 October 2007

2007-10-17T04:35:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:35, 17 October 2007
Line 67:		Line 67:
	:::It occurs to me that we can easily combine the two, and put family trees on the disambig pages. That way, there's a ready-made category. I agree re: the image maps ... the tables are serviceable, but it'll look much nicer as an image map.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:23, 9 January 2007 (EST)		:::It occurs to me that we can easily combine the two, and put family trees on the disambig pages. That way, there's a ready-made category. I agree re: the image maps ... the tables are serviceable, but it'll look much nicer as an image map.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:23, 9 January 2007 (EST)
	* the Suresh Family was missing from the list of families portion. I took the liberty of adding it. If anyone objects, holler. [[User:SacValleyDweller\|SacValleyDweller]] 01:32, 30 July 2007 (EDT)		* the Suresh Family was missing from the list of families portion. I took the liberty of adding it. If anyone objects, holler. [[User:SacValleyDweller\|SacValleyDweller]] 01:32, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

			== Templates for each family ==
			I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* page for each family */

2007-07-30T05:32:04Z

page for each family

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:32, 30 July 2007
Line 66:		Line 66:
	::* I remember somewhere, that there is a difference between a solid line and a dotted line, such as adoption, so that could be good to know for the Bennets. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 10:40, 9 January 2007 (EST)		::* I remember somewhere, that there is a difference between a solid line and a dotted line, such as adoption, so that could be good to know for the Bennets. --{{User:ohmyn0/sig}} 10:40, 9 January 2007 (EST)
	:::It occurs to me that we can easily combine the two, and put family trees on the disambig pages. That way, there's a ready-made category. I agree re: the image maps ... the tables are serviceable, but it'll look much nicer as an image map.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:23, 9 January 2007 (EST)		:::It occurs to me that we can easily combine the two, and put family trees on the disambig pages. That way, there's a ready-made category. I agree re: the image maps ... the tables are serviceable, but it'll look much nicer as an image map.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 12:23, 9 January 2007 (EST)
			* the Suresh Family was missing from the list of families portion. I took the liberty of adding it. If anyone objects, holler. [[User:SacValleyDweller\|SacValleyDweller]] 01:32, 30 July 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:11, 17 October 2007
Line 71:		Line 71:
	I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		**Agree. However, I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:09, 17 October 2007
Line 72:		Line 72:
	* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			*** Yeah, ''that's'' pretty cool (if a bit huge ... wonder if can come up with a way to automagically scale down our existing trees?) But another navbar would not be so cool.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:09, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 17 October 2007
Line 71:		Line 71:
	I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		I was wondering if you could make templetes for each family beacuse you have templetes for the graphic novels' characters. [[User:Rayhond\|Rayhond]] 00:35, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
	* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		* Do you mean a navbar like [[Template:GN_Sanderses\|this one]]? It's possible, but all of the character pages already have the [[Template:Characternav\|character navbar]], and more than one navbar looks kind of ugly. Family relationships are already noted in the character's infobox, too.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 00:44, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
			**I think we could have a conversation about a family tree on character pages. I like the idea on [[fr:Claire Bennet#Sa Famille\|the French wiki]], though I wonder if it'd be too much on some already crowded pages. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:55, 17 October 2007 (EDT)