Talk:Gerald Dickinson - Revision history

imported>Radicell: unneeded link

2015-09-20T03:25:32Z

unneeded link

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:25, 20 September 2015
(No difference)

imported>Radicell: unneeded link

2015-09-20T03:25:32Z

unneeded link

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:25, 20 September 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
	* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))		* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))
	** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		** Right you are. I think we can follow the McSorley principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)		*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
	**** Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		**** Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 22:39, 24 August 2009

2009-08-24T22:39:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 24 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)		*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
	Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		**** Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
	****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		***** Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	*****Bump... --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 05:59, 24 August 2009 (EDT)		****** Bump... --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 05:59, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
			******* I'll go ahead and delete it now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:39, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

imported>Radicell at 09:59, 24 August 2009

2009-08-24T09:59:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 24 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
	****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
			*****Bump... --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 05:59, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

imported>Lolwut at 09:37, 4 July 2009

2009-07-04T09:37:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 4 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)		*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
	Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
			****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)

imported>Crazylicious at 02:21, 18 May 2009

2009-05-18T02:21:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:21, 18 May 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)		*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
			Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>Radicell at 13:49, 3 April 2009

2009-04-03T13:49:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:49, 3 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))		* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))
	** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
			*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 20:07, 26 September 2008

2008-09-26T20:07:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 26 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
	* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))		* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))
			** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

imported>Admin at 19:55, 26 September 2008

2008-09-26T19:55:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:55, 26 September 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
			* Agreed. Now if we never hear about him again then I'd entertain deleting the page, but for now I think it can stay. His demise may yet to be part of the storyline... it's coincidental afterall that a NY senator would die and Nathan just so happened to be a NY congressman. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 15:55, 26 September 2008 (EDT))

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simpl...

2008-09-26T19:45:56Z

New page: I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simpl...

New page

I don't think this article needs to be deleted. They mentioned his name a few times, and made the point of saying that he had an untimely death. Normally throwaway characters who are simply mentioned to further the plot are barely given consideration--Sentator Dickinson was mentioned a few times, was given a first and last name, and has mystery surrounding him. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:45, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:39, 24 August 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)		** Right you are. I think we can follow the [[McSorley]] principle--create the article if the guy seems like he's going to be important (and people are going to search for him), but delete him if he doesn't pan out. Who knows, he may end up being our next [[Linderman]]...or [[Mr. Petrelli]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:07, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
	*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)		*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
	Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		**** Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
	****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		***** Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
	*****Bump... --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 05:59, 24 August 2009 (EDT)		****** Bump... --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 05:59, 24 August 2009 (EDT)
			******* I'll go ahead and delete it now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:39, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:59, 24 August 2009
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
	****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)		****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)
			*****Bump... --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 05:59, 24 August 2009 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:37, 4 July 2009
Line 4:		Line 4:
	*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)		*** Well, he hasn't panned out... is it delete time? --[[User:Radicell\|Radicell]] 09:49, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
	Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)		Methinks deletion is now good for this page. --[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 22:21, 17 May 2009 (EDT)
			****Agreed with deletion. I didnt even know this character (if you can call him that, lol) existed --[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 05:37, 4 July 2009 (EDT)