Talk:Green energy blast - Revision history

imported>MiamiVolts: fix power names template

2010-02-12T18:45:39Z

fix power names template

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:45, 12 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>MiamiVolts: fix power names template

2010-02-12T18:45:39Z

fix power names template

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:45, 12 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{power names\|3\|Oliver Grigbsy answered on Twitter that Ricky's ability could be referred to as a '''green energy blast'''}}
	{{power names\|6}}

	==Energy?==		==Energy?==

imported>Mc hammark: Talk:Ricky's ability moved to Talk:Green energy blast: As stated by Oliver Grigsby, writer of the ability, the ability is called Green energy blast

2010-02-12T17:16:23Z

Talk:Ricky's ability moved to Talk:Green energy blast: As stated by Oliver Grigsby, writer of the ability, the ability is called Green energy blast

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 12 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Oliver Grigsby says... */

2010-02-12T17:12:04Z

Oliver Grigsby says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:12, 12 February 2010
Line 63:		Line 63:
	**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	***Should we change it then? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:56, 12 February 2010 (EST)		***Should we change it then? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:56, 12 February 2010 (EST)
			*** Yes. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 12:12, 12 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Oliver Grigsby says... */

2010-02-12T16:56:33Z

Oliver Grigsby says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 12 February 2010
Line 62:		Line 62:
	****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			***Should we change it then? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:56, 12 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ricard Desi: /* Oliver Grigsby says... */

2010-02-08T22:03:25Z

Oliver Grigsby says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 8 February 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)

imported>PJDEP: /* Oliver Grigsby says... */

2010-02-08T21:42:37Z

Oliver Grigsby says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 8 February 2010
Line 60:		Line 60:
	*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Oliver Grigsby says... */

2010-02-08T21:34:51Z

Oliver Grigsby says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 8 February 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:
	**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts at 21:33, 8 February 2010

2010-02-08T21:33:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 8 February 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:
	*One question, do we have to take the writer's quote exactly and list the ability as "green energy blast", or can we drop the green?--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:26, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*One question, do we have to take the writer's quote exactly and list the ability as "green energy blast", or can we drop the green?--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:26, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Oliver Grigsby says... */

2010-02-08T21:29:27Z

Oliver Grigsby says...

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:29, 8 February 2010
Line 57:		Line 57:
	***[https://twitter.com/OliverGrigsby Here]. I'll tweet him about the others but I've no assurance that he will reply. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:18, 8 February 2010 (EST)		***[https://twitter.com/OliverGrigsby Here]. I'll tweet him about the others but I've no assurance that he will reply. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:18, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	*One question, do we have to take the writer's quote exactly and list the ability as "green energy blast", or can we drop the green?--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:26, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*One question, do we have to take the writer's quote exactly and list the ability as "green energy blast", or can we drop the green?--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:26, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:56, 12 February 2010
Line 62:		Line 62:
	****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			***Should we change it then? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 11:56, 12 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 8 February 2010
Line 61:		Line 61:
	****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			**Perhaps asking if it's the same as the [[future terrorist's ability]] would be a good idea too. --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:03, 8 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 8 February 2010
Line 60:		Line 60:
	*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)		****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			****Yes, I'm fine with "green energy blast".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:42, 8 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:34, 8 February 2010
Line 59:		Line 59:
	**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			****As long as its better than Ricky's ability, I'm happy. :) --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:34, 8 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 8 February 2010
Line 58:		Line 58:
	*One question, do we have to take the writer's quote exactly and list the ability as "green energy blast", or can we drop the green?--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:26, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*One question, do we have to take the writer's quote exactly and list the ability as "green energy blast", or can we drop the green?--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:26, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)		**I would just take the green as a description of the colour. It wouldn't be wrong to call it energy blast, unless there was another ability that was an energy blast but was red. In that case I think we might change it, but then again, that would be like the two different colours of pyrokinesis. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 16:29, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			*** Thanks, Mc hammark, that's pretty explicit and works for me. PJDEP, if we believe he is being sincere with us, then I think we need to respect that and use exactly what he has said. So, I think we can give it a day to see if anything else from an equal or higher-level source comes up tomorrow; but at this point, it looks to me like we'll be going with 'green energy blast'.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:33, 8 February 2010 (EST)