Talk:Hayden Panettiere - Revision history

imported>Repo777: /* What the? */

2008-10-17T07:33:52Z

What the?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 17 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Repo777: /* What the? */

2008-10-17T07:33:52Z

What the?

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:33, 17 October 2008
Line 25:		Line 25:

	I found [http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/285/haydeningymclassyq4.jpg this picture] in Beeman's latest blog. Is that a prosthetic leg? Or is that her real leg? Either way, that looks dang painful.--[[User:Avenger29\|Avenger]] 13:45, 3 November 2007 (EDT)		I found [http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/285/haydeningymclassyq4.jpg this picture] in Beeman's latest blog. Is that a prosthetic leg? Or is that her real leg? Either way, that looks dang painful.--[[User:Avenger29\|Avenger]] 13:45, 3 November 2007 (EDT)

			I just saw the commercial Hayden did on the 2008 presidential elections. Why do actors have to open their mouths and talk about politics? I don't care what you think. I watch(ed) the shows to see you act and entertain us. Once you start talking about politics all I see when I watch your shows is you spouting off about your political views. You're supposed to be an entertainer so entertain. Is it that hard? I just lost a lot of interest in the show Heroes.

	== Men's Vogue. ==		== Men's Vogue. ==

imported>Heroe: /* Men's Vogue. */

2008-01-28T04:34:43Z

Men's Vogue.

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:34, 28 January 2008
Line 31:		Line 31:

	Some image for an 18 year old girl, right? Kinda following the tracks of some other female stars who at the time were her age. Then again, for perverts it's great. FOR THE RECORD, I ONLY CHECK OUT NINJADUDE TO SEE WHAT CELEBRITIES ARE IDIOTS.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 01:03, 24 November 2007 (EST)		Some image for an 18 year old girl, right? Kinda following the tracks of some other female stars who at the time were her age. Then again, for perverts it's great. FOR THE RECORD, I ONLY CHECK OUT NINJADUDE TO SEE WHAT CELEBRITIES ARE IDIOTS.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 01:03, 24 November 2007 (EST)
			*Sure you do. ;) --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 23:34, 27 January 2008 (EST)

	* Some parts of the interview:		* Some parts of the interview:
	http://www.hollyscoop.com/hayden-panettiere/hayden-goes-sexy-for-mens-vogue_13556.aspx --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 01:07, 24 November 2007 (EST)		http://www.hollyscoop.com/hayden-panettiere/hayden-goes-sexy-for-mens-vogue_13556.aspx --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 01:07, 24 November 2007 (EST)
Line 39:		Line 39:
	*** Yikes. I just lost a ton of respect for her. I used to think she was a nice girl, but after reading that... Jeez. As a Heroes fan, I just became even more of an Elle fan, just hoping that she'll someday take Claire down. As a Kingdom Hearts fan... Hopefully Disney and Squeenix are seeing this and saying, "This isn't our image. We need a new Kairi.".--[[User:Avenger29\|Avenger]] 03:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)		*** Yikes. I just lost a ton of respect for her. I used to think she was a nice girl, but after reading that... Jeez. As a Heroes fan, I just became even more of an Elle fan, just hoping that she'll someday take Claire down. As a Kingdom Hearts fan... Hopefully Disney and Squeenix are seeing this and saying, "This isn't our image. We need a new Kairi.".--[[User:Avenger29\|Avenger]] 03:37, 24 November 2007 (EST)
	* http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4558896949136939656&hl=en Live action Hayden! --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 17:01, 26 November 2007 (EST)		* http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4558896949136939656&hl=en Live action Hayden! --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 17:01, 26 November 2007 (EST)
			*<pervert>Mmmmmmmmm</pervert> --{{User:Heroe/sig}} 23:34, 27 January 2008 (EST)

	== Paire all over again. ==		== Paire all over again. ==

imported>Hardvice: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-13T01:19:29Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:19, 13 January 2008
Line 64:		Line 64:
	*** I think we should use the Ali Larter one, haha. No, but seriously, I agree with Hardvice. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:21, 12 January 2008 (EST)		*** I think we should use the Ali Larter one, haha. No, but seriously, I agree with Hardvice. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:21, 12 January 2008 (EST)
	*** My god! The sarcasm meter is off the charts. But seriously if you care that much about not changing it, then I'm not going to bother arguing with you. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:12, 12 January 2008 (EST)		*** My god! The sarcasm meter is off the charts. But seriously if you care that much about not changing it, then I'm not going to bother arguing with you. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:12, 12 January 2008 (EST)
			**** While we're on the subject: I ''do'' think headshots are better in all cases (for one thing, they "read" better in the portals, where the image is quite small), and I'm glad to see some of the old ones (Noah, Sendhil, Adrian) are being revisited. When ''Heroes'' started, we didn't have a lot of options for images of some of the leads. Now, of course, we do. There's no excuse for not having decent quality color headshots of the principal cast these days. As for caring about changing it: changing it is fine. But it should be a change for the better. We shouldn't go from an easily-recognizable face shot to a barely-recognizable head-and-shoulders shot. With Hayden in particular, we have a lot of choices, but the shot we choose should illustrate her article well, be easily recognizable both on her page and in the portals, and fit nicely with the other images in the portal. Simple headshots do all that. Vampy photoshoot images don't. Not beating a dead horse--I just want to be clear on ''why'' it matters. The "best" image of Hayden (for whatever value of "best") might not be the best choice when you consider the image's function on the wiki.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 20:19, 12 January 2008 (EST)

imported>Seclusion: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-13T01:12:05Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 13 January 2008
Line 63:		Line 63:
	**If for some reason we ''need'' a new photo (and why? there are a ton of other cast members with far worse photos which have never been changed ... we're not Pictures-of-Hayden Wiki, after all), then if I had to sum up objections to lots of the photos in one go, it would be "age appropriate". Any picture in which she looks like herself (an 18 year old girl) is to be preferred to pictures in which she looks like someone else (a 38-year-old meth addict). The purpose of the image is to illustrate her article, not to provide fanboys something to fap to, after all, so an image that is recognizably her is to be preferred. That's why things like headshots and red carpet photos work well, and things like professional photo shoots don't. "Artistic" and "sexy" really take a back seat to "recognizable" when illustrating a biographical article. Slutty photoshoot images just show a poor taste level and aren't particularly illustrative. We wouldn't use [http://wetmen.provocateuse.com/show/milo_ventimiglia this photo] of Milo, or [http://a1.vox.com/6a00e398affe62000300e398b00bb10004-500pi this photo] of Ali, would we?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:25, 12 January 2008 (EST)		**If for some reason we ''need'' a new photo (and why? there are a ton of other cast members with far worse photos which have never been changed ... we're not Pictures-of-Hayden Wiki, after all), then if I had to sum up objections to lots of the photos in one go, it would be "age appropriate". Any picture in which she looks like herself (an 18 year old girl) is to be preferred to pictures in which she looks like someone else (a 38-year-old meth addict). The purpose of the image is to illustrate her article, not to provide fanboys something to fap to, after all, so an image that is recognizably her is to be preferred. That's why things like headshots and red carpet photos work well, and things like professional photo shoots don't. "Artistic" and "sexy" really take a back seat to "recognizable" when illustrating a biographical article. Slutty photoshoot images just show a poor taste level and aren't particularly illustrative. We wouldn't use [http://wetmen.provocateuse.com/show/milo_ventimiglia this photo] of Milo, or [http://a1.vox.com/6a00e398affe62000300e398b00bb10004-500pi this photo] of Ali, would we?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:25, 12 January 2008 (EST)
	*** I think we should use the Ali Larter one, haha. No, but seriously, I agree with Hardvice. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:21, 12 January 2008 (EST)		*** I think we should use the Ali Larter one, haha. No, but seriously, I agree with Hardvice. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:21, 12 January 2008 (EST)
			*** My god! The sarcasm meter is off the charts. But seriously if you care that much about not changing it, then I'm not going to bother arguing with you. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:12, 12 January 2008 (EST)

imported>DocM: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-13T00:21:37Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:21, 13 January 2008
Line 62:		Line 62:
	*** I disagree. Those 2 photos are kinda outdated which was one of the main reasons I uploaded a new one in the first place. If you desire, have a look at [http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/7360/391op2.jpg this one]. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 00:47, 12 January 2008 (EST)		*** I disagree. Those 2 photos are kinda outdated which was one of the main reasons I uploaded a new one in the first place. If you desire, have a look at [http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/7360/391op2.jpg this one]. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 00:47, 12 January 2008 (EST)
	**If for some reason we ''need'' a new photo (and why? there are a ton of other cast members with far worse photos which have never been changed ... we're not Pictures-of-Hayden Wiki, after all), then if I had to sum up objections to lots of the photos in one go, it would be "age appropriate". Any picture in which she looks like herself (an 18 year old girl) is to be preferred to pictures in which she looks like someone else (a 38-year-old meth addict). The purpose of the image is to illustrate her article, not to provide fanboys something to fap to, after all, so an image that is recognizably her is to be preferred. That's why things like headshots and red carpet photos work well, and things like professional photo shoots don't. "Artistic" and "sexy" really take a back seat to "recognizable" when illustrating a biographical article. Slutty photoshoot images just show a poor taste level and aren't particularly illustrative. We wouldn't use [http://wetmen.provocateuse.com/show/milo_ventimiglia this photo] of Milo, or [http://a1.vox.com/6a00e398affe62000300e398b00bb10004-500pi this photo] of Ali, would we?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:25, 12 January 2008 (EST)		**If for some reason we ''need'' a new photo (and why? there are a ton of other cast members with far worse photos which have never been changed ... we're not Pictures-of-Hayden Wiki, after all), then if I had to sum up objections to lots of the photos in one go, it would be "age appropriate". Any picture in which she looks like herself (an 18 year old girl) is to be preferred to pictures in which she looks like someone else (a 38-year-old meth addict). The purpose of the image is to illustrate her article, not to provide fanboys something to fap to, after all, so an image that is recognizably her is to be preferred. That's why things like headshots and red carpet photos work well, and things like professional photo shoots don't. "Artistic" and "sexy" really take a back seat to "recognizable" when illustrating a biographical article. Slutty photoshoot images just show a poor taste level and aren't particularly illustrative. We wouldn't use [http://wetmen.provocateuse.com/show/milo_ventimiglia this photo] of Milo, or [http://a1.vox.com/6a00e398affe62000300e398b00bb10004-500pi this photo] of Ali, would we?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:25, 12 January 2008 (EST)
			*** I think we should use the Ali Larter one, haha. No, but seriously, I agree with Hardvice. --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 19:21, 12 January 2008 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-12T23:25:20Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:25, 12 January 2008
Line 60:		Line 60:
	** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)		** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)
	** I don't think there's any reason to look for another image. We have two perfectly good headshots from which to choose. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:11, 11 January 2008 (EST)		** I don't think there's any reason to look for another image. We have two perfectly good headshots from which to choose. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:11, 11 January 2008 (EST)
	** I disagree. Those 2 photos are kinda outdated which was one of the main reasons I uploaded a new one in the first place. If you desire, have a look at [http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/7360/391op2.jpg this one]. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 00:47, 12 January 2008 (EST)		*** I disagree. Those 2 photos are kinda outdated which was one of the main reasons I uploaded a new one in the first place. If you desire, have a look at [http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/7360/391op2.jpg this one]. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 00:47, 12 January 2008 (EST)
			**If for some reason we ''need'' a new photo (and why? there are a ton of other cast members with far worse photos which have never been changed ... we're not Pictures-of-Hayden Wiki, after all), then if I had to sum up objections to lots of the photos in one go, it would be "age appropriate". Any picture in which she looks like herself (an 18 year old girl) is to be preferred to pictures in which she looks like someone else (a 38-year-old meth addict). The purpose of the image is to illustrate her article, not to provide fanboys something to fap to, after all, so an image that is recognizably her is to be preferred. That's why things like headshots and red carpet photos work well, and things like professional photo shoots don't. "Artistic" and "sexy" really take a back seat to "recognizable" when illustrating a biographical article. Slutty photoshoot images just show a poor taste level and aren't particularly illustrative. We wouldn't use [http://wetmen.provocateuse.com/show/milo_ventimiglia this photo] of Milo, or [http://a1.vox.com/6a00e398affe62000300e398b00bb10004-500pi this photo] of Ali, would we?--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:25, 12 January 2008 (EST)

imported>Seclusion: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-12T05:47:03Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:47, 12 January 2008
Line 60:		Line 60:
	** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)		** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)
	** I don't think there's any reason to look for another image. We have two perfectly good headshots from which to choose. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:11, 11 January 2008 (EST)		** I don't think there's any reason to look for another image. We have two perfectly good headshots from which to choose. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:11, 11 January 2008 (EST)
			** I disagree. Those 2 photos are kinda outdated which was one of the main reasons I uploaded a new one in the first place. If you desire, have a look at [http://img300.imageshack.us/img300/7360/391op2.jpg this one]. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 00:47, 12 January 2008 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-12T02:11:33Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:11, 12 January 2008
Line 59:		Line 59:
	*Ouch shot down hard. I am however quite curious to what I should be looking for. n.b not making her look like a whore. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:32, 11 January 2008 (EST)		*Ouch shot down hard. I am however quite curious to what I should be looking for. n.b not making her look like a whore. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:32, 11 January 2008 (EST)
	** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)		** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)
			** I don't think there's any reason to look for another image. We have two perfectly good headshots from which to choose. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:11, 11 January 2008 (EST)

imported>Lulu: /* New profile picture */

2008-01-12T01:50:56Z

New profile picture

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:50, 12 January 2008
Line 58:		Line 58:
	**** What's funny about Greg Grunberg's picture is it's actually a promotional image from ''Alias''. However, since his character was a government official, promo shots of him just look like regular headshots. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 11:29, 11 January 2008 (EST)		**** What's funny about Greg Grunberg's picture is it's actually a promotional image from ''Alias''. However, since his character was a government official, promo shots of him just look like regular headshots. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 11:29, 11 January 2008 (EST)
	*Ouch shot down hard. I am however quite curious to what I should be looking for. n.b not making her look like a whore. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:32, 11 January 2008 (EST)		*Ouch shot down hard. I am however quite curious to what I should be looking for. n.b not making her look like a whore. {{User:Seclusion/sig}} 20:32, 11 January 2008 (EST)
			** "Less is more" is a good phrase to consider. The main problem with the picture you uploaded was, in my opinion, that she was wearing far too much makeup. Plus, I think her having her hair down does her better justice. {{User:Lulu/sig}} 20:50, 11 January 2008 (EST)