Talk:Heroes Interactive:The Hard Part - Revision history

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Air Time? */ +note on links page

2007-05-23T21:21:03Z

Air Time?: +note on links page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 23 May 2007
(No difference)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Air Time? */ +note on links page

2007-05-23T21:21:03Z

Air Time?: +note on links page

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:21, 23 May 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	== Air Time? ==		== Air Time? ==
	Do we want to start noting from which airing the polling numbers come from, or start omitting them all together? I know we haven't noted the airing before, but couldn't the results differ the East Coast, West Coast and elsewhere airings?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 15:09, 15 May 2007 (EDT)		Do we want to start noting from which airing the polling numbers come from, or start omitting them all together? I know we haven't noted the airing before, but couldn't the results differ the East Coast, West Coast and elsewhere airings?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 15:09, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
			* No one's commented on this, so I'm just going to put a small note on the links page.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:21, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Air Time? */

2007-05-15T19:09:10Z

Air Time?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:09, 15 May 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	**** I love images, but these are less images and more information. I think a transcription would be fine. Searchable, too. We can use the images to do a complete transcript, and then probably delete the images. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:47, 15 May 2007 (EDT)		**** I love images, but these are less images and more information. I think a transcription would be fine. Searchable, too. We can use the images to do a complete transcript, and then probably delete the images. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:47, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
			== Air Time? ==
			Do we want to start noting from which airing the polling numbers come from, or start omitting them all together? I know we haven't noted the airing before, but couldn't the results differ the East Coast, West Coast and elsewhere airings?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 15:09, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Load Time */

2007-05-15T18:47:22Z

Load Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 15 May 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			**** I love images, but these are less images and more information. I think a transcription would be fine. Searchable, too. We can use the images to do a complete transcript, and then probably delete the images. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:47, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Admin: /* Load Time */

2007-05-15T18:42:07Z

Load Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 15 May 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)		** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
	*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))

imported>Admin: /* Load Time */

2007-05-15T18:36:57Z

Load Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 15 May 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)		** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
			*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))

imported>Alexwill: /* Load Time */

2007-05-15T18:32:20Z

Load Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 15 May 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Admin: /* Load Time */

2007-05-15T18:23:56Z

Load Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 15 May 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:

	* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))

imported>Admin: Load Time

2007-05-15T18:20:11Z

Load Time

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:20, 15 May 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	Does the question with the answer "liquid concrete" verify that the [[Company field leader]] is [[Thompson]]? I am assuming the bolded answer is the one revealed to be correct. If so, and if this stuff is considered canon, this would be evidence for merging those two articles. [[User:Gregorus\|Gregorus]] 14:59, 10 May 2007 (EDT)		Does the question with the answer "liquid concrete" verify that the [[Company field leader]] is [[Thompson]]? I am assuming the bolded answer is the one revealed to be correct. If so, and if this stuff is considered canon, this would be evidence for merging those two articles. [[User:Gregorus\|Gregorus]] 14:59, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
	*It's good enough for me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:09, 10 May 2007 (EDT)		*It's good enough for me. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:09, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

			== Load Time ==

			* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Discussion */

2007-05-12T01:05:43Z

Discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:05, 12 May 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	** Awesome. Now if someone has screencaps for HI from the previous two episodes we'd be back on track...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 7 May 2007 (EDT)		** Awesome. Now if someone has screencaps for HI from the previous two episodes we'd be back on track...--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 7 May 2007 (EDT)
	* Sorry I overwrote yours: I was typing it and you added it in at the same time. I have screen caps (more than 30) of the whole thing, and was thinking over posting images of the poll results instead of the approximate numbers... [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 19:23, 11 May 2007 (EDT)		* Sorry I overwrote yours: I was typing it and you added it in at the same time. I have screen caps (more than 30) of the whole thing, and was thinking over posting images of the poll results instead of the approximate numbers... [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 19:23, 11 May 2007 (EDT)
			** That's okay. My listing was far from complete. Do you have the previous two HI's recorded?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 21:05, 11 May 2007 (EDT)

	== Thompson ==		== Thompson ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:47, 15 May 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			**** I love images, but these are less images and more information. I think a transcription would be fine. Searchable, too. We can use the images to do a complete transcript, and then probably delete the images. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:47, 15 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:42, 15 May 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)		** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
	*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			*** However, if others think it would be really helpful to have them here as well, then as long as they're each under 25k I suppose it wouldn't hurt too much. However since we don't have them for previous episodes and since the information can be sufficiently transcribed, I'd still recommend we don't use them. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:42, 15 May 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:36, 15 May 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)		** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)
			*** They're very pretty and I think it was a good idea, but I think the transcription captures it sufficiently without spending a lot of bandwidth with the images and increasing the load time just to display some user voting statistics. I would leave the images out. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:36, 15 May 2007 (EDT))

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 15 May 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		* With all these high resolution images the page load time is drastically reduced. Since we also have the results transcribed I really recommend getting rid of the pictures. They look neat, but they're redundant and eat up bandwidth. Also not sure if they're covered by copyright or not, but since the results can be transcribed I'm not sure it can fall under fair use. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:20, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
	** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))		** I removed the images from the article for now. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:23, 15 May 2007 (EDT))
			** OK, good point. I had thought about that too: perhaps a more compressed format and more heavily cropped? I like the poll graphics because they're more accurate than the attempts to transcribe the results. [[User:Alexwill\|Alexwill]] 14:32, 15 May 2007 (EDT)