Talk:Heroism - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Villainy */ remove unwritten red link...we should probably use treachery instead

2008-01-12T22:42:45Z

Villainy: remove unwritten red link...we should probably use treachery instead

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 12 January 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Villainy */ remove unwritten red link...we should probably use treachery instead

2008-01-12T22:42:45Z

Villainy: remove unwritten red link...we should probably use treachery instead

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 12 January 2008
Line 60:		Line 60:

	==Villainy==		==Villainy==
	Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)		Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart Villainy page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)		*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)		**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)

imported>FrenchFlo: /* Villainy */ What's up villains ?

2007-12-23T19:59:03Z

Villainy: What's up villains ?

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:59, 23 December 2007
Line 64:		Line 64:
	**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)		**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)
	***I agree with Lost Soul. I think a villainy page would be nice. --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}}		***I agree with Lost Soul. I think a villainy page would be nice. --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}}
			****Just wanted to up this discussion so that we can figure what to do about that, if we don't do anything; then we should remove the red link from the intial post ;) --{{User:FrenchFlo/sig}} 14:59, 23 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ice Vision at 17:02, 22 December 2007

2007-12-22T17:02:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 22 December 2007
Line 60:		Line 60:

	==Villainy==		==Villainy==
	Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart ~~<font color=red>~~Villainy~~</font color>~~ page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)		Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)		*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)		**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)
			***I agree with Lost Soul. I think a villainy page would be nice. --{{User:Ice Vision/sig}}

imported>Lulu: /* Villainy */ rem red link

2007-12-22T01:46:49Z

Villainy: rem red link

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:46, 22 December 2007
Line 60:		Line 60:

	==Villainy==		==Villainy==
	Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)		Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart <font color=red>Villainy</font color> page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)		*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)		**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Lost Soul: /* Villainy */

2007-12-13T13:08:28Z

Villainy

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:08, 13 December 2007
Line 62:		Line 62:
	Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)		Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)		*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			**Treachery's different, imo; it refers to loyalty and betrayal, not necessarily "evil". I wouldn't be averse to a '''Crimes''' page, or something similar.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 08:08, 13 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Villainy */

2007-12-13T02:34:01Z

Villainy

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 13 December 2007
Line 61:		Line 61:
	==Villainy==		==Villainy==
	Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)		Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			*Sounds like a good idea...but don't we already have a page for [[Loyalty vs. treachery\|treachery]]? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:34, 12 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Tim Thomason: /* What's the difference between.... */

2007-12-13T01:14:32Z

What's the difference between....

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:14, 13 December 2007
Line 58:		Line 58:
	****are the same things going to be mentioned on both pages? because if so is there any point in having both pages to log the things? --{{User:Peterforpresident/sig}}		****are the same things going to be mentioned on both pages? because if so is there any point in having both pages to log the things? --{{User:Peterforpresident/sig}}
	*****Well, whatever the decision, '''someone''' needs to update noteworthy deeds...--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 04:05, 5 December 2007 (EST)		*****Well, whatever the decision, '''someone''' needs to update noteworthy deeds...--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 04:05, 5 December 2007 (EST)

			==Villainy==
			Given the next volumes assumed focus on "Villains," should we have a counterpart [[Villainy]] page? Something focusing on the evil acts done by people ([[Sylar]], [[Adam]], arguably [[Linderman]]) on the far side of the spectrum from [[heroism]] and [[moral ambiguity]]. I would be unable to write an appropriately complete page on the subject, but it may be something we need to think about before then.--[[User:Tim Thomason\|Tim Thomason]] 20:14, 12 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Lost Soul: /* What's the difference between.... */ someone needs to update "noteworthy deeds" section, or we could just scrap it

2007-12-05T09:05:35Z

What's the difference between....: someone needs to update "noteworthy deeds" section, or we could just scrap it

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 5 December 2007
Line 57:		Line 57:
	***But I don't know if it's needed... what does everyone else think?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 12:39, 15 November 2007 (EST)		***But I don't know if it's needed... what does everyone else think?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 12:39, 15 November 2007 (EST)
	****are the same things going to be mentioned on both pages? because if so is there any point in having both pages to log the things? --{{User:Peterforpresident/sig}}		****are the same things going to be mentioned on both pages? because if so is there any point in having both pages to log the things? --{{User:Peterforpresident/sig}}
			*****Well, whatever the decision, '''someone''' needs to update noteworthy deeds...--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 04:05, 5 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Peterforpresident: /* What's the difference between.... */

2007-11-15T17:43:43Z

What's the difference between....

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:43, 15 November 2007
Line 56:		Line 56:
	**Well if we're going to keep the two of them, we need more detail in the noteworthy deeds bit; so far we've only got up to ''{{ep\|114}}''.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 15:35, 9 November 2007 (EST)		**Well if we're going to keep the two of them, we need more detail in the noteworthy deeds bit; so far we've only got up to ''{{ep\|114}}''.--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 15:35, 9 November 2007 (EST)
	***But I don't know if it's needed... what does everyone else think?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 12:39, 15 November 2007 (EST)		***But I don't know if it's needed... what does everyone else think?--{{User:Lost Soul/sig}} 12:39, 15 November 2007 (EST)
			****are the same things going to be mentioned on both pages? because if so is there any point in having both pages to log the things? --{{User:Peterforpresident/sig}}