Talk:Hiro's blog - Revision history

imported>Mtundu: /* Hiro's blog is gone */

2009-01-13T06:26:45Z

Hiro's blog is gone

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 13 January 2009
(No difference)

imported>Mtundu: /* Hiro's blog is gone */

2009-01-13T06:26:45Z

Hiro's blog is gone

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:26, 13 January 2009
Line 290:		Line 290:
	== Hiro's blog is gone ==		== Hiro's blog is gone ==

	Hiro's blog has apparently been removed from NBC's website. Fortunately, many have done the work of cataloging his entries on this page. If anyone knows if the location of Hiro's blog has changed, help us out by posting the new address.--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 01:24, 13 January 2009 (EST)		Hiro's blog has apparently been removed from NBC's website. Fortunately, many have done the work of cataloging his entries on this page. As a latecomer to the Heroes fan base, this page has been the only way I have been able to read his entries. If anyone knows if the location of Hiro's blog has changed, help us out by posting the new address.--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 01:24, 13 January 2009 (EST)

imported>Mtundu: /* Hiro's blog is gone */ new section

2009-01-13T06:24:40Z

Hiro's blog is gone: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 13 January 2009
Line 287:		Line 287:
	******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
	********* I hate to think what we'd be discussing had the clue above been something like "do" or "eat".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		********* I hate to think what we'd be discussing had the clue above been something like "do" or "eat".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

			== Hiro's blog is gone ==

			Hiro's blog has apparently been removed from NBC's website. Fortunately, many have done the work of cataloging his entries on this page. If anyone knows if the location of Hiro's blog has changed, help us out by posting the new address.--[[User:Mtundu\|Mtundu]] 01:24, 13 January 2009 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* To Flowers SOLVED => DL! */ DL needs new clothes

2007-05-02T21:04:33Z

To Flowers SOLVED => DL!: DL needs new clothes

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:04, 2 May 2007
Line 228:		Line 228:
	**** I have actually never seen ''Lost'', and I have a slow internet connection so I probably couldn't keep up anyway. This puzzle is crazy, just think of what it would take to come up with a chess game that ended in [[DL]]. And who was crazy enough to solve it? -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 03:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		**** I have actually never seen ''Lost'', and I have a slow internet connection so I probably couldn't keep up anyway. This puzzle is crazy, just think of what it would take to come up with a chess game that ended in [[DL]]. And who was crazy enough to solve it? -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 03:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
	* So it was solved as DL. What does that mean...just a wild goose chase to find the letter DL, or is there a part that DL is playing that is important?--[[User:ASEO\|ASEO]] 16:47, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		* So it was solved as DL. What does that mean...just a wild goose chase to find the letter DL, or is there a part that DL is playing that is important?--[[User:ASEO\|ASEO]] 16:47, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
			** If you check the article, DLH is the e-mail to contact Hana. There's been an e-mail for each of the recent puzzles, except for ''For Fun'' puzzle, because Hiro has been forced into hiding. In the e-mail, we learn that Hiro suspects they have a traitor in their midst. And based on the episode [[Five Years Gone]], we can theorize that Hiro is telling Hana he suspects DL's new identity has been compromised and that she should tell him to get a new one (get ''new clothes'').--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:04, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

	==Last Puzzle==		==Last Puzzle==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Last Puzzle */ Posted

2007-05-02T20:53:25Z

Last Puzzle: Posted

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:53, 2 May 2007
Line 272:		Line 272:
	:::::::** So is there still not wanting to post at least the answer to the last puzzle? I get (from the lack of reply) that there is non-agreement about the means to the answer; but the answer is solid, isn't it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		:::::::** So is there still not wanting to post at least the answer to the last puzzle? I get (from the lack of reply) that there is non-agreement about the means to the answer; but the answer is solid, isn't it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	:::::::*** I think we may as well post it, since no good answer seems to be forthcoming, but we should make clear that the answer was guessed, and that "possible" solutions include the apologistic solutions. None of them really seems to account for everything, and none of them feels anywhere near as solid as the previous answers.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)		:::::::*** I think we may as well post it, since no good answer seems to be forthcoming, but we should make clear that the answer was guessed, and that "possible" solutions include the apologistic solutions. None of them really seems to account for everything, and none of them feels anywhere near as solid as the previous answers.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)
			:::::::**** Alright, I've posted my puzzle solution and noted that the answer was found originally by force. If someone finds a better solution, we can alter this laters.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:53, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

	=="For Fun" puzzle==		=="For Fun" puzzle==

imported>ASEO: /* To Flowers SOLVED => DL! */

2007-05-02T20:47:38Z

To Flowers SOLVED => DL!

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 2 May 2007
Line 227:		Line 227:
	***I agree Flo, however this one seems slower since there is approximately 1-2 revelations per week, as opposed to 1-2 revelations per day on TLE. Maybe TPTB are pacing themselves...[[User:Disney42\|Disney42]] 19:43, 2 April 2007 (EDT)		***I agree Flo, however this one seems slower since there is approximately 1-2 revelations per week, as opposed to 1-2 revelations per day on TLE. Maybe TPTB are pacing themselves...[[User:Disney42\|Disney42]] 19:43, 2 April 2007 (EDT)
	**** I have actually never seen ''Lost'', and I have a slow internet connection so I probably couldn't keep up anyway. This puzzle is crazy, just think of what it would take to come up with a chess game that ended in [[DL]]. And who was crazy enough to solve it? -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 03:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)		**** I have actually never seen ''Lost'', and I have a slow internet connection so I probably couldn't keep up anyway. This puzzle is crazy, just think of what it would take to come up with a chess game that ended in [[DL]]. And who was crazy enough to solve it? -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 03:13, 3 April 2007 (EDT)
			* So it was solved as DL. What does that mean...just a wild goose chase to find the letter DL, or is there a part that DL is playing that is important?--[[User:ASEO\|ASEO]] 16:47, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

	==Last Puzzle==		==Last Puzzle==

imported>Hardvice at 19:14, 2 May 2007

2007-05-02T19:14:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, 2 May 2007
Line 270:		Line 270:
	:::::::* The difference is that the blog entry I selected is not random, and it only has one row in which the word death is mentioned. As for choosing the words ''invisibility'' and ''familiar'', I can see how you might think that is forced. Though, these words are bound by the words 'to many', and 'too many' could mean 'fortune'. I'll think about it some more.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 13:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		:::::::* The difference is that the blog entry I selected is not random, and it only has one row in which the word death is mentioned. As for choosing the words ''invisibility'' and ''familiar'', I can see how you might think that is forced. Though, these words are bound by the words 'to many', and 'too many' could mean 'fortune'. I'll think about it some more.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 13:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
	:::::::** So is there still not wanting to post at least the answer to the last puzzle? I get (from the lack of reply) that there is non-agreement about the means to the answer; but the answer is solid, isn't it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		:::::::** So is there still not wanting to post at least the answer to the last puzzle? I get (from the lack of reply) that there is non-agreement about the means to the answer; but the answer is solid, isn't it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
			:::::::*** I think we may as well post it, since no good answer seems to be forthcoming, but we should make clear that the answer was guessed, and that "possible" solutions include the apologistic solutions. None of them really seems to account for everything, and none of them feels anywhere near as solid as the previous answers.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:14, 2 May 2007 (EDT)

	=="For Fun" puzzle==		=="For Fun" puzzle==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Last Puzzle */ Leave unanswered?

2007-05-02T03:30:20Z

Last Puzzle: Leave unanswered?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:30, 2 May 2007
Line 269:		Line 269:
	::::::: In the real world, Chairman Mao is the author of ''The Little Red Book''. This means that the email address we're looking for is the name of a red-headed person with whom Hiro had a ''major'' relationship. "Presently" refers to the birthday present Hiro gave her--the Japanese phrase book. A drum can refer to a large trash ''can''; Charlie was opening a ''can'' when she was killed by Sylar. A "desk" can be a counter where one goes to have questions answered or ask for information--a reference to Charlie's power.<br><br>It all fits, but that doesn't make it correct.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		::::::: In the real world, Chairman Mao is the author of ''The Little Red Book''. This means that the email address we're looking for is the name of a red-headed person with whom Hiro had a ''major'' relationship. "Presently" refers to the birthday present Hiro gave her--the Japanese phrase book. A drum can refer to a large trash ''can''; Charlie was opening a ''can'' when she was killed by Sylar. A "desk" can be a counter where one goes to have questions answered or ask for information--a reference to Charlie's power.<br><br>It all fits, but that doesn't make it correct.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 13:20, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
	:::::::* The difference is that the blog entry I selected is not random, and it only has one row in which the word death is mentioned. As for choosing the words ''invisibility'' and ''familiar'', I can see how you might think that is forced. Though, these words are bound by the words 'to many', and 'too many' could mean 'fortune'. I'll think about it some more.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 13:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		:::::::* The difference is that the blog entry I selected is not random, and it only has one row in which the word death is mentioned. As for choosing the words ''invisibility'' and ''familiar'', I can see how you might think that is forced. Though, these words are bound by the words 'to many', and 'too many' could mean 'fortune'. I'll think about it some more.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 13:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
			:::::::** So is there still not wanting to post at least the answer to the last puzzle? I get (from the lack of reply) that there is non-agreement about the means to the answer; but the answer is solid, isn't it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 23:30, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

	=="For Fun" puzzle==		=="For Fun" puzzle==

imported>Hardvice at 20:02, 26 April 2007

2007-04-26T20:02:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 26 April 2007
Line 281:		Line 281:
	******* So why's he telling it to Future Hana? It's not like present-day Peter is going to read the crossword puzzle, nor does Hana need to know the message, nor is she in any way capable of "getting" or "going to" Isaac herself, nor is there any context by which she can be made to understand that "When I say 'Get Isaac-san', I mean that that's a small part of the message I'm going to deliver to Peter Petrelli five years in the past", nor does she even know that he's going to deliver a message to Peter in the past until the next email. It's possible to make it a "message" that means something, but it takes a pretty huge leap of logic to do so. It just doesn't fit with the chronology of his messages, with his intended recipient's needs or present knowledge, or with the actual content of his message very well.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		******* So why's he telling it to Future Hana? It's not like present-day Peter is going to read the crossword puzzle, nor does Hana need to know the message, nor is she in any way capable of "getting" or "going to" Isaac herself, nor is there any context by which she can be made to understand that "When I say 'Get Isaac-san', I mean that that's a small part of the message I'm going to deliver to Peter Petrelli five years in the past", nor does she even know that he's going to deliver a message to Peter in the past until the next email. It's possible to make it a "message" that means something, but it takes a pretty huge leap of logic to do so. It just doesn't fit with the chronology of his messages, with his intended recipient's needs or present knowledge, or with the actual content of his message very well.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
	******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
			********* I hate to think what we'd be discussing had the clue above been something like "do" or "eat".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* "For Fun" puzzle */

2007-04-26T19:47:59Z

"For Fun" puzzle

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:47, 26 April 2007
Line 280:		Line 280:
	****** Not necessarily, but ''sometimes'' it does mean the same thing. And this time, it seems that way.		****** Not necessarily, but ''sometimes'' it does mean the same thing. And this time, it seems that way.
	******* So why's he telling it to Future Hana? It's not like present-day Peter is going to read the crossword puzzle, nor does Hana need to know the message, nor is she in any way capable of "getting" or "going to" Isaac herself, nor is there any context by which she can be made to understand that "When I say 'Get Isaac-san', I mean that that's a small part of the message I'm going to deliver to Peter Petrelli five years in the past", nor does she even know that he's going to deliver a message to Peter in the past until the next email. It's possible to make it a "message" that means something, but it takes a pretty huge leap of logic to do so. It just doesn't fit with the chronology of his messages, with his intended recipient's needs or present knowledge, or with the actual content of his message very well.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		******* So why's he telling it to Future Hana? It's not like present-day Peter is going to read the crossword puzzle, nor does Hana need to know the message, nor is she in any way capable of "getting" or "going to" Isaac herself, nor is there any context by which she can be made to understand that "When I say 'Get Isaac-san', I mean that that's a small part of the message I'm going to deliver to Peter Petrelli five years in the past", nor does she even know that he's going to deliver a message to Peter in the past until the next email. It's possible to make it a "message" that means something, but it takes a pretty huge leap of logic to do so. It just doesn't fit with the chronology of his messages, with his intended recipient's needs or present knowledge, or with the actual content of his message very well.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
			******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:02, 26 April 2007
Line 281:		Line 281:
	******* So why's he telling it to Future Hana? It's not like present-day Peter is going to read the crossword puzzle, nor does Hana need to know the message, nor is she in any way capable of "getting" or "going to" Isaac herself, nor is there any context by which she can be made to understand that "When I say 'Get Isaac-san', I mean that that's a small part of the message I'm going to deliver to Peter Petrelli five years in the past", nor does she even know that he's going to deliver a message to Peter in the past until the next email. It's possible to make it a "message" that means something, but it takes a pretty huge leap of logic to do so. It just doesn't fit with the chronology of his messages, with his intended recipient's needs or present knowledge, or with the actual content of his message very well.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		******* So why's he telling it to Future Hana? It's not like present-day Peter is going to read the crossword puzzle, nor does Hana need to know the message, nor is she in any way capable of "getting" or "going to" Isaac herself, nor is there any context by which she can be made to understand that "When I say 'Get Isaac-san', I mean that that's a small part of the message I'm going to deliver to Peter Petrelli five years in the past", nor does she even know that he's going to deliver a message to Peter in the past until the next email. It's possible to make it a "message" that means something, but it takes a pretty huge leap of logic to do so. It just doesn't fit with the chronology of his messages, with his intended recipient's needs or present knowledge, or with the actual content of his message very well.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:54, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
	******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)		******** I'm just afraid we're looking too deeply into something that's simply not there. — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 15:47, 26 April 2007 (EDT)
			********* I hate to think what we'd be discussing had the clue above been something like "do" or "eat".--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 16:02, 26 April 2007 (EDT)