Talk:Illusion - Revision history

imported>Mc hammark: /* Future Sylar */

2010-03-14T21:15:34Z

Future Sylar

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 14 March 2010
(No difference)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Future Sylar */

2010-03-14T21:15:34Z

Future Sylar

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 14 March 2010
Line 185:		Line 185:
	:From the FYG, Sylar said he met a special girl named Candice, who allowed him to become whoever he wanted, something of that effect. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:33, 14 March 2010 (EDT)		:From the FYG, Sylar said he met a special girl named Candice, who allowed him to become whoever he wanted, something of that effect. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:33, 14 March 2010 (EDT)
	* I believe there was an interview (maybe Behind the Eclipse?) where they confirmed that there were several hints placed throughout ''Five Years Gone'' to tip off the careful viewer that Sylar had gained the power of illusion from Candice. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:58, 14 March 2010 (EDT)		* I believe there was an interview (maybe Behind the Eclipse?) where they confirmed that there were several hints placed throughout ''Five Years Gone'' to tip off the careful viewer that Sylar had gained the power of illusion from Candice. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:58, 14 March 2010 (EDT)
			**Yeah, those tips were Sylar's saying it; plus Hiro asking for Candice, D.L, and Molly; then Sylar being able to find Peter, Hiro, Hiro and Ando, walk through walls and cast illusion; which implied he killed them all. --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 17:15, 14 March 2010 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Future Sylar */

2010-03-14T19:58:27Z

Future Sylar

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 14 March 2010
Line 184:		Line 184:
	Were is confirned who [[Sylar]] absorbed this ability from [[Candice]]? {{User:Tanderix/sign}} 09:03, 14 March 2010 (EDT)		Were is confirned who [[Sylar]] absorbed this ability from [[Candice]]? {{User:Tanderix/sign}} 09:03, 14 March 2010 (EDT)
	:From the FYG, Sylar said he met a special girl named Candice, who allowed him to become whoever he wanted, something of that effect. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:33, 14 March 2010 (EDT)		:From the FYG, Sylar said he met a special girl named Candice, who allowed him to become whoever he wanted, something of that effect. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:33, 14 March 2010 (EDT)
			* I believe there was an interview (maybe Behind the Eclipse?) where they confirmed that there were several hints placed throughout ''Five Years Gone'' to tip off the careful viewer that Sylar had gained the power of illusion from Candice. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 15:58, 14 March 2010 (EDT)

imported>Intuitive Empath at 16:33, 14 March 2010

2010-03-14T16:33:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, 14 March 2010
Line 183:		Line 183:

	Were is confirned who [[Sylar]] absorbed this ability from [[Candice]]? {{User:Tanderix/sign}} 09:03, 14 March 2010 (EDT)		Were is confirned who [[Sylar]] absorbed this ability from [[Candice]]? {{User:Tanderix/sign}} 09:03, 14 March 2010 (EDT)
			:From the FYG, Sylar said he met a special girl named Candice, who allowed him to become whoever he wanted, something of that effect. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 12:33, 14 March 2010 (EDT)

imported>Tanderix: /* Future Sylar */ new section

2010-03-14T13:03:38Z

Future Sylar: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 14 March 2010
Line 179:		Line 179:
	************I don't really have an issue with "illusion", I would just prefer "illusion creation". But, like I said, I don't care enough to argue about it. I will say however, that just because a name has been used for a long time shouldn't discourage renaming.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 17:05, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************I don't really have an issue with "illusion", I would just prefer "illusion creation". But, like I said, I don't care enough to argue about it. I will say however, that just because a name has been used for a long time shouldn't discourage renaming.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 17:05, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	************* You're right, but a name being used for a long time is usually a good sign that there's probably nothing wrong with it. Something about if ain't broke... :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:56, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************* You're right, but a name being used for a long time is usually a good sign that there's probably nothing wrong with it. Something about if ain't broke... :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:56, 20 February 2010 (EST)

			== Future Sylar ==

			Were is confirned who [[Sylar]] absorbed this ability from [[Candice]]? {{User:Tanderix/sign}} 09:03, 14 March 2010 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Illusion Casting */

2010-02-21T03:56:36Z

Illusion Casting

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:56, 21 February 2010
Line 178:		Line 178:
	************* Agreed. Someone having the "power of illusion" is common enough speech to be acceptable (in the same way one may have the "power of persuasion".) --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:00, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************* Agreed. Someone having the "power of illusion" is common enough speech to be acceptable (in the same way one may have the "power of persuasion".) --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:00, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	************I don't really have an issue with "illusion", I would just prefer "illusion creation". But, like I said, I don't care enough to argue about it. I will say however, that just because a name has been used for a long time shouldn't discourage renaming.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 17:05, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************I don't really have an issue with "illusion", I would just prefer "illusion creation". But, like I said, I don't care enough to argue about it. I will say however, that just because a name has been used for a long time shouldn't discourage renaming.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 17:05, 20 February 2010 (EST)
			************* You're right, but a name being used for a long time is usually a good sign that there's probably nothing wrong with it. Something about if ain't broke... :) -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:56, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>PJDEP: /* Illusion Casting */

2010-02-20T22:05:56Z

Illusion Casting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:05, 20 February 2010
Line 177:		Line 177:
	************ I think "illusion" is just fine. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:40, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************ I think "illusion" is just fine. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:40, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	************* Agreed. Someone having the "power of illusion" is common enough speech to be acceptable (in the same way one may have the "power of persuasion".) --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:00, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************* Agreed. Someone having the "power of illusion" is common enough speech to be acceptable (in the same way one may have the "power of persuasion".) --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:00, 20 February 2010 (EST)
			************I don't really have an issue with "illusion", I would just prefer "illusion creation". But, like I said, I don't care enough to argue about it. I will say however, that just because a name has been used for a long time shouldn't discourage renaming.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 17:05, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ricard Desi: /* Illusion Casting */

2010-02-20T22:00:47Z

Illusion Casting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 20 February 2010
Line 176:		Line 176:
	*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)		*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	************ I think "illusion" is just fine. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:40, 20 February 2010 (EST)		************ I think "illusion" is just fine. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:40, 20 February 2010 (EST)
			************* Agreed. Someone having the "power of illusion" is common enough speech to be acceptable (in the same way one may have the "power of persuasion".) --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 17:00, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Illusion Casting */

2010-02-20T21:40:09Z

Illusion Casting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:40, 20 February 2010
Line 175:		Line 175:
	**********Illusion projection.--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 12:04, 20 February 2010 (EST)		**********Illusion projection.--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 12:04, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)		*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)
			************ I think "illusion" is just fine. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:40, 20 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* Illusion Casting */

2010-02-20T21:14:38Z

Illusion Casting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 20 February 2010
Line 173:		Line 173:
	********I can remember it off the top of my head. ''"I create illusions. It's kinda my thing."'' --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 14:29, 20 February 2010 (EST)		********I can remember it off the top of my head. ''"I create illusions. It's kinda my thing."'' --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 14:29, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	*********Thanks (and nice memory). We could used "illusion creation" if we wanted to. It isn't on the top of my worry list so I'm not necessarily going to argue for it, but it does work.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 14:31, 20 February 2010 (EST)		*********Thanks (and nice memory). We could used "illusion creation" if we wanted to. It isn't on the top of my worry list so I'm not necessarily going to argue for it, but it does work.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 14:31, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	Illusion projection.--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 12:04, 20 February 2010 (EST)		**********Illusion projection.--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 12:04, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)		*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 20 February 2010
Line 173:		Line 173:
	********I can remember it off the top of my head. ''"I create illusions. It's kinda my thing."'' --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 14:29, 20 February 2010 (EST)		********I can remember it off the top of my head. ''"I create illusions. It's kinda my thing."'' --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 14:29, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	*********Thanks (and nice memory). We could used "illusion creation" if we wanted to. It isn't on the top of my worry list so I'm not necessarily going to argue for it, but it does work.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 14:31, 20 February 2010 (EST)		*********Thanks (and nice memory). We could used "illusion creation" if we wanted to. It isn't on the top of my worry list so I'm not necessarily going to argue for it, but it does work.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 14:31, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	Illusion projection.--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 12:04, 20 February 2010 (EST)		**********Illusion projection.--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 12:04, 20 February 2010 (EST)
	*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)		*********** Is another rename necessary? Especially one that's been established so long? Besides, "Illusion" is a common superpower name in fiction.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:14, 20 February 2010 (EST)