Talk:K Callan - Revision history

imported>PJDEP: /* Great job */

2010-02-09T21:14:43Z

Great job

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 9 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>PJDEP: /* Great job */

2010-02-09T21:14:43Z

Great job

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 9 February 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:

	She portrayed Charlie really well!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 9 February 2010 (EST)		She portrayed Charlie really well!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			*Accent and all.--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 16:14, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Yoshi n1: /* Great job */ new section

2010-02-09T21:05:45Z

Great job: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 9 February 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	*** Right. Plus, the page about Charlie is (mostly) about Charlie while she was younger, and her last name was still Andrews. We don't know if Charlie took her husband's last name or not, but we can assume she did. It's sort of like how [[Angela]]'s page is mostly about her when she was known as Angela Petrelli, and a little bit about when she was known as Angela Shaw. Either way, we just need to make sure we refer to older Charlie as just "Charlie", not "Charlie Andrews". Similarly [[Alexa Nikolas]]'s page should only refer to her character as "Angela" or "Angela Shaw"...which it doesn't, so I'll fix it now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:34, 9 February 2010 (EST)		*** Right. Plus, the page about Charlie is (mostly) about Charlie while she was younger, and her last name was still Andrews. We don't know if Charlie took her husband's last name or not, but we can assume she did. It's sort of like how [[Angela]]'s page is mostly about her when she was known as Angela Petrelli, and a little bit about when she was known as Angela Shaw. Either way, we just need to make sure we refer to older Charlie as just "Charlie", not "Charlie Andrews". Similarly [[Alexa Nikolas]]'s page should only refer to her character as "Angela" or "Angela Shaw"...which it doesn't, so I'll fix it now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:34, 9 February 2010 (EST)

			== Great job ==

			She portrayed Charlie really well!--{{User:Yoshi n1/sig1}} 16:05, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Charlie */

2010-02-09T05:34:37Z

Charlie

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 9 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	*** Right. Plus, the page about Charlie is (mostly) about Charlie while she was younger, and her last name was still Andrews. We don't know if Charlie took her husband's last name or not, but we can assume she did. It's sort of like how [[Angela]]'s page is mostly about her when she was known as Angela Petrelli, and a little bit about when she was known as Angela Shaw. Either way, we just need to make sure we refer to older Charlie as just "Charlie", not "Charlie Andrews". Similarly [[Alexa Nikolas]]'s page should only refer to her character as "Angela" or "Angela Shaw". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:34, 9 February 2010 (EST)		*** Right. Plus, the page about Charlie is (mostly) about Charlie while she was younger, and her last name was still Andrews. We don't know if Charlie took her husband's last name or not, but we can assume she did. It's sort of like how [[Angela]]'s page is mostly about her when she was known as Angela Petrelli, and a little bit about when she was known as Angela Shaw. Either way, we just need to make sure we refer to older Charlie as just "Charlie", not "Charlie Andrews". Similarly [[Alexa Nikolas]]'s page should only refer to her character as "Angela" or "Angela Shaw"...which it doesn't, so I'll fix it now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:34, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Charlie */

2010-02-09T05:34:18Z

Charlie

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 9 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			*** Right. Plus, the page about Charlie is (mostly) about Charlie while she was younger, and her last name was still Andrews. We don't know if Charlie took her husband's last name or not, but we can assume she did. It's sort of like how [[Angela]]'s page is mostly about her when she was known as Angela Petrelli, and a little bit about when she was known as Angela Shaw. Either way, we just need to make sure we refer to older Charlie as just "Charlie", not "Charlie Andrews". Similarly [[Alexa Nikolas]]'s page should only refer to her character as "Angela" or "Angela Shaw". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:34, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>PJDEP: /* Charlie */

2010-02-09T05:31:58Z

Charlie

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 9 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	**What we have now seems ~~find~~, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>PJDEP: /* Charlie */

2010-02-09T05:31:44Z

Charlie

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 9 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			**What we have now seems find, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>LeoChris: /* Charlie */

2010-02-09T05:29:33Z

Charlie

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:29, 9 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	It's important that we don't refer to K Callan's character as "Charlie Andrews". At the point that we meet K Callan's character, she has gotten married, and probably has taken her husband's last name. Therefore, she is still [[Charlie]], but her last name is unknown. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:36, 8 February 2010 (EST)		It's important that we don't refer to K Callan's character as "Charlie Andrews". At the point that we meet K Callan's character, she has gotten married, and probably has taken her husband's last name. Therefore, she is still [[Charlie]], but her last name is unknown. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:36, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ricard Desi: whoops, sig

2010-02-09T03:37:36Z

whoops, sig

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 9 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Charlie==		==Charlie==
	It's important that we don't refer to K Callan's character as "Charlie Andrews". At the point that we meet K Callan's character, she has gotten married, and probably has taken her husband's last name. Therefore, she is still [[Charlie]], but her last name is unknown. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:36, 8 February 2010 (EST)		It's important that we don't refer to K Callan's character as "Charlie Andrews". At the point that we meet K Callan's character, she has gotten married, and probably has taken her husband's last name. Therefore, she is still [[Charlie]], but her last name is unknown. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:36, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page?		*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ricard Desi at 03:37, 9 February 2010

2010-02-09T03:37:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:37, 9 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Charlie==		==Charlie==
	It's important that we don't refer to K Callan's character as "Charlie Andrews". At the point that we meet K Callan's character, she has gotten married, and probably has taken her husband's last name. Therefore, she is still [[Charlie]], but her last name is unknown. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:36, 8 February 2010 (EST)		It's important that we don't refer to K Callan's character as "Charlie Andrews". At the point that we meet K Callan's character, she has gotten married, and probably has taken her husband's last name. Therefore, she is still [[Charlie]], but her last name is unknown. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:36, 8 February 2010 (EST)
			*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page?

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 9 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)
	**What we have now seems ~~find~~, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**What we have now seems fine, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 9 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:
	*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)		*With this in mind, do we want to rename Charlie's page? --[[User:Ricard Desi\|Ricard Desi]] ([[User talk:Ricard Desi\|t]],[[Special:Contributions/Ricard Desi\|c]]) 22:37, 8 February 2010 (EST)
	**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)		**To what? Just Charlie? I think it would be best to simply note on the article that Andrews may (or may not) no longer be her last name and leave it at that, anything other than that is really speculation ... did ALL wives take their husband's name in 1944? Even then, Charlie was from the future and probably had a different mentality regarding the whole thing. --[[User:LeoChris\|LeoChris]] 00:29, 9 February 2010 (EST)
			**What we have now seems find, leave the article as "Charlie Andrews", but list K Callan as portraying just "Charlie".--[[User:PJDEP\|PJDEP]] - [[User Talk:PJDEP\|Need further explanation?]] 00:31, 9 February 2010 (EST)