Talk:Laser emission - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Eyebeams */

2015-10-12T12:31:15Z

Eyebeams

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 12 October 2015
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Eyebeams */

2015-10-12T12:31:15Z

Eyebeams

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:31, 12 October 2015
Line 83:		Line 83:
	== Eyebeams ==		== Eyebeams ==
	The page says that the lasers generated by this ability can be red or blue-coloured, and can be shot from the fingers or eyes. The thing is, [[Michael]] was the only character to have this ability, and as far as I can see, his lasers were exclusively blue and he never shot them from his eyes. So, where did the other info come from? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 03:16, 12 October 2015 (EDT)		The page says that the lasers generated by this ability can be red or blue-coloured, and can be shot from the fingers or eyes. The thing is, [[Michael]] was the only character to have this ability, and as far as I can see, his lasers were exclusively blue and he never shot them from his eyes. So, where did the other info come from? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 03:16, 12 October 2015 (EDT)
			* Somebody made it up back in May when not a lot of activity was happening on the wiki, so we missed it. I reverted it. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 08:31, 12 October 2015 (EDT)

imported>Kon at 07:16, 12 October 2015

2015-10-12T07:16:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:16, 12 October 2015
Line 80:		Line 80:
	# <s>--<small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:15, 21 October 2008 (EDT) In addition to MiamiVolts' point, anything other than "Lasers" would be doublespeak/redundant.</s>		# <s>--<small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:15, 21 October 2008 (EDT) In addition to MiamiVolts' point, anything other than "Lasers" would be doublespeak/redundant.</s>
	# or "laser" -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 17:11, 23 October 2008 (EDT)		# or "laser" -[[User:Level\|Lөv]][[User talk:Level\|ө]][[Special:Contributions/Level\|l]] 17:11, 23 October 2008 (EDT)

			== Eyebeams ==
			The page says that the lasers generated by this ability can be red or blue-coloured, and can be shot from the fingers or eyes. The thing is, [[Michael]] was the only character to have this ability, and as far as I can see, his lasers were exclusively blue and he never shot them from his eyes. So, where did the other info come from? -[[User:Kon\|Kon]] ([[User talk:Kon\|talk]]) 03:16, 12 October 2015 (EDT)

imported>Thrashmeister: /* Consensus check */

2009-02-16T23:51:57Z

Consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:51, 16 February 2009
Line 61:		Line 61:
	#--{{:User:UrNoob/sig}} if you went with the others, you would need to rename induced radioactivity to Nuking because of Ted's comment "I'm not gonna nuke the dog..." and lasing is gibberish. 23:16, 19 January 2009 (EST)		#--{{:User:UrNoob/sig}} if you went with the others, you would need to rename induced radioactivity to Nuking because of Ted's comment "I'm not gonna nuke the dog..." and lasing is gibberish. 23:16, 19 January 2009 (EST)
	#--[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 18:50, 16 February 2009 (EST) 'Lasers'? made of fail.		#--[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 18:50, 16 February 2009 (EST) 'Lasers'? made of fail.
			#*Just so you know, this consensus check is pretty much obsolete... {{User:Thrashmeister/Autosig}} 18:51, 16 February 2009 (EST)
	<br />		<br />
	Those in favor of '''laser generation''':		Those in favor of '''laser generation''':

imported>Lolwut: /* Consensus check */

2009-02-16T23:50:47Z

Consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:50, 16 February 2009
Line 60:		Line 60:
	#--[[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:10, 2 January 2009 (EST) Lightning was changed to "electric manipulation", laser emission is an accurate description and follows a similar pattern.		#--[[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:10, 2 January 2009 (EST) Lightning was changed to "electric manipulation", laser emission is an accurate description and follows a similar pattern.
	#--{{:User:UrNoob/sig}} if you went with the others, you would need to rename induced radioactivity to Nuking because of Ted's comment "I'm not gonna nuke the dog..." and lasing is gibberish. 23:16, 19 January 2009 (EST)		#--{{:User:UrNoob/sig}} if you went with the others, you would need to rename induced radioactivity to Nuking because of Ted's comment "I'm not gonna nuke the dog..." and lasing is gibberish. 23:16, 19 January 2009 (EST)
			#--[[User:Lolwut\|Lolwut]] 18:50, 16 February 2009 (EST) 'Lasers'? made of fail.
	<br />		<br />
	Those in favor of '''laser generation''':		Those in favor of '''laser generation''':

imported>UrNoob: /* Consensus check */

2009-01-20T04:16:55Z

Consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 20 January 2009
Line 59:		Line 59:
	#--[[User:WeatherWitch\|WeatherWitch]] 14:33, 2 January 2009 (EST) ''"Lasers" just sounds silly.''		#--[[User:WeatherWitch\|WeatherWitch]] 14:33, 2 January 2009 (EST) ''"Lasers" just sounds silly.''
	#--[[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:10, 2 January 2009 (EST) Lightning was changed to "electric manipulation", laser emission is an accurate description and follows a similar pattern.		#--[[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:10, 2 January 2009 (EST) Lightning was changed to "electric manipulation", laser emission is an accurate description and follows a similar pattern.
			#--{{:User:UrNoob/sig}} if you went with the others, you would need to rename induced radioactivity to Nuking because of Ted's comment "I'm not gonna nuke the dog..." and lasing is gibberish. 23:16, 19 January 2009 (EST)

	<br />		<br />
	Those in favor of '''laser generation''':		Those in favor of '''laser generation''':

imported>Intuitive Empath: /* Consensus check */

2009-01-02T20:10:11Z

Consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 2 January 2009
Line 58:		Line 58:
	#--[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 00:04, 18 December 2008 (EST)Much more professional sounding.		#--[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 00:04, 18 December 2008 (EST)Much more professional sounding.
	#--[[User:WeatherWitch\|WeatherWitch]] 14:33, 2 January 2009 (EST) ''"Lasers" just sounds silly.''		#--[[User:WeatherWitch\|WeatherWitch]] 14:33, 2 January 2009 (EST) ''"Lasers" just sounds silly.''
			#--[[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:10, 2 January 2009 (EST) Lightning was changed to "electric manipulation", laser emission is an accurate description and follows a similar pattern.

	<br />		<br />

imported>WeatherWitch: /* Consensus check */

2009-01-02T19:33:10Z

Consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:33, 2 January 2009
Line 57:		Line 57:
	#--[[User:Litox\|Litox]] 07:06, 19 November 2008 (EST) Better than the possible interpretation of the ability as '''ZOMFGLASERSPEWPEW'''.		#--[[User:Litox\|Litox]] 07:06, 19 November 2008 (EST) Better than the possible interpretation of the ability as '''ZOMFGLASERSPEWPEW'''.
	#--[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 00:04, 18 December 2008 (EST)Much more professional sounding.		#--[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 00:04, 18 December 2008 (EST)Much more professional sounding.
			#--[[User:WeatherWitch\|WeatherWitch]] 14:33, 2 January 2009 (EST) ''"Lasers" just sounds silly.''

	<br />		<br />

imported>Crazylicious: /* Consensus check */

2008-12-18T05:04:28Z

Consensus check

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 18 December 2008
Line 56:		Line 56:
	#--<small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 14:22, 15 November 2008 (EST) Changing my vote. "Laser" has passed into commonplace English as a stand-alone noun, and its status as an abbreviation is generally ignored... the redundancy in "laser emission" really is not that big of a deal.		#--<small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 14:22, 15 November 2008 (EST) Changing my vote. "Laser" has passed into commonplace English as a stand-alone noun, and its status as an abbreviation is generally ignored... the redundancy in "laser emission" really is not that big of a deal.
	#--[[User:Litox\|Litox]] 07:06, 19 November 2008 (EST) Better than the possible interpretation of the ability as '''ZOMFGLASERSPEWPEW'''.		#--[[User:Litox\|Litox]] 07:06, 19 November 2008 (EST) Better than the possible interpretation of the ability as '''ZOMFGLASERSPEWPEW'''.
			#--[[User:Crazylicious\|Crazylicious]] 00:04, 18 December 2008 (EST)Much more professional sounding.

	<br />		<br />

imported>Admin at 19:24, 9 December 2008

2008-12-09T19:24:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 9 December 2008
Line 68:		Line 68:
	#--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:52, 15 October 2008 (EDT) (since it was used in the novel and is already in noun form; "lasing" is a verb, not in line with "lightning", which is a noun; "laser emission" is double speak cause "emission" is in the acronym "laser")		#--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:52, 15 October 2008 (EDT) (since it was used in the novel and is already in noun form; "lasing" is a verb, not in line with "lightning", which is a noun; "laser emission" is double speak cause "emission" is in the acronym "laser")
	## I'll also add now that based on Admin's policy that explicitness trumps all for using the assignment tracker over a canon source, and since this was in essence explicitly called "lasers" in the novel, I think the policy suggests that the name needs to become "lasers".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:12, 9 December 2008 (EST)		## I'll also add now that based on Admin's policy that explicitness trumps all for using the assignment tracker over a canon source, and since this was in essence explicitly called "lasers" in the novel, I think the policy suggests that the name needs to become "lasers".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:12, 9 December 2008 (EST)
			##* If it is "in essence explicitly" then it's not explicit. Also the use of "lasers" in the graphic novel was not explicit. Explicit would be if they said "Your ability is named lasers." ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:24, 9 December 2008 (EST))
	#--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 01:16, 16 October 2008 (EDT) I disagree, it's very much like lightning, Peter called it "lightning" and Eric called it "Lasers", it's similar because that's what there were called in their specific canon source. Peter didn't call it "Lightner" and Eric didn't call it "Lasing." And if we go by what characters call it, regardless of how uncreative or unoriginal it is, then it should be Lasers.		#--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 01:16, 16 October 2008 (EDT) I disagree, it's very much like lightning, Peter called it "lightning" and Eric called it "Lasers", it's similar because that's what there were called in their specific canon source. Peter didn't call it "Lightner" and Eric didn't call it "Lasing." And if we go by what characters call it, regardless of how uncreative or unoriginal it is, then it should be Lasers.
	# --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:44, 16 October 2008 (EDT) In accordance with the Heroes Wiki ability naming conventions it ought to be called lasers since that is what it was called in the most recent GN.		# --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:44, 16 October 2008 (EDT) In accordance with the Heroes Wiki ability naming conventions it ought to be called lasers since that is what it was called in the most recent GN.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 9 December 2008
Line 68:		Line 68:
	#--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:52, 15 October 2008 (EDT) (since it was used in the novel and is already in noun form; "lasing" is a verb, not in line with "lightning", which is a noun; "laser emission" is double speak cause "emission" is in the acronym "laser")		#--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 17:52, 15 October 2008 (EDT) (since it was used in the novel and is already in noun form; "lasing" is a verb, not in line with "lightning", which is a noun; "laser emission" is double speak cause "emission" is in the acronym "laser")
	## I'll also add now that based on Admin's policy that explicitness trumps all for using the assignment tracker over a canon source, and since this was in essence explicitly called "lasers" in the novel, I think the policy suggests that the name needs to become "lasers".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:12, 9 December 2008 (EST)		## I'll also add now that based on Admin's policy that explicitness trumps all for using the assignment tracker over a canon source, and since this was in essence explicitly called "lasers" in the novel, I think the policy suggests that the name needs to become "lasers".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:12, 9 December 2008 (EST)
			##* If it is "in essence explicitly" then it's not explicit. Also the use of "lasers" in the graphic novel was not explicit. Explicit would be if they said "Your ability is named lasers." ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 14:24, 9 December 2008 (EST))
	#--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 01:16, 16 October 2008 (EDT) I disagree, it's very much like lightning, Peter called it "lightning" and Eric called it "Lasers", it's similar because that's what there were called in their specific canon source. Peter didn't call it "Lightner" and Eric didn't call it "Lasing." And if we go by what characters call it, regardless of how uncreative or unoriginal it is, then it should be Lasers.		#--[[User:Dman dustin\|Dman dustin]] 01:16, 16 October 2008 (EDT) I disagree, it's very much like lightning, Peter called it "lightning" and Eric called it "Lasers", it's similar because that's what there were called in their specific canon source. Peter didn't call it "Lightner" and Eric didn't call it "Lasing." And if we go by what characters call it, regardless of how uncreative or unoriginal it is, then it should be Lasers.
	# --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:44, 16 October 2008 (EDT) In accordance with the Heroes Wiki ability naming conventions it ought to be called lasers since that is what it was called in the most recent GN.		# --[[User:Pinkkeith\|Pinkkeith]] 11:44, 16 October 2008 (EDT) In accordance with the Heroes Wiki ability naming conventions it ought to be called lasers since that is what it was called in the most recent GN.