Talk:Linderman's prosecution - Revision history

imported>Hardvice at 19:53, 7 March 2007

2007-03-07T19:53:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 7 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Hardvice at 19:53, 7 March 2007

2007-03-07T19:53:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:53, 7 March 2007
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Help clear this up for me... So Nathan hasn't really been in Linderman's pocket this whole time -- he's actually been plotting to bring Linderman down. Is this an ongoing part of the prosecution, or something else? My gut says something else, but should it be mentioned on this page? If not, do we note it somewhere other than on character histories? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:26, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Help clear this up for me... So Nathan hasn't really been in Linderman's pocket this whole time -- he's actually been plotting to bring Linderman down. Is this an ongoing part of the prosecution, or something else? My gut says something else, but should it be mentioned on this page? If not, do we note it somewhere other than on character histories? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:26, 7 March 2007 (EST)
			* I'd say if they called in the FBI and flew to Vegas to catch him, it's something new. Nathan was a DA, not a federal prosecutor. Most racketeering is prosecuted under the federal RICO statutes, and the sting itself takes place in Nevada. Nevertheless, it feels like it should be mentioned here, though we should be clear that it's not the same case as the one the DA wanted Nathan to bring against Linderman.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 14:53, 7 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Continued prosecution

2007-03-07T19:26:41Z

Continued prosecution

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 7 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Isn't it already broken down by episode? It's only been mentioned in SMA so far.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:31, 19 December 2006 (EST)		Isn't it already broken down by episode? It's only been mentioned in SMA so far.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:31, 19 December 2006 (EST)
	: See, I told you it'd be easy to do ... No, I thought it was mentioned way earlier in the season (maybe ep 2 or 3??) but I must be wrong. My bad! - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:33, 19 December 2006 (EST)		: See, I told you it'd be easy to do ... No, I thought it was mentioned way earlier in the season (maybe ep 2 or 3??) but I must be wrong. My bad! - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:33, 19 December 2006 (EST)

			== Continued prosecution ==

			Help clear this up for me... So Nathan hasn't really been in Linderman's pocket this whole time -- he's actually been plotting to bring Linderman down. Is this an ongoing part of the prosecution, or something else? My gut says something else, but should it be mentioned on this page? If not, do we note it somewhere other than on character histories? — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 14:26, 7 March 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Stub */

2006-12-19T20:33:53Z

Stub

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 19 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Stub==		==Stub==
	Isn't it already broken down by episode? It's only been mentioned in SMA so far.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:31, 19 December 2006 (EST)		Isn't it already broken down by episode? It's only been mentioned in SMA so far.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 15:31, 19 December 2006 (EST)
			: See, I told you it'd be easy to do ... No, I thought it was mentioned way earlier in the season (maybe ep 2 or 3??) but I must be wrong. My bad! - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 15:33, 19 December 2006 (EST)

imported>Hardvice at 20:31, 19 December 2006

2006-12-19T20:31:07Z

New page

==Stub==
Isn't it already broken down by episode? It's only been mentioned in SMA so far.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 15:31, 19 December 2006 (EST)