Talk:Lisa - Revision history

imported>OmegaX123: /* Diabetes */

2007-05-12T19:42:56Z

Diabetes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 12 May 2007
(No difference)

imported>OmegaX123: /* Diabetes */

2007-05-12T19:42:56Z

Diabetes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 12 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*Diabetes can cause ''low'' sugars too, not just ''high''. And low sugars are juist as dangerous. My mother's a diabetic, so I know this so that I can take action if she crashes or whatever you call it. --[[User:OmegaX123\|OmegaX123]] 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)		Diabetes can cause ''low'' sugars too, not just ''high''. And low sugars are juist as dangerous. My mother's a diabetic, so I know this so that I can take action if she crashes or whatever you call it. --[[User:OmegaX123\|OmegaX123]] 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>OmegaX123: /* Diabetes */

2007-05-12T19:42:27Z

Diabetes

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 12 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
			*Diabetes can cause ''low'' sugars too, not just ''high''. And low sugars are juist as dangerous. My mother's a diabetic, so I know this so that I can take action if she crashes or whatever you call it. --[[User:OmegaX123\|OmegaX123]] 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

imported>Hardvice: /* Diabetes */

2007-04-01T02:35:45Z

Diabetes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 1 April 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
			*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Diabetes */

2007-04-01T02:34:03Z

Diabetes

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:34, 1 April 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
			*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Branfish: Diabetes

2007-03-31T22:53:04Z

Diabetes

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:53, 31 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)		: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)
	:: Good. Anyways, I verified and there is at no time mention of them being married in the episode in question. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:44, 10 January 2007 (EST)		:: Good. Anyways, I verified and there is at no time mention of them being married in the episode in question. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:44, 10 January 2007 (EST)

			== Diabetes ==

			"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Cuardin at 20:44, 10 January 2007

2007-01-10T20:44:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 10 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)		It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)
	: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)		: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)
	:: Good. Anyways, I verified and there is at no time mention of them being married in the episode in question.		:: Good. Anyways, I verified and there is at no time mention of them being married in the episode in question. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 15:44, 10 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Cuardin at 20:44, 10 January 2007

2007-01-10T20:44:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 10 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)		It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)
	: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)		: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)
			:: Good. Anyways, I verified and there is at no time mention of them being married in the episode in question.

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Hank and Lisas supposed merriage */

2007-01-09T23:39:50Z

Hank and Lisas supposed merriage

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:39, 9 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Hank and Lisas supposed merriage ==		== Hank and Lisas supposed merriage ==
	It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)		It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)
			: I'll just change it to "couple" instead of "married". That should take care of it either way. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 18:39, 9 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Cuardin at 23:37, 9 January 2007

2007-01-09T23:37:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:37, 9 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Hank and Lisas supposed merriage ==		== Hank and Lisas supposed merriage ==
	It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were?		It says it is not clear if Hank and Lisa are married. Is there any indication whatsoever to say that they are or ever were? I am gonna have to rewatch the dialogue to confirm, but I believe marriage is never mentioned at all. [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 18:37, 9 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 12 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*Diabetes can cause ''low'' sugars too, not just ''high''. And low sugars are juist as dangerous. My mother's a diabetic, so I know this so that I can take action if she crashes or whatever you call it. --[[User:OmegaX123\|OmegaX123]] 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)		Diabetes can cause ''low'' sugars too, not just ''high''. And low sugars are juist as dangerous. My mother's a diabetic, so I know this so that I can take action if she crashes or whatever you call it. --[[User:OmegaX123\|OmegaX123]] 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 12 May 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
			*Diabetes can cause ''low'' sugars too, not just ''high''. And low sugars are juist as dangerous. My mother's a diabetic, so I know this so that I can take action if she crashes or whatever you call it. --[[User:OmegaX123\|OmegaX123]] 15:42, 12 May 2007 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:35, 1 April 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		"Diabetic Lisa asks for and drinks a homemade (and presumably sugary) lemonade. It's unclear whether this was intended as a clue, was merely a gaffe, or whether she just plans to take an extra hit of insulin or glucophage later." ~ I'm not sure how relevent this is - Diabetes doesn't require the avoidance of sugar, just the regulation of its intake. A total lack of sugar is just as dangerous to a diabetic as an excess of it. --[[User:Branfish\|Branfish]] 18:53, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
	*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)		*That's why it's just a note. I find it interesting. But if you want to reword it, go ahead. :) — [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>RyanGibsonStewart</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|<font color=#0147FA>talk</font>]]) 22:34, 31 March 2007 (EDT)
			*I know for a fact that if I had a glass of lemonade, I'd be in for a world of hurt ... and my sugar byjeezus is very well managed.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 22:35, 31 March 2007 (EDT)