Talk:List of Articles related to Sylar - Revision history

imported>Ohmyn0 at 22:31, 26 March 2007

2007-03-26T22:31:30Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:31, 26 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Ohmyn0 at 22:31, 26 March 2007

2007-03-26T22:31:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 26 March 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)		******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	********* I've made it clearer in the [[Patient Zero]] article that what we have is effectively hearsay ... it's Mohinder reporting Chandra's beliefs. We can't know for sure that Chandra didn't later change his mind, or that he wasn't lying to Mohinder, or anything of the sort. All we know is that Mohidner believes that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:43, 8 January 2007 (EST)		********* I've made it clearer in the [[Patient Zero]] article that what we have is effectively hearsay ... it's Mohinder reporting Chandra's beliefs. We can't know for sure that Chandra didn't later change his mind, or that he wasn't lying to Mohinder, or anything of the sort. All we know is that Mohidner believes that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:43, 8 January 2007 (EST)

	== For the Elements Section ==

	<s>If a template exists, should we just put that in there instead?

	[[Template:Sylar]] would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes.</s> Nevermind, it would link back to itself. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

	==Eek==
	Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>FrenchFlo: Undo revision 49350 by Special:Contributions/FrenchFlo (User talk:FrenchFlo) misspage

2007-03-26T22:31:19Z

Undo revision 49350 by Special:Contributions/FrenchFlo (User talk:FrenchFlo) misspage

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 26 March 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Eek==		==Eek==
	Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)		Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

	==See Also==
	The See Also section doesn't appear to be corectly placed. The table must be broken. It needs repair! --[[User:FrenchFlo\|<span style="color:black; font-weight:bold;">FrenchFlo</span>]][[User talk:FrenchFlo\|<span style="color:grey; font-size: 8pt; font-weight:bold;">(talk)</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FrenchFlo\|<span style="color:grey; font-size: 8pt; font-weight:bold;">(contribs)</span>]] 18:30, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>FrenchFlo: ==See Also==

2007-03-26T22:30:26Z

==See Also==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 26 March 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Eek==		==Eek==
	Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)		Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

			==See Also==
			The See Also section doesn't appear to be corectly placed. The table must be broken. It needs repair! --[[User:FrenchFlo\|<span style="color:black; font-weight:bold;">FrenchFlo</span>]][[User talk:FrenchFlo\|<span style="color:grey; font-size: 8pt; font-weight:bold;">(talk)</span>]][[Special:Contributions/FrenchFlo\|<span style="color:grey; font-size: 8pt; font-weight:bold;">(contribs)</span>]] 18:30, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ohmyn0: Talk:Related Articles:Sylar moved to Talk:List of Articles related to Sylar: move back to list

2007-03-26T22:28:40Z

Talk:Related Articles:Sylar moved to Talk:List of Articles related to Sylar: move back to list

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:28, 26 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Hardvice at 22:26, 26 March 2007

2007-03-26T22:26:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 26 March 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	[[Template:Sylar]] would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes.</s> Nevermind, it would link back to itself. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)		[[Template:Sylar]] would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes.</s> Nevermind, it would link back to itself. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

			==Eek==
			Not a big fan of moving this one since it's the "list page" for the template. I'd rather have a redundant portal-style article and the list article, to be honest. It's more consistent with the other article series, not all of which are going to have Related Articles portals. At the very least, we should update the template to point to the proper page, but it seems like there's not a 100% match between the article series and the portal.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 18:26, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo: /* For the Elements Section */

2007-03-26T22:14:19Z

For the Elements Section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 26 March 2007
Line 14:		Line 14:
	== For the Elements Section ==		== For the Elements Section ==

	If a template exists, should we just put that in there instead?		<s>If a template exists, should we just put that in there instead?

	[[Template:Sylar]] would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)		[[Template:Sylar]] would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes.</s> Nevermind, it would link back to itself. --[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Baldbobbo: For the Elements Section

2007-03-26T22:11:44Z

For the Elements Section

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:11, 26 March 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)		******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	********* I've made it clearer in the [[Patient Zero]] article that what we have is effectively hearsay ... it's Mohinder reporting Chandra's beliefs. We can't know for sure that Chandra didn't later change his mind, or that he wasn't lying to Mohinder, or anything of the sort. All we know is that Mohidner believes that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:43, 8 January 2007 (EST)		********* I've made it clearer in the [[Patient Zero]] article that what we have is effectively hearsay ... it's Mohinder reporting Chandra's beliefs. We can't know for sure that Chandra didn't later change his mind, or that he wasn't lying to Mohinder, or anything of the sort. All we know is that Mohidner believes that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:43, 8 January 2007 (EST)

			== For the Elements Section ==

			If a template exists, should we just put that in there instead?

			[[Template:Sylar]] would look good in that section instead of 7+ big boxes.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 18:11, 26 March 2007 (EDT)

imported>Ohmyn0: Talk:List of articles related to Sylar moved to Talk:Related Articles:Sylar: just like Hiro's

2007-03-26T22:07:49Z

Talk:List of articles related to Sylar moved to Talk:Related Articles:Sylar: just like Hiro's

← Older revision	Revision as of 22:07, 26 March 2007
(No difference)

imported>Red: /* Sylar as Patient Zero */

2007-01-09T01:07:32Z

Sylar as Patient Zero

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 9 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	**** Well, it has to be from at least after Gabriel killed Brian Davis, because it refers to Sylar, not Gabriel Gray. But either way, something on the tape makes Mohinder say that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:22, 8 January 2007 (EST)		**** Well, it has to be from at least after Gabriel killed Brian Davis, because it refers to Sylar, not Gabriel Gray. But either way, something on the tape makes Mohinder say that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:22, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	**** And I for one have come to believe the whole "I'm close to discovering my Patient Zero" statement was just Chandra trying to distance Mohinder from his research again. He wanted to protect Mohinder from ridicule and ostracism, as we saw in 7MTM and Homecoming. Being purposefully vague about his research is just another way to do so.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:24, 8 January 2007 (EST)		**** And I for one have come to believe the whole "I'm close to discovering my Patient Zero" statement was just Chandra trying to distance Mohinder from his research again. He wanted to protect Mohinder from ridicule and ostracism, as we saw in 7MTM and Homecoming. Being purposefully vague about his research is just another way to do so.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:24, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	****** Again [[Mohinder]]'s statement maybe based on CS's old Notes. Also Brian Davis Also proves that he developed his powers earlier than [[Gabriel\|Gray]]'s, not to mention [[Claire]]'s and [[~~Isaac~~]]'s. <br>'''<span style="color:#FF0000">~ ~ ~ ~ [[User talk:Red\|Red]] =</SPAN> 01:28, 8 January 2007 (EST)		****** Again [[Mohinder]]'s statement maybe based on CS's old Notes. Also [[Brian Davis]] Also proves that he developed his powers earlier than [[Gabriel\|Gray]]'s, not to mention [[Claire]], [[Eden]], [[Haitian]], [[Hana]], [[Nathan]], [[Peter]] and [[Sanjog]]. <br>'''<span style="color:#FF0000">~ ~ ~ ~ [[User talk:Red\|Red]] =</SPAN> 01:28, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	******* But we have no idea what Chandra meant by Patient Zero. Mohinder says his father was close to finding "his" Patient Zero, not "the" patient zero. It's possible he merely meant his first evolved human ... which would be Gabriel Gray. All we know for sure, then, is that according to Mohinder, at some point, Chandra believed Sylar was "his" patient zero. That's all the article can positively state at this point.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:31, 8 January 2007 (EST)		******* But we have no idea what Chandra meant by Patient Zero. Mohinder says his father was close to finding "his" Patient Zero, not "the" patient zero. It's possible he merely meant his first evolved human ... which would be Gabriel Gray. All we know for sure, then, is that according to Mohinder, at some point, Chandra believed Sylar was "his" patient zero. That's all the article can positively state at this point.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:31, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)		******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 9 January 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:
	**** Well, it has to be from at least after Gabriel killed Brian Davis, because it refers to Sylar, not Gabriel Gray. But either way, something on the tape makes Mohinder say that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:22, 8 January 2007 (EST)		**** Well, it has to be from at least after Gabriel killed Brian Davis, because it refers to Sylar, not Gabriel Gray. But either way, something on the tape makes Mohinder say that Chandra believed Sylar was Patient Zero.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:22, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	**** And I for one have come to believe the whole "I'm close to discovering my Patient Zero" statement was just Chandra trying to distance Mohinder from his research again. He wanted to protect Mohinder from ridicule and ostracism, as we saw in 7MTM and Homecoming. Being purposefully vague about his research is just another way to do so.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:24, 8 January 2007 (EST)		**** And I for one have come to believe the whole "I'm close to discovering my Patient Zero" statement was just Chandra trying to distance Mohinder from his research again. He wanted to protect Mohinder from ridicule and ostracism, as we saw in 7MTM and Homecoming. Being purposefully vague about his research is just another way to do so.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:24, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	****** Again [[Mohinder]]'s statement maybe based on CS's old Notes. Also Brian Davis Also proves that he developed his powers earlier than [[Gabriel\|Gray]]'s, not to mention [[Claire]]'s and [[~~Isaac~~]]'s. <br>'''<span style="color:#FF0000">~ ~ ~ ~ [[User talk:Red\|Red]] =</SPAN> 01:28, 8 January 2007 (EST)		****** Again [[Mohinder]]'s statement maybe based on CS's old Notes. Also [[Brian Davis]] Also proves that he developed his powers earlier than [[Gabriel\|Gray]]'s, not to mention [[Claire]], [[Eden]], [[Haitian]], [[Hana]], [[Nathan]], [[Peter]] and [[Sanjog]]. <br>'''<span style="color:#FF0000">~ ~ ~ ~ [[User talk:Red\|Red]] =</SPAN> 01:28, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	******* But we have no idea what Chandra meant by Patient Zero. Mohinder says his father was close to finding "his" Patient Zero, not "the" patient zero. It's possible he merely meant his first evolved human ... which would be Gabriel Gray. All we know for sure, then, is that according to Mohinder, at some point, Chandra believed Sylar was "his" patient zero. That's all the article can positively state at this point.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:31, 8 January 2007 (EST)		******* But we have no idea what Chandra meant by Patient Zero. Mohinder says his father was close to finding "his" Patient Zero, not "the" patient zero. It's possible he merely meant his first evolved human ... which would be Gabriel Gray. All we know for sure, then, is that according to Mohinder, at some point, Chandra believed Sylar was "his" patient zero. That's all the article can positively state at this point.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 01:31, 8 January 2007 (EST)
	******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)		******** We need to remember that ''we're'' not trying to figure out who Patient Zero is. We're just reporting what Chandra believed. And that fact was pretty clearly stated by Mohinder, even if it is erroneous. - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 01:35, 8 January 2007 (EST)