Talk:Matthew Parkman, Jr. (explosion future) - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Latest power debate */

2010-02-22T17:14:43Z

Latest power debate

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:14, 22 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Latest power debate */

2010-02-22T17:14:43Z

Latest power debate

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:14, 22 February 2010
Line 44:		Line 44:
	Ok, so I originally removed the fact he had Activation and Deactivation, Wargrowlmon then pointed out that in the BTE (see page notes) the writers confirmed that it was the same baby and had the same power. The question is, do we take this as confirmation of his ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 09:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)		Ok, so I originally removed the fact he had Activation and Deactivation, Wargrowlmon then pointed out that in the BTE (see page notes) the writers confirmed that it was the same baby and had the same power. The question is, do we take this as confirmation of his ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 09:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)
	*Yes. BTE counts as confirmation of Matt Jr.'s ability. --'''[[User:Ricard Desi\|<font color=#609000>Ricard</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Ricard Desi\|<font color=#609000>Desi</font>]]''' 10:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)		*Yes. BTE counts as confirmation of Matt Jr.'s ability. --'''[[User:Ricard Desi\|<font color=#609000>Ricard</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Ricard Desi\|<font color=#609000>Desi</font>]]''' 10:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)
			** I think I may have also contributed to the reverts. I forgot about the BTE confirmation. I'll fix it now. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 12:14, 22 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ricard Desi: /* Latest power debate */

2010-02-22T15:03:32Z

Latest power debate

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:03, 22 February 2010
Line 43:		Line 43:

	Ok, so I originally removed the fact he had Activation and Deactivation, Wargrowlmon then pointed out that in the BTE (see page notes) the writers confirmed that it was the same baby and had the same power. The question is, do we take this as confirmation of his ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 09:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)		Ok, so I originally removed the fact he had Activation and Deactivation, Wargrowlmon then pointed out that in the BTE (see page notes) the writers confirmed that it was the same baby and had the same power. The question is, do we take this as confirmation of his ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 09:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)
			*Yes. BTE counts as confirmation of Matt Jr.'s ability. --'''[[User:Ricard Desi\|<font color=#609000>Ricard</font>]]''' '''[[User talk:Ricard Desi\|<font color=#609000>Desi</font>]]''' 10:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Mc hammark: /* Latest power debate */ new section

2010-02-22T14:03:17Z

Latest power debate: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 22 February 2010
Line 39:		Line 39:
	*** Oh, never mind. I see his name was updated. I'll move the page since it's confirmed now. That's really all we've ever been waiting on was confirmation that they're the same person. We now have that with [http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604 this week's BTE]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:22, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		*** Oh, never mind. I see his name was updated. I'll move the page since it's confirmed now. That's really all we've ever been waiting on was confirmation that they're the same person. We now have that with [http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604 this week's BTE]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:22, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
	**** The nickname Matt wasn't used in that future, similar to Sylar in the exposed future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:27, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		**** The nickname Matt wasn't used in that future, similar to Sylar in the exposed future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:27, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

			== Latest power debate ==

			Ok, so I originally removed the fact he had Activation and Deactivation, Wargrowlmon then pointed out that in the BTE (see page notes) the writers confirmed that it was the same baby and had the same power. The question is, do we take this as confirmation of his ability? --[[User:Mc hammark\|mc_hammark]] 09:03, 22 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Josh: Talk:Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future) moved to Talk:Matthew Parkman, Jr. (explosion future): no evidence he was called "Matt" in this future

2009-06-01T19:26:04Z

Talk:Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future) moved to Talk:Matthew Parkman, Jr. (explosion future): no evidence he was called "Matt" in this future

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:26, 1 June 2009
(No difference)

imported>Josh: /* Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)? */ comment

2009-03-30T23:27:02Z

Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)?: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:27, 30 March 2009
Line 38:		Line 38:
	** He was called Matthew. I don't mind updating the name of the character now. However, I'm not sure why this discussion about [[Matthew]] and [[Matt Parkman, Jr.]] is on the talk page for [[Matt Parkman]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:19, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		** He was called Matthew. I don't mind updating the name of the character now. However, I'm not sure why this discussion about [[Matthew]] and [[Matt Parkman, Jr.]] is on the talk page for [[Matt Parkman]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:19, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
	*** Oh, never mind. I see his name was updated. I'll move the page since it's confirmed now. That's really all we've ever been waiting on was confirmation that they're the same person. We now have that with [http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604 this week's BTE]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:22, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		*** Oh, never mind. I see his name was updated. I'll move the page since it's confirmed now. That's really all we've ever been waiting on was confirmation that they're the same person. We now have that with [http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604 this week's BTE]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:22, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
			**** The nickname Matt wasn't used in that future, similar to Sylar in the exposed future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:27, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Talk:Matthew Parkman moved to Talk:Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future): confirmed that Matt Jr is the same as Matthew from the future; see http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604

2009-03-30T23:22:57Z

Talk:Matthew Parkman moved to Talk:Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future): confirmed that Matt Jr is the same as Matthew from the future; see http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604

← Older revision	Revision as of 23:22, 30 March 2009
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)? */

2009-03-30T23:22:05Z

Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:22, 30 March 2009
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* We should go with what he was called in this future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:11, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		* We should go with what he was called in this future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:11, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
	** He was called Matthew. I don't mind updating the name of the character now. However, I'm not sure why this discussion about [[Matthew]] and [[Matt Parkman, Jr.]] is on the talk page for [[Matt Parkman]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:19, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		** He was called Matthew. I don't mind updating the name of the character now. However, I'm not sure why this discussion about [[Matthew]] and [[Matt Parkman, Jr.]] is on the talk page for [[Matt Parkman]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:19, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
			*** Oh, never mind. I see his name was updated. I'll move the page since it's confirmed now. That's really all we've ever been waiting on was confirmation that they're the same person. We now have that with [http://www.comicbookresources.com/?page=article&id=20604 this week's BTE]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:22, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)? */

2009-03-30T23:19:13Z

Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)?

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 30 March 2009
Line 36:		Line 36:
	Since we know it's the same character now, shouldn't he be moved to the usual future character nomenclature? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:47, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		Since we know it's the same character now, shouldn't he be moved to the usual future character nomenclature? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:47, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
	* We should go with what he was called in this future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:11, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		* We should go with what he was called in this future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:11, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
			** He was called Matthew. I don't mind updating the name of the character now. However, I'm not sure why this discussion about [[Matthew]] and [[Matt Parkman, Jr.]] is on the talk page for [[Matt Parkman]]. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:19, 30 March 2009 (EDT)

imported>Josh: /* Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)? */ comment

2009-03-30T23:11:23Z

Matt Parkman, Jr. (explosion future)?: comment

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:11, 30 March 2009
Line 35:		Line 35:

	Since we know it's the same character now, shouldn't he be moved to the usual future character nomenclature? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:47, 30 March 2009 (EDT)		Since we know it's the same character now, shouldn't he be moved to the usual future character nomenclature? [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 18:47, 30 March 2009 (EDT)
			* We should go with what he was called in this future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 19:11, 30 March 2009 (EDT)