Talk:Monica Dawson - Revision history

imported>Iheartheroes: /* Ice Queen, Part 1 summary */

2015-08-23T18:48:26Z

Ice Queen, Part 1 summary

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:48, 23 August 2015
(No difference)

imported>Iheartheroes: /* Ice Queen, Part 1 summary */

2015-08-23T18:48:26Z

Ice Queen, Part 1 summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 23 August 2015
Line 162:		Line 162:
	*How is that? {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 08:51, 23 August 2015 (EDT)		*How is that? {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 08:51, 23 August 2015 (EDT)
	** I think it was the double "that" which was throwing me off. "...that he has them that can keep..." I changed it slightly after rereading the novel (thanks for the talarino tip!) to clarify it. Thanks! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)		** I think it was the double "that" which was throwing me off. "...that he has them that can keep..." I changed it slightly after rereading the novel (thanks for the talarino tip!) to clarify it. Thanks! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
			*** You're welcome! {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 14:48, 23 August 2015 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Ice Queen, Part 1 summary */

2015-08-23T18:32:00Z

Ice Queen, Part 1 summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:32, 23 August 2015
Line 161:		Line 161:
	There's something wrong with the summary for ''Ice Queen, Part 1''. It says, "Micah tells Tracy that he has Monica and Rebellion that can handle the heat from the government if Tracy does not think she can handle it.". Either the grammar is off or the content is off, but I don't have access to reread the graphic novel so I can't tell. Anybody able to fix it? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:48, 22 August 2015 (EDT)		There's something wrong with the summary for ''Ice Queen, Part 1''. It says, "Micah tells Tracy that he has Monica and Rebellion that can handle the heat from the government if Tracy does not think she can handle it.". Either the grammar is off or the content is off, but I don't have access to reread the graphic novel so I can't tell. Anybody able to fix it? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:48, 22 August 2015 (EDT)
	*How is that? {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 08:51, 23 August 2015 (EDT)		*How is that? {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 08:51, 23 August 2015 (EDT)
			** I think it was the double "that" which was throwing me off. "...that he has them that can keep..." I changed it slightly after rereading the novel (thanks for the talarino tip!) to clarify it. Thanks! -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 18:31, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

imported>Iheartheroes: /* Ice Queen, Part 1 summary */

2015-08-23T12:51:01Z

Ice Queen, Part 1 summary

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:51, 23 August 2015
Line 160:		Line 160:

	There's something wrong with the summary for ''Ice Queen, Part 1''. It says, "Micah tells Tracy that he has Monica and Rebellion that can handle the heat from the government if Tracy does not think she can handle it.". Either the grammar is off or the content is off, but I don't have access to reread the graphic novel so I can't tell. Anybody able to fix it? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:48, 22 August 2015 (EDT)		There's something wrong with the summary for ''Ice Queen, Part 1''. It says, "Micah tells Tracy that he has Monica and Rebellion that can handle the heat from the government if Tracy does not think she can handle it.". Either the grammar is off or the content is off, but I don't have access to reread the graphic novel so I can't tell. Anybody able to fix it? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:48, 22 August 2015 (EDT)
			*How is that? {{User:Iheartheroes/sig}} 08:51, 23 August 2015 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Ice Queen, Part 1 summary */ new section

2015-08-23T03:48:29Z

Ice Queen, Part 1 summary: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 23 August 2015
Line 156:		Line 156:

	The actress who plays Monica, Dana Davis, is on a new show on ABC Family, a remake of the movie "10 Things I Hate About You" does anyone else think this means she has moved on from Heroes and wont be back? I would bring up the Lisa Lackey (Janice) example of coming back after so long, but she wasn't doing much else... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 13:29, 25 June 2009 (EDT)		The actress who plays Monica, Dana Davis, is on a new show on ABC Family, a remake of the movie "10 Things I Hate About You" does anyone else think this means she has moved on from Heroes and wont be back? I would bring up the Lisa Lackey (Janice) example of coming back after so long, but she wasn't doing much else... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 13:29, 25 June 2009 (EDT)

			== ''Ice Queen, Part 1'' summary ==

			There's something wrong with the summary for ''Ice Queen, Part 1''. It says, "Micah tells Tracy that he has Monica and Rebellion that can handle the heat from the government if Tracy does not think she can handle it.". Either the grammar is off or the content is off, but I don't have access to reread the graphic novel so I can't tell. Anybody able to fix it? -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 23:48, 22 August 2015 (EDT)

imported>Skullman1392: /* Not Coming Back? */ new section

2009-06-25T17:29:48Z

Not Coming Back?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 25 June 2009
Line 155:		Line 155:
	== Not Coming Back? ==		== Not Coming Back? ==

	The actress who plays Monica, Dana Davis, is on a new show on ABC Family, a remake of the movie "10 Things I Hate About You" does anyone else think this means she has moved on from Heroes and wont be back? I would bring up the Lisa Lackey (~~Jancie~~) example of coming back after so long, but she wasn't doing much else... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 13:29, 25 June 2009 (EDT)		The actress who plays Monica, Dana Davis, is on a new show on ABC Family, a remake of the movie "10 Things I Hate About You" does anyone else think this means she has moved on from Heroes and wont be back? I would bring up the Lisa Lackey (Janice) example of coming back after so long, but she wasn't doing much else... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 13:29, 25 June 2009 (EDT)

imported>Skullman1392: /* Not Coming Back? */ new section

2009-06-25T17:29:01Z

Not Coming Back?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 25 June 2009
Line 152:		Line 152:
	ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned. -- [[User:Earl\|Earl]]		ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned. -- [[User:Earl\|Earl]]
	* I might be wrong, but I don't believe that a cousin's wife's sisters have any official relation to you. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:36, 22 April 2009 (EDT)		* I might be wrong, but I don't believe that a cousin's wife's sisters have any official relation to you. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:36, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

			== Not Coming Back? ==

			The actress who plays Monica, Dana Davis, is on a new show on ABC Family, a remake of the movie "10 Things I Hate About You" does anyone else think this means she has moved on from Heroes and wont be back? I would bring up the Lisa Lackey (Jancie) example of coming back after so long, but she wasn't doing much else... --[[User:Skullman1392\|Skullman1392]] 13:29, 25 June 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Barbara and Tracy */

2009-04-22T23:36:47Z

Barbara and Tracy

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:36, 22 April 2009
Line 151:		Line 151:
	==Barbara and Tracy==		==Barbara and Tracy==
	ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned. -- [[User:Earl\|Earl]]		ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned. -- [[User:Earl\|Earl]]
			* I might be wrong, but I don't believe that a cousin's wife's sisters have any official relation to you. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 19:36, 22 April 2009 (EDT)

imported>Laughingdevilboy: /* Barbara and Tracy */ signed

2009-04-22T20:29:23Z

Barbara and Tracy: signed

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:29, 22 April 2009
Line 150:		Line 150:

	==Barbara and Tracy==		==Barbara and Tracy==
	ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned.		ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned. -- [[User:Earl\|Earl]]

imported>Intuitive Empath: new topics go in the bottom

2009-04-22T20:27:00Z

new topics go in the bottom

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:27, 22 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
⚫	==Barbara and Tracy===
⚫	ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned.
	==Notes for spoilers==		==Notes for spoilers==
	I couldn't find specifically the articles that mentioned her from the [[Spoiler:Season Two]] article, so if anyone can, feel free to put them in the Notes section.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 15:20, 17 August 2007 (EDT)		I couldn't find specifically the articles that mentioned her from the [[Spoiler:Season Two]] article, so if anyone can, feel free to put them in the Notes section.--[[User:Baldbobbo\|Bob]] 15:20, 17 August 2007 (EDT)
Line 150:		Line 148:
	hopefully monica would return , she is girl with pontential ! she fits perfectly in heroes because her power is not over top like time travel or super strength but is also usefully for fighting bad guys in her own way, was'nt she going to fight knox?		hopefully monica would return , she is girl with pontential ! she fits perfectly in heroes because her power is not over top like time travel or super strength but is also usefully for fighting bad guys in her own way, was'nt she going to fight knox?
	--[[User:Zoga78\|Zoga78]] 17:07, 6 March 2009 (EST)		--[[User:Zoga78\|Zoga78]] 17:07, 6 March 2009 (EST)

		⚫	==Barbara and Tracy==
		⚫	ok I added Barbara and Tracy to her reletives and now they're gone. I mean they are related by marriage right? I just think that they should be mentioned.