Talk:Peter Petrelli (exposed future) - Revision history

imported>Daevon: clairsentience

2009-12-15T12:44:12Z

clairsentience

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 15 December 2009
(No difference)

imported>Daevon: clairsentience

2009-12-15T12:44:12Z

clairsentience

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:44, 15 December 2009
Line 124:		Line 124:
	*This page is for two Future Peters, the one that changed the future, and the one from the new future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 02:32, 15 December 2009 (EST)		*This page is for two Future Peters, the one that changed the future, and the one from the new future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 02:32, 15 December 2009 (EST)
	** I thought Future Peter was exposed to Sylar's clairsentience when he returned to Level 5 and saw that everyone escaped. He saw Sylar in Jesse's cell. No? {{User:Altes/Signature}}		** I thought Future Peter was exposed to Sylar's clairsentience when he returned to Level 5 and saw that everyone escaped. He saw Sylar in Jesse's cell. No? {{User:Altes/Signature}}
			*** o yeah, you're right.[[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 07:44, 15 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Altes: /* Clairsentience */

2009-12-15T08:51:49Z

Clairsentience

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 15 December 2009
Line 123:		Line 123:
	How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)		How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)
	*This page is for two Future Peters, the one that changed the future, and the one from the new future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 02:32, 15 December 2009 (EST)		*This page is for two Future Peters, the one that changed the future, and the one from the new future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 02:32, 15 December 2009 (EST)
			** I thought Future Peter was exposed to Sylar's clairsentience when he returned to Level 5 and saw that everyone escaped. He saw Sylar in Jesse's cell. No? {{User:Altes/Signature}}

imported>Josh: /* Clairsentience */

2009-12-15T07:32:02Z

Clairsentience

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:32, 15 December 2009
Line 122:		Line 122:
	== Clairsentience ==		== Clairsentience ==
	How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)		How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)
			*This page is for two Future Peters, the one that changed the future, and the one from the new future. - [[User:Josh\|Josh]] ([[User talk:Josh\|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Josh\|contribs]]) 02:32, 15 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Daevon: Clairsentience

2009-12-15T04:39:57Z

Clairsentience

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 15 December 2009
Line 120:		Line 120:
	This Peter came from 2011, four years in the future. By the time, as stated in ''[[Resistance]]'', he killed hundreds of people. Then he suddenly thought, "Why don't I just go to the past and prevent all the deaths caused by Pinehearst and me?", time traveled and shot Nathan, hid the present-day Peter, sent Matt to Africa, but still screwed up: he did nothing to protect the formula. Moron. Your thoughts? {{User:Altes/Signature}}		This Peter came from 2011, four years in the future. By the time, as stated in ''[[Resistance]]'', he killed hundreds of people. Then he suddenly thought, "Why don't I just go to the past and prevent all the deaths caused by Pinehearst and me?", time traveled and shot Nathan, hid the present-day Peter, sent Matt to Africa, but still screwed up: he did nothing to protect the formula. Moron. Your thoughts? {{User:Altes/Signature}}

	=Clairsentience==		== Clairsentience ==
	How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)		How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Daevon: Clairsentience

2009-12-15T04:39:00Z

Clairsentience

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:39, 15 December 2009
Line 119:		Line 119:
	== Brainless butcher ==		== Brainless butcher ==
	This Peter came from 2011, four years in the future. By the time, as stated in ''[[Resistance]]'', he killed hundreds of people. Then he suddenly thought, "Why don't I just go to the past and prevent all the deaths caused by Pinehearst and me?", time traveled and shot Nathan, hid the present-day Peter, sent Matt to Africa, but still screwed up: he did nothing to protect the formula. Moron. Your thoughts? {{User:Altes/Signature}}		This Peter came from 2011, four years in the future. By the time, as stated in ''[[Resistance]]'', he killed hundreds of people. Then he suddenly thought, "Why don't I just go to the past and prevent all the deaths caused by Pinehearst and me?", time traveled and shot Nathan, hid the present-day Peter, sent Matt to Africa, but still screwed up: he did nothing to protect the formula. Moron. Your thoughts? {{User:Altes/Signature}}

			=Clairsentience==
			How was future peter exposed to clairsentience if sylar only got it due to him time travelling back in time. [[User:Daevon\|daevon]] 23:39, 14 December 2009 (EST)

imported>Kyle Stevens: /* Illusion */

2009-08-17T00:31:41Z

Illusion

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:31, 17 August 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I think it's [[illusion]].--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 11:23, 13 June 2009 (EDT)		I think it's [[illusion]].--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 11:23, 13 June 2009 (EDT)

			To what Thrashmeister said: Peter could have illusion but he could either have a different version (i.e. without ripples like Candice) OR his illusion could be more advanced to the point where there are no ripples. By more advanced, I mean he could have practiced perfecting the illusion.
			[[User:Kyle Stevens\|Kyle Stevens]] 20:31, 16 August 2009 (EDT)

	==Change Name==		==Change Name==

imported>Altes: /* Brainless butcher */

2009-08-09T09:31:06Z

Brainless butcher

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 9 August 2009
Line 113:		Line 113:
	* Agreed, now that we've seen that shape shifting can, too, change clothes, it could be shape shifting as much as illusion... -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 05:05, 3 May 2009 (EDT)		* Agreed, now that we've seen that shape shifting can, too, change clothes, it could be shape shifting as much as illusion... -- [[User:Altes\|Altes]] 05:05, 3 May 2009 (EDT)
	**The smoothness still makes me believe that it's illusion, also, BTE confirmed that the writers never intended shapeshifing to affect clothes, the people who worked in the episode were the ones who pushed it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:35, 3 May 2009 (EDT)		**The smoothness still makes me believe that it's illusion, also, BTE confirmed that the writers never intended shapeshifing to affect clothes, the people who worked in the episode were the ones who pushed it. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 16:35, 3 May 2009 (EDT)

			== Brainless butcher ==
			This Peter came from 2011, four years in the future. By the time, as stated in ''[[Resistance]]'', he killed hundreds of people. Then he suddenly thought, "Why don't I just go to the past and prevent all the deaths caused by Pinehearst and me?", time traveled and shot Nathan, hid the present-day Peter, sent Matt to Africa, but still screwed up: he did nothing to protect the formula. Moron. Your thoughts? {{User:Altes/Signature}}

imported>ERROR: /* Illusion */

2009-06-13T15:23:22Z

Illusion

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 13 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Illusion===		==Illusion==
	I think Illusion may be speculative. Yes, he is transforming into his past self, but his past self is also nowhere to be found but in the body of another man. I think we may be seeing a new power, but I don't know what it is, something to the effect of stealing a body. This is also speculation, of course. --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:16, 23 September 2008 (EDT)		I think Illusion may be speculative. Yes, he is transforming into his past self, but his past self is also nowhere to be found but in the body of another man. I think we may be seeing a new power, but I don't know what it is, something to the effect of stealing a body. This is also speculation, of course. --[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 16:16, 23 September 2008 (EDT)
	* All things considered (including the audio/visual effect being used), it's unlikely it's anything except illusion he's using to alter his own appearance. As for what he did with Peter, it definitely seems like some kind of new ability, but I have no idea what it is or how it works. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 16:21, 23 September 2008 (EDT))		* All things considered (including the audio/visual effect being used), it's unlikely it's anything except illusion he's using to alter his own appearance. As for what he did with Peter, it definitely seems like some kind of new ability, but I have no idea what it is or how it works. ([[User:Admin\|Admin]] 16:21, 23 September 2008 (EDT))
Line 8:		Line 8:
	* I'm surprised there hasn't been more debate on this, but I really don't think his ability is illusion. Whenever Candice used illusion, her body and her surroundings rippled... but when Peter uses "illusion," it's a very smooth transformation. Like HiroDynoSlayer suggested, I'm willing to bet that his ability is somewhere along the lines of Connie's ability... but personally, I'm at a loss at how to explain how he changed his clothes. I really think this is different from illusion though. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:59, 22 October 2008 (EDT)		* I'm surprised there hasn't been more debate on this, but I really don't think his ability is illusion. Whenever Candice used illusion, her body and her surroundings rippled... but when Peter uses "illusion," it's a very smooth transformation. Like HiroDynoSlayer suggested, I'm willing to bet that his ability is somewhere along the lines of Connie's ability... but personally, I'm at a loss at how to explain how he changed his clothes. I really think this is different from illusion though. <small>'''Sincerely, Thrashmeister [ [[User:Thrashmeister\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Thrashmeister\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Thrashmeister\|C]] ]'''</small> 21:59, 22 October 2008 (EDT)
	* Actually, I believe this is just him using [[Matt Parkman\|Matt's]] power. We saw in the most recent episode how Matt was able to control his power enough to cause an illusion (just like his [[Maury Parkman\|father]] could). Thoughts? --[[User:Gleezus\|Gleezus]] 14:03, 30 October 2008 (EDT)		* Actually, I believe this is just him using [[Matt Parkman\|Matt's]] power. We saw in the most recent episode how Matt was able to control his power enough to cause an illusion (just like his [[Maury Parkman\|father]] could). Thoughts? --[[User:Gleezus\|Gleezus]] 14:03, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

			I think it's [[illusion]].--[[User:ERROR\|ERROR]] 11:23, 13 June 2009 (EDT)

	==Change Name==		==Change Name==

imported>ZeroTime at 12:09, 21 May 2009

2009-05-21T12:09:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 21 May 2009
Line 72:		Line 72:
	* They weren't talking about managing to shoot Arthur, they were talking about who would have the nerve to do it. About Future Peter healing Nathan, we don't know if he ever learned Linderman had a healing power, for all we know he could have absorbed that power in Villains (his dream of Nathan's accident happened shortly after, so it makes sense he started to absorb abilities then) and he never got into a situation where he needed to use that power, when he was with Nathan in that condition, he obviously had a "I'm sorry it had to come to this" expression, it could have activated the healing ability. He didn't mean to heal Nathan, but the way his ability works and having absorbed the healing ability make a plausible explanation. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 11:04, 24 December 2008 (EST)		* They weren't talking about managing to shoot Arthur, they were talking about who would have the nerve to do it. About Future Peter healing Nathan, we don't know if he ever learned Linderman had a healing power, for all we know he could have absorbed that power in Villains (his dream of Nathan's accident happened shortly after, so it makes sense he started to absorb abilities then) and he never got into a situation where he needed to use that power, when he was with Nathan in that condition, he obviously had a "I'm sorry it had to come to this" expression, it could have activated the healing ability. He didn't mean to heal Nathan, but the way his ability works and having absorbed the healing ability make a plausible explanation. [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 11:04, 24 December 2008 (EST)
	** Don't get me started on the 'how to kill a regenerator' thing, as I consider it the biggest plothole/inconsistency thus far in the series. However, since it has been stated by the writers and now shown that a bullet in the back of the head can do the job permanently, I'll accept that (and simply list it under my caged pet peeves). As to how to reconcile the Future Peter incident, some have theorized that Claire downed him with those shots and then put another one in his head (though this is speculation only. I personally think it seemed like the chest shots killed him and is just more evidence of the regenerator problem). There's certainly not enough evidence to definitively say that Future Peter healed Nathan though. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 13:13, 24 December 2008 (EST)		** Don't get me started on the 'how to kill a regenerator' thing, as I consider it the biggest plothole/inconsistency thus far in the series. However, since it has been stated by the writers and now shown that a bullet in the back of the head can do the job permanently, I'll accept that (and simply list it under my caged pet peeves). As to how to reconcile the Future Peter incident, some have theorized that Claire downed him with those shots and then put another one in his head (though this is speculation only. I personally think it seemed like the chest shots killed him and is just more evidence of the regenerator problem). There's certainly not enough evidence to definitively say that Future Peter healed Nathan though. --[[User:Stevehim\|Stevehim]] 13:13, 24 December 2008 (EST)
	* Well,I'm new to this wiki and all,but I try to keep track of everything on Heroes and the only possible way F-Peter died without the Haitian has blocked power theory is that does anyone remember that Sylar said that he removed the 'sweet spot' with shapeshifting.So,if F-Peter actually has shapeshifing than illusion (seems so) then he moved the sweet spot to somewhere in his chest then the Haitian blocks his power,shoot and killed.~		* Well,I'm new to this wiki and all,but I try to keep track of everything on Heroes and the only possible way F-Peter died without the Haitian has blocked power theory is that does anyone remember that Sylar said that he removed the 'sweet spot' with shapeshifting.So,if F-Peter actually has shapeshifing than illusion (seems so) then he moved the sweet spot to somewhere in his chest then the Haitian blocks his power,shoot and killed.---[[User:ZeroTime\|ZeroTime]] 08:09, 21 May 2009 (EDT)

	==Mental Manipulation==		==Mental Manipulation==