Talk:Petrelli for Congress offices - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Ryangibsonstewart moved page Talk:Nathan's campaign headquarters to Talk:Petrelli for Congress offices: name given in stcdtw

2015-11-28T03:09:09Z

Ryangibsonstewart moved page Talk:Nathan's campaign headquarters to Talk:Petrelli for Congress offices: name given in stcdtw

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 28 November 2015
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Ryangibsonstewart moved page Talk:Nathan's campaign headquarters to Talk:Petrelli for Congress offices: name given in stcdtw

2015-11-28T03:09:09Z

Ryangibsonstewart moved page Talk:Nathan's campaign headquarters to Talk:Petrelli for Congress offices: name given in stcdtw

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:09, 28 November 2015
(No difference)

imported>Hardvice at 22:45, 19 January 2007

2007-01-19T22:45:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 19 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)		: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)
	::I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)		::I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)
			:::I think "workers" is acceptable. We already distinguish "faculty" and "students" from "Employees" on the education pages.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Visitors */ viewing

2007-01-19T22:43:31Z

Visitors: viewing

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 19 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)		I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)
	: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)		: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)
	:I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)		::I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Visitors */

2007-01-19T22:43:12Z

Visitors

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:43, 19 January 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:
	I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)		I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)
	: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)		: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)
			:I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Cuardin at 22:40, 19 January 2007

2007-01-19T22:40:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:40, 19 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Visitors==		==Visitors==
	I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)		I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)
			: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: New page: ==Visitors== I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count Mohinder as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--...

2007-01-19T22:31:01Z

New page: ==Visitors== I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count Mohinder as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--...

New page

==Visitors==
I added Simone and Angela since the campaign event is held at the headquarters. Should we count [[Mohinder]] as a visitor? He met with Nathan out front, but never went in.--[[User:Hardvice|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice|(talk)]]</small> 17:31, 19 January 2007 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:45, 19 January 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)		: Since we are in the context of a TV series, I think we can count "locations" as places, and mohinder was definately at the campaign office location. I think he qualifies. -- [[User:Cuardin\|Cuardin]] 17:40, 19 January 2007 (EST)
	::I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)		::I say yes, count Mohinder - I think going to the location counts as visiting, even if you're just outside.<p>I wanted to distinguish Nathan and the campaign manager as more than "visitors" - I don't think "employees" is the best word. Does "Notable Workers" sound funny? Any suggestions? - [[User:Ryangibsonstewart\|RyanGibsonStewart]] ([[User talk:Ryangibsonstewart\|talk]]) 17:43, 19 January 2007 (EST)
			:::I think "workers" is acceptable. We already distinguish "faculty" and "students" from "Employees" on the education pages.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 17:45, 19 January 2007 (EST)