Talk:Pokémon - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Talk:Pikachu moved to Talk:Pokémon: confirmed references are to Pokémon, not just Pikachu

2010-02-20T13:26:46Z

Talk:Pikachu moved to Talk:Pokémon: confirmed references are to Pokémon, not just Pikachu

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:26, 20 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: Talk:Pikachu moved to Talk:Pokémon: confirmed references are to Pokémon, not just Pikachu

2010-02-20T13:26:46Z

Talk:Pikachu moved to Talk:Pokémon: confirmed references are to Pokémon, not just Pikachu

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:26, 20 February 2010
(No difference)

imported>Intuitive Empath: /* Title */

2010-02-17T20:34:31Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:34, 17 February 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:
	***** Eh, the one in The Trip seems to be like a stretch to me. I don't see any Pokemon looking characters in the image, just generic creatures. I could say that that's a Digimon or a monster from World of Warcraft. I don't think that one even belongs on the page. As for the ChuffaChuffa and Pokemon similarity for the Trial, that wasn't direct enough to warrant it's own section, so it's in the notes. All the other references are actually about Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)		***** Eh, the one in The Trip seems to be like a stretch to me. I don't see any Pokemon looking characters in the image, just generic creatures. I could say that that's a Digimon or a monster from World of Warcraft. I don't think that one even belongs on the page. As for the ChuffaChuffa and Pokemon similarity for the Trial, that wasn't direct enough to warrant it's own section, so it's in the notes. All the other references are actually about Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)
	****** [[Jason Badower]] confirmed that he was referencing ''Pokemon''. [[Heroes Interactive]] also compared Hiro to a ''Pokemon'' character. The only reason the notes were used is because the article is named "Pikachu" and not "Pokemon". Had it been named "Pokemon", there wouldn't even be a discussion. I see no reason not to name the article "Pokemon" and make the article more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 10:39, 17 February 2010 (EST)		****** [[Jason Badower]] confirmed that he was referencing ''Pokemon''. [[Heroes Interactive]] also compared Hiro to a ''Pokemon'' character. The only reason the notes were used is because the article is named "Pikachu" and not "Pokemon". Had it been named "Pokemon", there wouldn't even be a discussion. I see no reason not to name the article "Pokemon" and make the article more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 10:39, 17 February 2010 (EST)
			******* Nit-picking much of my part, but we mustn't forget the "é". It would be "Pokémon". [[User:Intuitive Empath\|Intuitive Empath]] - [[User talk:Intuitive Empath\|Talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Intuitive Empath\|Contributions]] 15:34, 17 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Title */

2010-02-17T15:39:09Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 17 February 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	**** Agree. Also, the character from ''[[The Trip, Part 1]]'' is not Pikachu, but a generic ''Pokémon'' type character. [[Pokémon]] redirects here. I don't see why we wouldn't change the article to be more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:42, 16 February 2010 (EST)		**** Agree. Also, the character from ''[[The Trip, Part 1]]'' is not Pikachu, but a generic ''Pokémon'' type character. [[Pokémon]] redirects here. I don't see why we wouldn't change the article to be more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:42, 16 February 2010 (EST)
	***** Eh, the one in The Trip seems to be like a stretch to me. I don't see any Pokemon looking characters in the image, just generic creatures. I could say that that's a Digimon or a monster from World of Warcraft. I don't think that one even belongs on the page. As for the ChuffaChuffa and Pokemon similarity for the Trial, that wasn't direct enough to warrant it's own section, so it's in the notes. All the other references are actually about Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)		***** Eh, the one in The Trip seems to be like a stretch to me. I don't see any Pokemon looking characters in the image, just generic creatures. I could say that that's a Digimon or a monster from World of Warcraft. I don't think that one even belongs on the page. As for the ChuffaChuffa and Pokemon similarity for the Trial, that wasn't direct enough to warrant it's own section, so it's in the notes. All the other references are actually about Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)
			****** [[Jason Badower]] confirmed that he was referencing ''Pokemon''. [[Heroes Interactive]] also compared Hiro to a ''Pokemon'' character. The only reason the notes were used is because the article is named "Pikachu" and not "Pokemon". Had it been named "Pokemon", there wouldn't even be a discussion. I see no reason not to name the article "Pokemon" and make the article more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 10:39, 17 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* Title */

2010-02-17T08:28:29Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:28, 17 February 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:
	*** In the ''Trial of the Black Bear'' and the ''The Trip, Part 1'', there are characters that are shaped similarly to a ''Pokémon'' character, but don't look like Pikachu. Also, the reference saying "Chuffa! Chuffa!" is similar to Pikachu's "Pika! Pika!", but it's not a direct reference. I'm not opposed to keeping the title Pikachu, just think Pokémon would work better.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 03:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)		*** In the ''Trial of the Black Bear'' and the ''The Trip, Part 1'', there are characters that are shaped similarly to a ''Pokémon'' character, but don't look like Pikachu. Also, the reference saying "Chuffa! Chuffa!" is similar to Pikachu's "Pika! Pika!", but it's not a direct reference. I'm not opposed to keeping the title Pikachu, just think Pokémon would work better.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 03:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)
	**** Agree. Also, the character from ''[[The Trip, Part 1]]'' is not Pikachu, but a generic ''Pokémon'' type character. [[Pokémon]] redirects here. I don't see why we wouldn't change the article to be more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:42, 16 February 2010 (EST)		**** Agree. Also, the character from ''[[The Trip, Part 1]]'' is not Pikachu, but a generic ''Pokémon'' type character. [[Pokémon]] redirects here. I don't see why we wouldn't change the article to be more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:42, 16 February 2010 (EST)
			***** Eh, the one in The Trip seems to be like a stretch to me. I don't see any Pokemon looking characters in the image, just generic creatures. I could say that that's a Digimon or a monster from World of Warcraft. I don't think that one even belongs on the page. As for the ChuffaChuffa and Pokemon similarity for the Trial, that wasn't direct enough to warrant it's own section, so it's in the notes. All the other references are actually about Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 03:28, 17 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Title */

2010-02-16T21:42:17Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 16 February 2010
Line 12:		Line 12:
	** How is the article more about Pokemon in general? The only references are to Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 02:48, 16 February 2010 (EST)		** How is the article more about Pokemon in general? The only references are to Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 02:48, 16 February 2010 (EST)
	*** In the ''Trial of the Black Bear'' and the ''The Trip, Part 1'', there are characters that are shaped similarly to a ''Pokémon'' character, but don't look like Pikachu. Also, the reference saying "Chuffa! Chuffa!" is similar to Pikachu's "Pika! Pika!", but it's not a direct reference. I'm not opposed to keeping the title Pikachu, just think Pokémon would work better.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 03:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)		*** In the ''Trial of the Black Bear'' and the ''The Trip, Part 1'', there are characters that are shaped similarly to a ''Pokémon'' character, but don't look like Pikachu. Also, the reference saying "Chuffa! Chuffa!" is similar to Pikachu's "Pika! Pika!", but it's not a direct reference. I'm not opposed to keeping the title Pikachu, just think Pokémon would work better.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 03:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)
			**** Agree. Also, the character from ''[[The Trip, Part 1]]'' is not Pikachu, but a generic ''Pokémon'' type character. [[Pokémon]] redirects here. I don't see why we wouldn't change the article to be more general. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 16:42, 16 February 2010 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Title */

2010-02-16T08:07:37Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 16 February 2010
Line 11:		Line 11:
	* Good idea. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:04, 16 February 2010 (EST)		* Good idea. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:04, 16 February 2010 (EST)
	** How is the article more about Pokemon in general? The only references are to Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 02:48, 16 February 2010 (EST)		** How is the article more about Pokemon in general? The only references are to Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 02:48, 16 February 2010 (EST)
			*** In the ''Trial of the Black Bear'' and the ''The Trip, Part 1'', there are characters that are shaped similarly to a ''Pokémon'' character, but don't look like Pikachu. Also, the reference saying "Chuffa! Chuffa!" is similar to Pikachu's "Pika! Pika!", but it's not a direct reference. I'm not opposed to keeping the title Pikachu, just think Pokémon would work better.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 03:07, 16 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Riddler: /* Title */

2010-02-16T07:48:07Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 16 February 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:
	This article seems more about ''Pokémon'' in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)		This article seems more about ''Pokémon'' in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)
	* Good idea. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:04, 16 February 2010 (EST)		* Good idea. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:04, 16 February 2010 (EST)
			** How is the article more about Pokemon in general? The only references are to Pikachu.--[[User:Riddler\|Riddler]] 02:48, 16 February 2010 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Title */

2010-02-16T05:04:53Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:04, 16 February 2010
Line 9:		Line 9:
	== Title ==		== Title ==
	This article seems more about ''Pokémon'' in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)		This article seems more about ''Pokémon'' in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)
			* Good idea. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 00:04, 16 February 2010 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Title */

2010-02-16T04:29:28Z

Title

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 16 February 2010
Line 8:		Line 8:

	== Title ==		== Title ==
	This article seems more about ''Pokémon'' in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)		This article seems more about ''Pokémon'' in general, rather than just Pikachu. Perhaps we should rename it?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] 23:28, 15 February 2010 (EST)