Talk:Portal:Events - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv red links

2008-04-13T03:53:12Z

rmv red links

← Older revision	Revision as of 03:53, 13 April 2008
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: rmv red links

2008-04-13T03:53:12Z

rmv red links

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:53, 13 April 2008
Line 82:		Line 82:
	--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)		--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)
	*Sounds like a good preliminary plan to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)		*Sounds like a good preliminary plan to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)
	** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events~~\|here]]~~ for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)		** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split at User:SacValleyDweller/Events for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)
	*** The drafts looks good, but I would format each subportal page as "Portal:<name> Events", and I would add Instant messaging as I indicated above. Also, I think Recurring and Long Term can be shortened to just "Portal:Recurring Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 04:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)		*** The drafts looks good, but I would format each subportal page as "Portal:<name> Events", and I would add Instant messaging as I indicated above. Also, I think Recurring and Long Term can be shortened to just "Portal:Recurring Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 04:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)
	**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my ~~[[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|~~draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my draft portal? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, these are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, these are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	** good point on the eclipse, you sent the jury out on the Linderman's prosecution and Nathan's campaign. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 23:46, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		** good point on the eclipse, you sent the jury out on the Linderman's prosecution and Nathan's campaign. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 23:46, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Archive? */

2008-03-10T03:46:38Z

Archive?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:46, 10 March 2008
Line 87:		Line 87:
	Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, these are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, these are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
			** good point on the eclipse, you sent the jury out on the Linderman's prosecution and Nathan's campaign. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 23:46, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

	==Split==		==Split==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Archive? */ gr

2008-03-09T09:15:50Z

Archive?: gr

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:15, 9 March 2008
Line 86:		Line 86:
	**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, ~~there~~ are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, these are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

	==Split==		==Split==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Archive? */

2008-03-09T09:14:38Z

Archive?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:14, 9 March 2008
Line 86:		Line 86:
	**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	* Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		* My thoughts are that Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events". Again, there are my thoughts here. I welcome others to way in.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

	==Split==		==Split==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Archive? */ +eclipse

2008-03-09T09:12:39Z

Archive?: +eclipse

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 9 March 2008
Line 86:		Line 86:
	**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
	Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)		Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
			* Linderman's prosecuting isn't recurring yet, true, so it should go under "Other Events" along with Nathan's campaign. Assuming we learn Linderman was prosecuted in the past (which is likely since Arthur Petrelli was his attorney for years), then we can move it to recurring. Joining recurring and long-term doesn't make sense to me. BTW, [[eclipse]] is missing from the recurring events list--it's a repeated event so shouldn't be under "Other Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 05:12, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

	==Split==		==Split==

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Archive? */ ry to miami's critique of my draft and ask if we should move forward with the split per my plan

2008-03-09T07:19:54Z

Archive?: ry to miami's critique of my draft and ask if we should move forward with the split per my plan

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:19, 9 March 2008
Line 84:		Line 84:
	** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|here]] for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)		** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|here]] for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)
	*** The drafts looks good, but I would format each subportal page as "Portal:<name> Events", and I would add Instant messaging as I indicated above. Also, I think Recurring and Long Term can be shortened to just "Portal:Recurring Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 04:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)		*** The drafts looks good, but I would format each subportal page as "Portal:<name> Events", and I would add Instant messaging as I indicated above. Also, I think Recurring and Long Term can be shortened to just "Portal:Recurring Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 04:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)
			**** Good Idea about the <name> events, However, shortening "Recurring and Long Term" to just "Recurring" dosent work, due Linderman's prosecution being over, but a long term thing. Also, Instat messaging seems doess't seem significant enough to be worth mentioniong. --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
			Shall we move forward with the split by performing the requisite moves and edits to my [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|draft portal]]? --{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 03:19, 9 March 2008 (EDT)

	==Split==		==Split==
	* We have been discussing splitting this portal at [[User talk:MiamiVolts/Instant messaging]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)		* We have been discussing splitting this portal at [[User talk:MiamiVolts/Instant messaging]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)

imported>MiamiVolts: reply

2008-03-07T09:43:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:43, 7 March 2008
Line 83:		Line 83:
	*Sounds like a good preliminary plan to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)		*Sounds like a good preliminary plan to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)
	** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|here]] for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)		** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|here]] for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)
			*** The drafts looks good, but I would format each subportal page as "Portal:<name> Events", and I would add Instant messaging as I indicated above. Also, I think Recurring and Long Term can be shortened to just "Portal:Recurring Events".--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 04:43, 7 March 2008 (EST)

	==Split==		==Split==
	* We have been discussing splitting this portal at [[User talk:MiamiVolts/Instant messaging]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)		* We have been discussing splitting this portal at [[User talk:MiamiVolts/Instant messaging]].--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 19:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Archive? */ link to rough draft

2008-03-07T06:45:34Z

Archive?: link to rough draft

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:45, 7 March 2008
Line 82:		Line 82:
	--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)		--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 20:57, 6 March 2008 (EST)
	*Sounds like a good preliminary plan to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)		*Sounds like a good preliminary plan to me. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:18, 6 March 2008 (EST)
			** Enthusiasticly, I made a rough draft of this split [[User:SacValleyDweller/Events\|here]] for all to pick at and fine tune :)--{{User:SacValleyDweller/sig}} 01:45, 7 March 2008 (EST)

	==Split==		==Split==

imported>SacValleyDweller: /* Archive? */ edit breakdown

2008-03-07T04:23:11Z

Archive?: edit breakdown

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:23, 7 March 2008
Line 47:		Line 47:
	The explosion <br>		The explosion <br>
	Fire (1992) <br>		Fire (1992) <br>
⚫	Homecoming ??<br>
	Hurricane Katrina<br>		Hurricane Katrina<br>
	Las Vegas house fire <br>		Las Vegas house fire <br>
Line 76:		Line 75:
	Eclipse <br>		Eclipse <br>
	Future Hiro's message <br>		Future Hiro's message <br>
		⚫	Homecoming<br>
	Kensei and the Dragon <br>		Kensei and the Dragon <br>
	Linderman Act <br>		Linderman Act <br>