Talk:Portal:Fan Canon Analysis - Revision history

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 01:20, 19 May 2009

2009-05-19T01:20:25Z

← Older revision	Revision as of 01:20, 19 May 2009
(No difference)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart at 01:20, 19 May 2009

2009-05-19T01:20:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:20, 19 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT)		I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
	*Sorry about that. I got the impression from our [[User_talk:Ryangibsonstewart#Canon_Analysis.2FFan_Concepts\|discussion]] that it would be OK to create a new portal for Fan Concepts. Can we at least put sub-headings on the portal to separate the two sections? --<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight:bold;"></span>'''[[User:Elemental Manipulator\|Elemental Manipulator]]'''</span> [ [[User:Elemental Manipulator\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Elemental Manipulator\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Elemental Manipulator\|C]] ]'''</small> - <span style="color:green;">When in doubt, ask BTE </span> 19:56, 16 May 2009 (EDT)		*Sorry about that. I got the impression from our [[User_talk:Ryangibsonstewart#Canon_Analysis.2FFan_Concepts\|discussion]] that it would be OK to create a new portal for Fan Concepts. Can we at least put sub-headings on the portal to separate the two sections? --<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight:bold;"></span>'''[[User:Elemental Manipulator\|Elemental Manipulator]]'''</span> [ [[User:Elemental Manipulator\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Elemental Manipulator\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Elemental Manipulator\|C]] ]'''</small> - <span style="color:green;">When in doubt, ask BTE </span> 19:56, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
			** I see how you became confused. Completely my fault. I don't think I read your original post on my talk page well enough. I thought you were suggesting a portal that was already created, not splitting one that's kind of small as it is. I'd rather look at renaming this portal to something that encompasses all the articles it contains, rather than splitting it or subdividing it on a micro level. I don't have any name suggestions, though. I think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I would imagine that there must be better ideas out there. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:20, 18 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>Elemental Manipulator at 23:56, 16 May 2009

2009-05-16T23:56:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:56, 16 May 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT)		I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT)
			*Sorry about that. I got the impression from our [[User_talk:Ryangibsonstewart#Canon_Analysis.2FFan_Concepts\|discussion]] that it would be OK to create a new portal for Fan Concepts. Can we at least put sub-headings on the portal to separate the two sections? --<span style="font-size: 10pt; font-weight:bold;"></span>'''[[User:Elemental Manipulator\|Elemental Manipulator]]'''</span> [ [[User:Elemental Manipulator\|U]] \| [[User_talk:Elemental Manipulator\|T]] \| [[Special:Contributions/Elemental Manipulator\|C]] ]'''</small> - <span style="color:green;">When in doubt, ask BTE </span> 19:56, 16 May 2009 (EDT)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: New page: I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to Portal:Fan Canon Analysis...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which cr...

2009-05-16T13:20:09Z

New page: I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to Portal:Fan Canon Analysis...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which cr...

New page

I deleted Portal:Fan Concepts because I felt it only had very slight differences to [[Portal:Fan Canon Analysis]]...and we don't need to split portals based on slight differences, which creates portals of just two or three articles. If we want to talk about renaming this portal so it better suits the articles that are contained here, that's fine. I personally think "Fan Canon Analysis" is fine, but I'm not opposed to other suggestions. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:20, 16 May 2009 (EDT)