Talk:Portal:Main Characters/Season Three - Revision history

imported>Pierre: Talk:Portal:Main Characters moved to Talk:Portal:Main Characters/Season Three

2008-10-24T17:46:23Z

Talk:Portal:Main Characters moved to Talk:Portal:Main Characters/Season Three

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 24 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Pierre: Talk:Portal:Main Characters moved to Talk:Portal:Main Characters/Season Three

2008-10-24T17:46:23Z

Talk:Portal:Main Characters moved to Talk:Portal:Main Characters/Season Three

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:46, 24 October 2008
(No difference)

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Main characters */

2008-06-02T21:18:07Z

Main characters

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 2 June 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Just to clarify, who decides which characters are main/minor/recurring? How do we know which category a new character fits into? (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:33, 2 June 2008 (EDT))		Just to clarify, who decides which characters are main/minor/recurring? How do we know which category a new character fits into? (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:33, 2 June 2008 (EDT))
	* Recurring requires more than one appearance. If only one appearance, they are minor. Main and supporting cast/characters are normally credited in the opening sequences of episodes, so if a character is there, it's not just recurring. Finally, the main characters are normally featured in a group photo for the season--that distinguishes them from the supporting characters. Does that make sense?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:44, 2 June 2008 (EDT)		* Recurring requires more than one appearance. If only one appearance, they are minor. Main and supporting cast/characters are normally credited in the opening sequences of episodes, so if a character is there, it's not just recurring. Finally, the main characters are normally featured in a group photo for the season--that distinguishes them from the supporting characters. Does that make sense?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:44, 2 June 2008 (EDT)
			** Right, okay, thanks for that :) (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 17:18, 2 June 2008 (EDT))

	== Season Two Archives ==		== Season Two Archives ==

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Main characters */

2008-06-02T20:44:44Z

Main characters

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:44, 2 June 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:

	== Main characters ==		== Main characters ==

	Just to clarify, who decides which characters are main/minor/recurring? How do we know which category a new character fits into? (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:33, 2 June 2008 (EDT))		Just to clarify, who decides which characters are main/minor/recurring? How do we know which category a new character fits into? (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:33, 2 June 2008 (EDT))
			* Recurring requires more than one appearance. If only one appearance, they are minor. Main and supporting cast/characters are normally credited in the opening sequences of episodes, so if a character is there, it's not just recurring. Finally, the main characters are normally featured in a group photo for the season--that distinguishes them from the supporting characters. Does that make sense?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:44, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

			== Season Two Archives ==
			* Webisodes are coming in July. Will we consider them Season Three or Season Two? If Season Three, we should probably get started updating the portals and season summaries for the next year, especially since we now know of the main characters, who is and isn't returning.--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 16:44, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Main characters */ new section

2008-06-02T20:33:07Z

Main characters: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:33, 2 June 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	***** Oh, I totally think she bit the dust. But my comment was in response to the idea that Niki "didn't have any chance of surviving", which is simply not true. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)		***** Oh, I totally think she bit the dust. But my comment was in response to the idea that Niki "didn't have any chance of surviving", which is simply not true. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	****** Ah, I misunderstood.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:16, 12 December 2007 (EST)		****** Ah, I misunderstood.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:16, 12 December 2007 (EST)

			== Main characters ==

			Just to clarify, who decides which characters are main/minor/recurring? How do we know which category a new character fits into? (<font color="red">[[User:Friskymuffin\|Friskymuffin]] - <small>([[User talk:Friskymuffin\|talk]])</small></font> 16:33, 2 June 2008 (EDT))

imported>Ice Vision at 04:16, 13 December 2007

2007-12-13T04:16:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:16, 13 December 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	**** I think those cases were a bit different. I doubt Niki can survive that explosion; the whole diner blew up and Niki was still stuck inside. If I were inside that building, I'd be as good as gone. I probably wouldn't have any remains, my entire body disintegrated. Matt's and D.L.'s bodies were still in existence. Nathan dropped Peter before he exploded, so there was quite a distance between the two. Nathan got pretty bad burns, though. That's just my opinion.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 21:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)		**** I think those cases were a bit different. I doubt Niki can survive that explosion; the whole diner blew up and Niki was still stuck inside. If I were inside that building, I'd be as good as gone. I probably wouldn't have any remains, my entire body disintegrated. Matt's and D.L.'s bodies were still in existence. Nathan dropped Peter before he exploded, so there was quite a distance between the two. Nathan got pretty bad burns, though. That's just my opinion.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 21:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	***** Oh, I totally think she bit the dust. But my comment was in response to the idea that Niki "didn't have any chance of surviving", which is simply not true. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)		***** Oh, I totally think she bit the dust. But my comment was in response to the idea that Niki "didn't have any chance of surviving", which is simply not true. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			****** Ah, I misunderstood.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 23:16, 12 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Niki's fate */

2007-12-13T03:49:20Z

Niki's fate

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 13 December 2007
Line 11:		Line 11:
	***...and D.L. was shot at close range, Matt was shot four times, and Noah was shot in the face, and Nathan was close the the epicenter of a nuclear explosion, and they all survived. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:36, 12 December 2007 (EST)		***...and D.L. was shot at close range, Matt was shot four times, and Noah was shot in the face, and Nathan was close the the epicenter of a nuclear explosion, and they all survived. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:36, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	**** I think those cases were a bit different. I doubt Niki can survive that explosion; the whole diner blew up and Niki was still stuck inside. If I were inside that building, I'd be as good as gone. I probably wouldn't have any remains, my entire body disintegrated. Matt's and D.L.'s bodies were still in existence. Nathan dropped Peter before he exploded, so there was quite a distance between the two. Nathan got pretty bad burns, though. That's just my opinion.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 21:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)		**** I think those cases were a bit different. I doubt Niki can survive that explosion; the whole diner blew up and Niki was still stuck inside. If I were inside that building, I'd be as good as gone. I probably wouldn't have any remains, my entire body disintegrated. Matt's and D.L.'s bodies were still in existence. Nathan dropped Peter before he exploded, so there was quite a distance between the two. Nathan got pretty bad burns, though. That's just my opinion.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 21:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			***** Oh, I totally think she bit the dust. But my comment was in response to the idea that Niki "didn't have any chance of surviving", which is simply not true. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 22:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ice Vision: /* Niki's fate */

2007-12-13T02:49:09Z

Niki's fate

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 13 December 2007
Line 10:		Line 10:
	**But Niki was in a building that EXPLODED she didn't had any chance of surviving. -- {{User:Kejehegefe\|Kejehegefe}} 20:00, 12 December 2007 (EST)		**But Niki was in a building that EXPLODED she didn't had any chance of surviving. -- {{User:Kejehegefe\|Kejehegefe}} 20:00, 12 December 2007 (EST)
	***...and D.L. was shot at close range, Matt was shot four times, and Noah was shot in the face, and Nathan was close the the epicenter of a nuclear explosion, and they all survived. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:36, 12 December 2007 (EST)		***...and D.L. was shot at close range, Matt was shot four times, and Noah was shot in the face, and Nathan was close the the epicenter of a nuclear explosion, and they all survived. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:36, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			**** I think those cases were a bit different. I doubt Niki can survive that explosion; the whole diner blew up and Niki was still stuck inside. If I were inside that building, I'd be as good as gone. I probably wouldn't have any remains, my entire body disintegrated. Matt's and D.L.'s bodies were still in existence. Nathan dropped Peter before he exploded, so there was quite a distance between the two. Nathan got pretty bad burns, though. That's just my opinion.--[[User:Ice Vision\|Ice Vision]] 21:49, 12 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Niki's fate */

2007-12-13T02:36:21Z

Niki's fate

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:36, 13 December 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	*You're right that we shouldn't assume Niki and Nathan are dead yet. But I don't think that assuming so is really a "random conclusion". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:09, 4 December 2007 (EST)		*You're right that we shouldn't assume Niki and Nathan are dead yet. But I don't think that assuming so is really a "random conclusion". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:09, 4 December 2007 (EST)
	**But Niki was in a building that EXPLODED she didn't had any chance of surviving. -- {{User:Kejehegefe\|Kejehegefe}} 20:00, 12 December 2007 (EST)		**But Niki was in a building that EXPLODED she didn't had any chance of surviving. -- {{User:Kejehegefe\|Kejehegefe}} 20:00, 12 December 2007 (EST)
			***...and D.L. was shot at close range, Matt was shot four times, and Noah was shot in the face, and Nathan was close the the epicenter of a nuclear explosion, and they all survived. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:36, 12 December 2007 (EST)

imported>Kejehegefe at 02:14, 13 December 2007

2007-12-13T02:14:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:14, 13 December 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	All it said in the previews was that 2 heroes will "fall"! I cant remember but Im sure that I never heard them say anything about them being dead! We should just wait and see what happens and stop jumping to so many random conclusions!		All it said in the previews was that 2 heroes will "fall"! I cant remember but Im sure that I never heard them say anything about them being dead! We should just wait and see what happens and stop jumping to so many random conclusions!
	*You're right that we shouldn't assume Niki and Nathan are dead yet. But I don't think that assuming so is really a "random conclusion". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:09, 4 December 2007 (EST)		*You're right that we shouldn't assume Niki and Nathan are dead yet. But I don't think that assuming so is really a "random conclusion". -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 21:09, 4 December 2007 (EST)
			**But Niki was in a building that EXPLODED she didn't had any chance of surviving. -- {{User:Kejehegefe\|Kejehegefe}} 20:00, 12 December 2007 (EST)