Talk:Portal:Portals - Revision history

imported>Leckie: Undo revision 448627 by Welsley (Talk): I'd class this as spam

2010-07-02T11:09:40Z

Undo revision 448627 by Welsley (Talk): I'd class this as spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 2 July 2010
(No difference)

imported>Leckie: Undo revision 448627 by Welsley (Talk): I'd class this as spam

2010-07-02T11:09:40Z

Undo revision 448627 by Welsley (Talk): I'd class this as spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:09, 2 July 2010
Line 98:		Line 98:
	When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Personally I think of the webisodes as a sub category of Heroes Evolutions, but more in a graphic novel way, that it enhances the story without being totally user interactive like other Evolutions stuff. I think they should be under Evolutions... although I don't really mind either way. Guess it'll be more clear when they're released. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 11:44, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		* Personally I think of the webisodes as a sub category of Heroes Evolutions, but more in a graphic novel way, that it enhances the story without being totally user interactive like other Evolutions stuff. I think they should be under Evolutions... although I don't really mind either way. Guess it'll be more clear when they're released. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 11:44, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

	== one soccer team ==

	I'd like to tell you that I love [http://www.fcbarca.com FC Barca]. Welcome to join our community.

imported>Welsley: /* one soccer team */ new section

2010-07-02T07:27:11Z

one soccer team: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:27, 2 July 2010
Line 98:		Line 98:
	When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
	* Personally I think of the webisodes as a sub category of Heroes Evolutions, but more in a graphic novel way, that it enhances the story without being totally user interactive like other Evolutions stuff. I think they should be under Evolutions... although I don't really mind either way. Guess it'll be more clear when they're released. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 11:44, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		* Personally I think of the webisodes as a sub category of Heroes Evolutions, but more in a graphic novel way, that it enhances the story without being totally user interactive like other Evolutions stuff. I think they should be under Evolutions... although I don't really mind either way. Guess it'll be more clear when they're released. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 11:44, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

			== one soccer team ==

			I'd like to tell you that I love [http://www.fcbarca.com FC Barca]. Welcome to join our community.

imported>Friskymuffin: /* Webisodes */ + reply

2008-07-04T15:44:06Z

Webisodes: + reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 4 July 2008
Line 97:		Line 97:

	When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)		When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)
			* Personally I think of the webisodes as a sub category of Heroes Evolutions, but more in a graphic novel way, that it enhances the story without being totally user interactive like other Evolutions stuff. I think they should be under Evolutions... although I don't really mind either way. Guess it'll be more clear when they're released. -- {{User:Friskymuffin/Sig}} 11:44, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

imported>DocM: /* Webisodes */ new section

2008-07-04T15:12:30Z

Webisodes: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:12, 4 July 2008
Line 93:		Line 93:
	* I use the portals a lot for navigating, but I rarely use this particular portal. I, too, want to make sure it's as user-friendly as possible. As it is, it just seems to get a bit confused. I think in this portal, simpler is better. I like what you did there above. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:14, 29 February 2008 (EST)		* I use the portals a lot for navigating, but I rarely use this particular portal. I, too, want to make sure it's as user-friendly as possible. As it is, it just seems to get a bit confused. I think in this portal, simpler is better. I like what you did there above. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:14, 29 February 2008 (EST)
	** My opinion is split on this. I like the idea of a simpler portal, but I also like the ability to peek through at the many portals all at once and I think it helps with the rankings. Would you be open to using collapsible tables to have them shrunk by default but expandable?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:57, 29 February 2008 (EST)		** My opinion is split on this. I like the idea of a simpler portal, but I also like the ability to peek through at the many portals all at once and I think it helps with the rankings. Would you be open to using collapsible tables to have them shrunk by default but expandable?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:57, 29 February 2008 (EST)

			== Webisodes ==

			When the webisodes start getting released (which will most likely be soon), will it be placed underneath "Heroes Evolutions", or will it get its own little segment called "Webisodes"? I mean, they might release more than one series of webisodes, for instance, and then we can split the webisode characters from the rest of the world. Thoughts? --[[User:DocM\|DocM]] 11:12, 4 July 2008 (EDT)

imported>MiamiVolts: /* Too Crowded?, Take II */

2008-02-29T19:57:33Z

Too Crowded?, Take II

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:57, 29 February 2008
Line 92:		Line 92:
	I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)		I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)
	* I use the portals a lot for navigating, but I rarely use this particular portal. I, too, want to make sure it's as user-friendly as possible. As it is, it just seems to get a bit confused. I think in this portal, simpler is better. I like what you did there above. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:14, 29 February 2008 (EST)		* I use the portals a lot for navigating, but I rarely use this particular portal. I, too, want to make sure it's as user-friendly as possible. As it is, it just seems to get a bit confused. I think in this portal, simpler is better. I like what you did there above. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:14, 29 February 2008 (EST)
			** My opinion is split on this. I like the idea of a simpler portal, but I also like the ability to peek through at the many portals all at once and I think it helps with the rankings. Would you be open to using collapsible tables to have them shrunk by default but expandable?--[[User:MiamiVolts\|MiamiVolts]] ([[User_talk:MiamiVolts\|talk]]) 14:57, 29 February 2008 (EST)

imported>Ryangibsonstewart: /* Too Crowded?, Take II */

2008-02-29T14:14:32Z

Too Crowded?, Take II

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:14, 29 February 2008
Line 91:		Line 91:

	I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)		I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)
			* I use the portals a lot for navigating, but I rarely use this particular portal. I, too, want to make sure it's as user-friendly as possible. As it is, it just seems to get a bit confused. I think in this portal, simpler is better. I like what you did there above. -- {{User:Ryangibsonstewart/sig}} 09:14, 29 February 2008 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: /* Too Crowded?, Take II */ cat on keyboard

2008-02-29T09:32:26Z

Too Crowded?, Take II: cat on keyboard

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 29 February 2008
Line 90:		Line 90:
	</center>		</center>

	I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:		I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)
	Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: $^#&$@#&$ colon

2008-02-29T09:32:09Z

$^#&$@#&$ colon

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:32, 29 February 2008
Line 90:		Line 90:
	</center>		</center>

	I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[~~Category~~:~~Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)~~		I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[:
			Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)

imported>Hardvice: /* Too Crowded?, Take II */

2008-02-29T09:31:43Z

Too Crowded?, Take II

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:31, 29 February 2008
Line 90:		Line 90:
	</center>		</center>

	I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res.--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)		I'm finally at the point where I'm leaning towards the latter. We already have all of the individual portals (for inter-portal nav and the categories); it's only this portal that doesn't line up well. It is an extra click to get to everything, but I think it makes information easier to find. I'm growing worried that the casual portal visitor might not even realize that we have portals for cast, crew, and such now that they're "below the fold" at most screen res. And indeed, with this portal condensed, we can even add explanations of what each portal contains, i.e. an explanation of the top-level categories like appears on [[Category:Categories]].--[[User:Hardvice\|Hardvice]] <small>[[User talk:Hardvice\|(talk)]]</small> 04:29, 29 February 2008 (EST)